Linux at Holt Public Schools
Holt Public Schools is located in the mid-Michigan area and is comprised of approximately 5,400 students, ranging from pre-school to 12th grade. We have a wide area network of 10 schools and an administrative office building. Within these schools are a total of about 900 workstations: some 600 Macintosh machines (LC3s and Centris 610s) and around 300 Intel machines. The network, as installed, was comprised of a number of 10MB/s Ethernet LAN segments connected by 56K leased lines. The DSU/CSU units were controlled by Novell 4.x file servers using Newport Systems LAN2LAN cards and routed only IPX traffic. The Novell file servers provided NetWare services to the Intel machines and AppleTalk services to the Macintosh machines.
Since 1993, the computer networking world has been turned upside down, and we recognized the need to update our system. In addition to the need for greater bandwidth for applications, getting Internet access to the classrooms has become a must. Public schools have always been faced with tight financial budgets and implementing a major change in a network is usually quite costly. Because of these factors, our district was forced to examine alternative ways to upgrade our system. Through the combination of two key technologies, spread spectrum wireless WAN links and Linux proxy servers, we were able to provide what our district wanted: a system that is highly functional and low in cost. In fact, based on our financial calculations, the entire system (including the Linux machine hardware) should pay for itself within 5 years, based solely on the recurring costs of six leased lines.
There were two major problems in upgrading our network. The first was that our WAN links were slow and very expensive. Using 56K DSU/CSUs, we were able to pass GroupWise e-mail, do some management and replicate our Novell directory services. At this speed, copying files was slow, and Internet access for the entire district was unthinkable. To provide for more bandwidth, we replaced our 56K lines with a wireless 4MB/s bridge unit from Pinnacle Communications of Dayton, Ohio. The wireless links can transmit data at a rate of 2MB/s on each channel simultaneously and function as an Ethernet bridge.
An Ethernet bridge, in its simplest form, is a device that will selectively forward or drop a packet based on its destination. The bridge learns which network devices (based on its unique MAC address) are on which network interface and records the information into its internal tables. When a packet reaches the bridge, the bridge looks at its destination. If the packet is destined for the opposite side of the bridge, it is forwarded. If the packet is destined for a network device on the same side of the bridge, it is ignored. In this way, the bridge passes only packets that need to be sent and eliminates unnecessary traffic between segments. The wireless bridge product we use performs this exact function between an Ethernet segment and a wireless “virtual” network. This makes network configuration very simple and efficient.
Originally, we used a routed 56K solution such as that shown in Figure 1. This worked relatively well for our Novell network. However, it required that all of the traffic be routed. This is fine for NetWare, which uses protocols such as RIP to automatically configure routes. However, in order to pass TCP/IP data, it would be necessary to break our class C range of IP addresses into a number of smaller subnets. This would result in a net loss of available IP addresses and add to the bandwidth problem.
With the wireless links, we were able to set up a much more flexible network. Since the links can be configured as either point-to-point or multi-point, it was possible to create a single, virtual-bridged radio network comprised of numerous locations. At the education center, we have OMNI-directional antennas which are configured as repeaters. Because the remote locations use directional links and point directly at the education center, they cannot communicate directly with one another. To alleviate this problem, the education-center bridge is configured to forward all traffic not intended for its own Ethernet LAN segment back out to the wireless network. Thus, while one elementary school cannot communicate with another elementary school directly, they can communicate by making an extra hop through the OMNI. This happens transparently in the hardware and is unseen by the network devices. With the exception of a single remote school (Dimondale), we were able to connect every location into a single wireless network. We used a repeater at the west campus area to connect this auxiliary school to the larger network. At this location, there are essentially two different wireless links plugged into the same hub. Although the link to Dimondale is actually a totally different wireless network, it appears, logically, to be part of the larger wireless network. The complete physical wireless network looks something like the picture in Figure 2.
With the bridging topology, we were able to maintain our Novell communications while expanding our TCP/IP functionality. For our TCP/IP services, we deployed a number of Linux proxy servers. These Linux servers are Pentium computers, ranging from Pentium 90s to Pentium 150s. They have between 32 and 64MB of parity RAM and IDE hard disks from 850MB to 2.1GB. They each have two D-Link NE2000 compatible Ethernet cards. The machines have a minimal Slackware 3.2 distribution installed, are configured as IP Masquerading firewalls and act as Internet gateways for our remote LAN segments. Also running on the servers is the Squid Internet Object Cache software, which allows us to cache HTTP, FTP, GOPHER and WAIS data on the server. Most of the other Linux software, such as login shells, FTP services, etc. have been disabled or restricted to a single management machine.
Between IP Masquerading and the Squid Object Cache, we were able to provide the necessary Internet services. With masquerading, we gave access to our 900 or so clients with only 7 true IP addresses. In addition, we can configure the firewall to allow different types of access to different workstations. For example, we might wish to configure the firewall in such a way as to restrict a computer lab while allowing a teacher station access. Also, because of the nature of the firewall, our clients are more or less unreachable by the outside world, thereby conferring a certain amount of security. Using the standard ipfwadm program, there are a number of possible configuration options.
