Linux Trademark Dispute

Being on the Board of Directors of Linux International, I was a participant as well as an observer in the battle.

At this point it looks like the good guys will win. As I write this (June 4) there is a verbal agreement which will give the Linux community clear title to the Linux name. By the time you read this article there should be a final, written agreement. For details, select the Hot Linux News button on our web page at

For those of you new to the trademark dispute, let me fill in a little history. In 1996, Linux vendors (including us) started receiving letters from an attorney representing Mr. William Della Croce, Jr. requesting royalties for our use of his trademark. Investigation revealed that he did in fact have a trademark on the Linux name.

The Linux vendor community decided to fight the battle together and, through Linux International, enlisted the services of G. Gervaise Davis III of Davis & Schroder ( Gerry Davis had already jumped on the bandwagon because he knew of the Linux effort. His willingness to take the case because he cared cut our costs substantially.

Being on the Board of Directors of Linux International, I was a participant as well as an observer in the battle. While not everyone agreed with every decision along the way, we all shared the common goal of getting the Linux trademark clearly into the hands of the Linux community. Even with our diverse backgrounds we managed to pull together the necessary information and resources to present a common front.

For example, when we found out that Mr. Della Croce's trademark was filed in 1994, Adam Richter of Yggdrasil Computing jumped forward with information that he was shipping Linux on CDs in December, 1992. Also, a few hundred thousand copies of Linux Journal published in 1993 certainly had to help our case.

Where Are We Now?

First and foremost, we have proved that while we may have competing commercial interests, we can work together for the common good of the Linux community. I also think that while this action was costly to Linux vendors it has helped Linux become legitimate in the eyes of the non-believers. Besides the vendors who are members of Linux International that supported the effort, we have received letters from many of our readers asking if there was a place to send money to help support the effort. This shows the sense of cooperation that made Linux possible in the first place.

Thanks to everyone that helped.


Phil Hughes

One Click, Universal Protection: Implementing Centralized Security Policies on Linux Systems

As Linux continues to play an ever increasing role in corporate data centers and institutions, ensuring the integrity and protection of these systems must be a priority. With 60% of the world's websites and an increasing share of organization's mission-critical workloads running on Linux, failing to stop malware and other advanced threats on Linux can increasingly impact an organization's reputation and bottom line.

Learn More

Sponsored by Bit9

Linux Backup and Recovery Webinar

Most companies incorporate backup procedures for critical data, which can be restored quickly if a loss occurs. However, fewer companies are prepared for catastrophic system failures, in which they lose all data, the entire operating system, applications, settings, patches and more, reducing their system(s) to “bare metal.” After all, before data can be restored to a system, there must be a system to restore it to.

In this one hour webinar, learn how to enhance your existing backup strategies for better disaster recovery preparedness using Storix System Backup Administrator (SBAdmin), a highly flexible bare-metal recovery solution for UNIX and Linux systems.

Learn More

Sponsored by Storix