Linux for the International Space Station Program
The first element of the International Space Station (ISS) has already been launched from Baikonur, Russia. ISS is the biggest civilian endeavor ever entrusted to human science and technology. Thousands of software code lines are being, and will be, written for the station, on-ground and on-board. ISS represents a synergy among many space agencies and companies around the globe, including European Space Agency (ESA). ESA has been developing several prototype systems which will pave the technology road for the European contributions to the ISS program. Among others, ESA has chosen Linux as the operating system for two software products which will control the rendezvous and docking operations for a servicing spacecraft called ATV. This article presents an overview of these products, explaining why they run on Linux, the advantages and disadvantages of doing so and the future of Linux in the space industry.
The ESA Automatic Transfer Vehicle (ATV) is an unmanned spacecraft planned to perform regular re-boosting and re-fueling of the International Space Station. Other ATV missions will comprise payload supply and payload removal from the ISS. The ATV is an ongoing project approved in October 1995 by the Council of the European Space Agency. ATV is scheduled to be launched for the first time by an Ariane 5 rocket from Kourou, French Guyana in February 2003.
In its early configuration, ATV was designed as a cylindrical shaped spacecraft containing a cargo module (pressurized or unpressurized), a docking port and a propulsion module. Lately, ATV was modified with four solar panels added (see Figure 1).
The ATV mission profile establishes docking with the ISS in the Russian segment of the station. Rendezvous operations start at about 20km behind the station. This means that ATV will fly behind and faster than ISS, in order to catch up to the docking port of the station. The problem of the space rendezvous is the mating of two spacecraft in orbit—a small active chaser spacecraft (ATV) and a big target (ISS).
Although spacecraft rendezvous and docking may look simple, they are not. The mathematical equations governing the relative movement between chaser and target are rather complex. The onboard control of the rendezvous operations is to a large extent automatic, but not fully autonomous. Some control tasks are done from the ground control center and others onboard the station. Although the ATV onboard computer is fault tolerant, the complexity of the mission does not allow the prevention of and recovery all possible types of mission failures. Special features of the onboard system would allow detecting and forecasting failures, isolating them and proposing and executing recovery actions, but only for those types of contingencies anticipated during system design. The failure detection and recovery features are linked to both mission safety and mission success.
To overcome these and other issues, ESA built two products: GOAS and RACSI. GOAS is the Ground Operator Assistant System for the rendezvous operations of ATV. Used on ground, GOAS is a software tool to monitor the ATV mission and intervene in case of a problem. GOAS provides complex command and control capabilities to replan the entire mission if necessary. RACSI is the remote ATV control at ISS. RACSI is a laptop computer running a software package operated by an astronaut onboard the station. RACSI double monitors and checks the ATV mission and provides two simple command capabilities: temporarily interrupt the mission or command a collision-avoidance maneuver.
Currently, both the GOAS and RACSI developments run under Linux. Although GOAS was developed on Solaris (using versions 1 and 2), the software was ported to Linux without difficulties. RACSI was originally programmed entirely under Linux. For both systems, Linux was chosen as the underlying operating system because it provides four basic features required by up-to-date space applications: reliability, performance, portability and affordability. Reliability is crucial to space applications. The feature of reliability is guaranteed by the robustness of Linux: both applications run dozens of processes concurrently, using extensively shared memories and semaphores. The software never crashes or misbehaves, despite the fact that both systems were designed to run nonstop for weeks or even months.
Performance is the definitive factor in measuring real-time critical software. Although Linux is not used in real-time mode (the RT-Linux module is not loaded), the applications run in real time. That is, they receive data from the spacecraft, display it and send it back to the satellite, all in real time. Everything runs within the specified communications rate between craft.
Software portability is of vital importance for upgrades and applications enhancement. Portability among UNIX flavors can be done quickly, preserving expandability and keeping manpower costs down. This is not true for other non-UNIX operating systems. In addition, Linux is available for an enormous range of hardware platforms, making the change between platforms as simple as recompiling (in most cases).
Nowadays, space applications often lack the funds needed to buy costly licenses. Linux is a zero-cost operating system, which provides true affordability. It can be copied as many times as desired, keeping license costs and royalties low. This is true not only for the operating system but also for the tools (compilers, debuggers, editors, development environments, etc.) which come with it.
Practical Task Scheduling Deployment
July 20, 2016 12:00 pm CDT
One of the best things about the UNIX environment (aside from being stable and efficient) is the vast array of software tools available to help you do your job. Traditionally, a UNIX tool does only one thing, but does that one thing very well. For example, grep is very easy to use and can search vast amounts of data quickly. The find tool can find a particular file or files based on all kinds of criteria. It's pretty easy to string these tools together to build even more powerful tools, such as a tool that finds all of the .log files in the /home directory and searches each one for a particular entry. This erector-set mentality allows UNIX system administrators to seem to always have the right tool for the job.
Cron traditionally has been considered another such a tool for job scheduling, but is it enough? This webinar considers that very question. The first part builds on a previous Geek Guide, Beyond Cron, and briefly describes how to know when it might be time to consider upgrading your job scheduling infrastructure. The second part presents an actual planning and implementation framework.
Join Linux Journal's Mike Diehl and Pat Cameron of Help Systems.
Free to Linux Journal readers.Register Now!
- Stunnel Security for Oracle
- Interview with Patrick Volkerding
- Tips for Optimizing Linux Memory Usage
- What's GNU
- Secure Logging Over a Network
- Apache 2.0: The Internals of the New, Improved
- User-Mode Linux
- Getting Started with mod_security
- Using C for CGI Programming
- FSlint: annoyingly vague, but useful
With all the industry talk about the benefits of Linux on Power and all the performance advantages offered by its open architecture, you may be considering a move in that direction. If you are thinking about analytics, big data and cloud computing, you would be right to evaluate Power. The idea of using commodity x86 hardware and replacing it every three years is an outdated cost model. It doesn’t consider the total cost of ownership, and it doesn’t consider the advantage of real processing power, high-availability and multithreading like a demon.
This ebook takes a look at some of the practical applications of the Linux on Power platform and ways you might bring all the performance power of this open architecture to bear for your organization. There are no smoke and mirrors here—just hard, cold, empirical evidence provided by independent sources. I also consider some innovative ways Linux on Power will be used in the future.Get the Guide