Linux Trademark Dispute

August 1st, 1997 by Phil Hughes in

Being on the Board of Directors of Linux International, I was a participant as well as an observer in the battle.
Your rating: None Average: 5 (1 vote)

At this point it looks like the good guys will win. As I write this (June 4) there is a verbal agreement which will give the Linux community clear title to the Linux name. By the time you read this article there should be a final, written agreement. For details, select the Hot Linux News button on our web page at http://www.ssc.com/lj/.

For those of you new to the trademark dispute, let me fill in a little history. In 1996, Linux vendors (including us) started receiving letters from an attorney representing Mr. William Della Croce, Jr. requesting royalties for our use of his trademark. Investigation revealed that he did in fact have a trademark on the Linux name.

The Linux vendor community decided to fight the battle together and, through Linux International, enlisted the services of G. Gervaise Davis III of Davis & Schroder (http://www.iplaywers.com). Gerry Davis had already jumped on the bandwagon because he knew of the Linux effort. His willingness to take the case because he cared cut our costs substantially.

Being on the Board of Directors of Linux International, I was a participant as well as an observer in the battle. While not everyone agreed with every decision along the way, we all shared the common goal of getting the Linux trademark clearly into the hands of the Linux community. Even with our diverse backgrounds we managed to pull together the necessary information and resources to present a common front.

For example, when we found out that Mr. Della Croce's trademark was filed in 1994, Adam Richter of Yggdrasil Computing jumped forward with information that he was shipping Linux on CDs in December, 1992. Also, a few hundred thousand copies of Linux Journal published in 1993 certainly had to help our case.

Where Are We Now?

First and foremost, we have proved that while we may have competing commercial interests, we can work together for the common good of the Linux community. I also think that while this action was costly to Linux vendors it has helped Linux become legitimate in the eyes of the non-believers. Besides the vendors who are members of Linux International that supported the effort, we have received letters from many of our readers asking if there was a place to send money to help support the effort. This shows the sense of cooperation that made Linux possible in the first place.

Thanks to everyone that helped.

__________________________

Phil Hughes


Special Magazine Offer -- Free Gift with Subscription
Receive a free digital copy of Linux Journal's System Administration Special Edition as well as instant online access to current and past issues. CLICK HERE for offer

Linux Journal: delivering readers the advice and inspiration they need to get the most out of their Linux systems since 1994.

Post new comment

Please note that comments may not appear immediately, so there is no need to repost your comment.
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <pre> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <i> <b>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Newsletter

Each week Linux Journal editors will tell you what's hot in the world of Linux. You will receive late breaking news, technical tips and tricks, and links to in-depth stories featured on www.linuxjournal.com.
Sign up for our Email Newsletter

Tech Tip Videos

From the Magazine

July 2009, #183

News Flash: Linux Kernel 3.0 to include an on-the-go Expresso machine interface! Ok, maybe not, but Linux is definitely going mobile, from phones to e-readers. Find out more inside about Android, the Kindle 2, the Western Digital MyBook II, The Bug, and Indamixx (a portable recording studio). And if you've gone mobile and you been wanting more Emacs in your life then check out Conkeror.


To compliment the mobile we've got the stationary: parsing command line options with getopt, checking your Ruby code with metric_fu, and building a secure Squid proxy. How is this stationary you ask? What can we say? It's not. We just wanted to see if anybody actually read this part of the page :) .


All this and more, and all you have to do is get your hot sweaty hands on the latest copy of Linux Journal.





Read this issue