Building a Distributed Spreadsheet in Modula-3
We need some underlying data structure for our spreadsheet, so let's begin simply by typing:
TYPE Grid: REF ARRAY OF ARRAY OF INTEGER;
TYPE Grid: REF ARRAY OF ARRAY OF Money.T;This defines a two dimensional grid of integers (in the first line), or, as a second option, of type Money.T. Integers are a built-in type. Money.T is a programmer-defined type; the “.T” suffix is a Modula-3 convention. (In a real spreadsheet, each column would have a distinct user-defined type. Let that detail pass for now.)
A new grid can be allocated on the heap during variable declarations, if you wish, or during program execution.
VAR myGrid : Grid := NEW (Grid, rows, cols); BEGIN myGrid := NEW (Grid, 100, 20); END.
The second assignment of myGrid will wipe out the first, but don't be alarmed—we do not have a memory leak. The Modula-3 garbage collector takes care of reclaiming lost memory. This is also true of object variables (no destructors necessary), including objects that allocate memory on remote machines.
To flesh out our spreadsheet object, we next attach some operator methods to the grid. A good place for this is in a separate “interface” file. Listing 1 contains an initial cut at spreadsheet.i3. Our object is now declared to be a Spreadsheet.T type.
The important property of an interface is that it contains no executable code whatsoever. That's reserved for “.m3” or module files. The interface does not say how something is computed, merely what it does. This is similar to .h files in C, but is more strict. Only the operations explicitly exposed in an interface—or “exported” to use the jargon—are available for outside use.
(The sharp reader may have noticed that the representation of Grid is exposed in spreadsheet.i3—a bad thing. Modula-3 does allow you to hide details of representation inside implementation files. That would take us into a discussion of opaque types, however, a more advanced topic.)
Modula-3 comes with a multi-platform windowing system called Trestle. Built upon Trestle is a user interface toolkit called VBTkit, and a UI builder, FormsVBT. You may call X directly if you wish (alternatively, the Win32 GDI), but in doing so you lose portability.
A description of your program's user interface is called a “Trestle Form”. A form is a textual description of names and values, organized using nested parentheses. Form elements consist of windows, frames, buttons and so on, as well as properties such as color. Listing 2 is a sample form for a popup calculator, as shown in Figure 1.
The important point is that a form is defined in its own file, outside any Modula-3 code. This separation of concerns proves valuable when the user interface designer is a different person from the primary coder. The form does not describe how to construct the interface, merely what it looks like. The FormsVBT library builds it at run time and hooks it into your code.
Suppose our spreadsheet is implemented, along with a suite of test functions. To build a program, we must inform the compiler what source files comprise our executable. This is done in a Modula-3 make file, or m3makefile. An example is shown in Listing 3.
To build your program, at the command-line prompt type:
The compiler will determine dependency relations for you, recompiling only what is necessary.
Converting a regular object (restricted to a single address space) to a network object (visible over the Net) is not as difficult as you might imagine. You must attend to four details.
First, the network object library needs to be linked in. This is performed in the m3makefile (Listing 3).
Second, make the following two changes to the spreadsheet interface:
IMPORT Money; IMPORT NetObj; (* new statement *) TYPE T = NetObj.T OBJECT (* modified line *) grid: Grid; name: TEXT; METHODS ...
Third, and this matters only at execution time, a network object daemon needs to be running in the background. The program is supplied as part of Modula-3. Start the daemon by typing:
netobjd &In a client-server architecture, the spreadsheet object resides with the server, yet it is the client that issues method calls (to update a cell, for example). Clients need to find out about each other. This is the fourth detail.
Practical Task Scheduling Deployment
July 20, 2016 12:00 pm CDT
One of the best things about the UNIX environment (aside from being stable and efficient) is the vast array of software tools available to help you do your job. Traditionally, a UNIX tool does only one thing, but does that one thing very well. For example, grep is very easy to use and can search vast amounts of data quickly. The find tool can find a particular file or files based on all kinds of criteria. It's pretty easy to string these tools together to build even more powerful tools, such as a tool that finds all of the .log files in the /home directory and searches each one for a particular entry. This erector-set mentality allows UNIX system administrators to seem to always have the right tool for the job.
Cron traditionally has been considered another such a tool for job scheduling, but is it enough? This webinar considers that very question. The first part builds on a previous Geek Guide, Beyond Cron, and briefly describes how to know when it might be time to consider upgrading your job scheduling infrastructure. The second part presents an actual planning and implementation framework.
Join Linux Journal's Mike Diehl and Pat Cameron of Help Systems.
Free to Linux Journal readers.Register Now!
- SourceClear Open
- SUSE LLC's SUSE Manager
- Tech Tip: Really Simple HTTP Server with Python
- Linux in Government: Open Source Innovation within the DoD
- Managing Linux Using Puppet
- LAMP Development at Public Sector Web Sites
- Returning Values from Bash Functions
- July 2016 Issue of Linux Journal
- My +1 Sword of Productivity
- Linux Access in State and Local Government, Part VII
With all the industry talk about the benefits of Linux on Power and all the performance advantages offered by its open architecture, you may be considering a move in that direction. If you are thinking about analytics, big data and cloud computing, you would be right to evaluate Power. The idea of using commodity x86 hardware and replacing it every three years is an outdated cost model. It doesn’t consider the total cost of ownership, and it doesn’t consider the advantage of real processing power, high-availability and multithreading like a demon.
This ebook takes a look at some of the practical applications of the Linux on Power platform and ways you might bring all the performance power of this open architecture to bear for your organization. There are no smoke and mirrors here—just hard, cold, empirical evidence provided by independent sources. I also consider some innovative ways Linux on Power will be used in the future.Get the Guide