Letters to the Editor
Hi! First off, thanks for Linux Journal. I have a comment about a particular command in the article “Linux Tips: How to move /home to a new hard drive on your Linux system” in December's issue.
cp -r /home/* /mnt
as suggested to copy the home directory does not copy symbolic or hard links correctly. (I am not sure about the other command suggested for I don't have cpio on my system.) If the user has many links, she will find that the “copy” in /mnt takes up more disk space. The following command will copy links correctly:
(cd /home ; tar cf - .) | (cd /mnt ; tar xvf -)
Cheers,Delman Lee email@example.com
We had the same problem in an earlier article, and the same (correct) response. I never use cp -r myself, and for some reason or other did not catch this mistake. Thanks for the note.
The control port which corresponds with printer data port 0x378 is 0x37a, and not 0x380, as described in Kernel Korner, December issue (#8). Why is it required that the example user space printer driver be compiled with optimization turned on? And what level opt?David Morris firstname.lastname@example.org
You are absolutely right; I must have been writing too late at night. Fortunately, this mistake was not propagated into the userlp.c code that was included in the article; there, I let the computer do the arithmetic, so that I couldn't accidentally replace hex arithmetic with decimal arithmetic. The reason I was working in decimal was that I had just been working on the shell script version which I mentioned but didn't include in the article, where I had to do all the arithmetic in decimal. Perhaps that is another good reason not to try to write device drivers as shell scripts.
The reason that the userlp.c program included has to be compiled with optimization (of any level at all) turned on is that all the port I/O functions are defined in the header files as “static inline” functions, a GCC extension is enabled only by turning on optimization. I'm sorry that was not adequately addressed in the article.
|Nativ Disc||Sep 23, 2016|
|Android Browser Security--What You Haven't Been Told||Sep 22, 2016|
|The Many Paths to a Solution||Sep 21, 2016|
|Synopsys' Coverity||Sep 20, 2016|
|Naztech's Roadstar 5 Car Charger||Sep 16, 2016|
|RPi-Powered pi-topCEED Makes the Case as a Low-Cost Modular Learning Desktop||Sep 15, 2016|
- Readers' Choice Awards 2013
- Android Browser Security--What You Haven't Been Told
- Download "Linux Management with Red Hat Satellite: Measuring Business Impact and ROI"
- The Many Paths to a Solution
- Nativ Disc
- Synopsys' Coverity
- Naztech's Roadstar 5 Car Charger
- Securing the Programmer
- CodeLathe FileCloud Google Chrome Extension
- Identity: Our Last Stand
With all the industry talk about the benefits of Linux on Power and all the performance advantages offered by its open architecture, you may be considering a move in that direction. If you are thinking about analytics, big data and cloud computing, you would be right to evaluate Power. The idea of using commodity x86 hardware and replacing it every three years is an outdated cost model. It doesn’t consider the total cost of ownership, and it doesn’t consider the advantage of real processing power, high-availability and multithreading like a demon.
This ebook takes a look at some of the practical applications of the Linux on Power platform and ways you might bring all the performance power of this open architecture to bear for your organization. There are no smoke and mirrors here—just hard, cold, empirical evidence provided by independent sources. I also consider some innovative ways Linux on Power will be used in the future.Get the Guide