Overall, the speed of the wireless links has been quite good. When the network first went up, we began gathering information about the speed and reliability of the links. To do this, a script was set up which runs a program called tcpspray to transfer 100KB of data to each location and measure the amount of time it takes to get there. The script runs constantly on a management station and tests each of the links every 15 minutes. Below is the actual output of one of our wireless links—in this case, between the education center and the senior high school:
Tue May 27 18:19:35 EDT 1997 Sycamore/HS: Transmitted 102400 bytes in 0.551536 seconds (181.312 kbytes/s)
Running this same test to a machine connected via PPP on an external USR 28.8k, we had the following results:
Tue May 27 18:25:43 EDT 1997 PPP: Transmitted 102400 bytes in 47.041576 seconds (2.126 kbytes/s)Admittedly, that PPP link should be running a little bit faster. I had expected to see throughput more along the lines of 3K, or possibly 4KB/s. Lastly, to compare it to another popular networking option, take a look at the throughput attained by a 10MB/s LanCity cable modem which I have connected to my personal Internet host:
Mon May 26 18:28:13 EDT 1997 Cable Modem: Transmitted 102400 bytes in 0.294357 seconds (339.724 kbytes/s)Bear in mind that these figures don't give you the whole picture. For example, the speed of the throughput varies from moment to moment by as much as 50%. All it takes is a split-second delay in the network to give a very poor reading. The readings I have provided represent an average throughput. Also, the speed of the computers sending and receiving the information makes quite a difference. All the machines used for the above testing are running Linux, but if they were not, the speed of the TCP/IP stack would also be a factor. In addition, it's important to note that certain services have more data overhead than others. Thus, performance might vary depending upon the service you are using. FTP, for example, runs at roughly the same speed as a tcpspray test.
In addition to speed, controlling Internet access is important. As a public school district, we need to have a certain amount of accountability as to what our students do and see on the Internet. To this end, we have made the use of the Squid Cache mandatory, allowing us to monitor the kinds of documents accessed, as well as require a valid user name and password to access the cache. By filtering all traffic for port 80 at the firewall, client workstations must use the cache to get WWW documents. Squid allows for the use of htpasswd style authentication, exactly like web server packages such as Apache. Using this authentication method, we can manage user access to the cache and to the World Wide Web. In addition, Squid allows us to configure access control lists, which will disallow certain “known naughty” sites that might endanger the innocence of our students.
At each of the individual LAN segments, we have a configuration similar to the picture in Figure 3. The wireless link is plugged into a small hub, which is also connected to the NetWare server and Linux box. The NetWare server is responsible for routing the IPX/SPX traffic and the Linux box is responsible for the TCP/IP traffic. All of the client workstations are configured for the 10.0.0.0 network and have their Linux box set as the default gateway. When a client sends TCP/IP traffic, it goes through the Linux box, out through the wireless link, to the education center and eventually out to the Internet.
On the Novell side, configuration is quite simple. We simply left the original Ethernet card at its original settings and configured a second Ethernet card for the wireless LAN. Naturally, I had to configure this second card with the network number 3141, so I could call it the “Pi in the Sky”. We must all seek humor where we can.
The proxy servers have been working quite well. Our first Linux proxy server, which was based on kernel version 2.0.18, has run for months and never crashed. Even with the ever-demanding (and ever-popular) PointCast traffic, it has performed wonderfully. With Squid, all documents that pass through the proxy are cached, allowing subsequent requests to come from the proxy server at near-Ethernet speeds. This reduces traffic across our Internet connection, as well as across the Internet in general. In a school situation, this works very well. For example, when a teacher wants to visit a certain web site with the whole computer lab, he simply views the pages the night before. When the class comes in the next day, the documents are served very quickly, making it possible for a whole class to browse the site at Ethernet speed. With the combination of helpful utilities such as wget, teachers can recursively cache a whole site with a simple shell command.
Using Linux has allowed us to put together a greatly improved network and provide Internet access to all our workstations using limited resources. We have increased our WAN bandwidth from a painfully slow 56K to a respectable 4MB/s. With the help of the Squid Internet Object Cache, we have become responsible Internet citizens and reduced unnecessary net traffic. Now, we can even call all of our e-mail airmail. None of this would have been possible without the effort of the hundreds of people who contribute to Linux every day. In education, in particular, Linux fits perfectly—it's cheap, it' s flexible and it's powerful.
Practical Task Scheduling Deployment
July 20, 2016 12:00 pm CDT
One of the best things about the UNIX environment (aside from being stable and efficient) is the vast array of software tools available to help you do your job. Traditionally, a UNIX tool does only one thing, but does that one thing very well. For example, grep is very easy to use and can search vast amounts of data quickly. The find tool can find a particular file or files based on all kinds of criteria. It's pretty easy to string these tools together to build even more powerful tools, such as a tool that finds all of the .log files in the /home directory and searches each one for a particular entry. This erector-set mentality allows UNIX system administrators to seem to always have the right tool for the job.
Cron traditionally has been considered another such a tool for job scheduling, but is it enough? This webinar considers that very question. The first part builds on a previous Geek Guide, Beyond Cron, and briefly describes how to know when it might be time to consider upgrading your job scheduling infrastructure. The second part presents an actual planning and implementation framework.
Join Linux Journal's Mike Diehl and Pat Cameron of Help Systems.
Free to Linux Journal readers.Register Now!
- SUSE LLC's SUSE Manager
- My +1 Sword of Productivity
- Non-Linux FOSS: Caffeine!
- Managing Linux Using Puppet
- Control Your Linux Desktop with D-Bus
- Download "Linux Management with Red Hat Satellite: Measuring Business Impact and ROI"
- Doing for User Space What We Did for Kernel Space
- SuperTuxKart 0.9.2 Released
- Murat Yener and Onur Dundar's Expert Android Studio (Wrox)
- Google's SwiftShader Released
With all the industry talk about the benefits of Linux on Power and all the performance advantages offered by its open architecture, you may be considering a move in that direction. If you are thinking about analytics, big data and cloud computing, you would be right to evaluate Power. The idea of using commodity x86 hardware and replacing it every three years is an outdated cost model. It doesn’t consider the total cost of ownership, and it doesn’t consider the advantage of real processing power, high-availability and multithreading like a demon.
This ebook takes a look at some of the practical applications of the Linux on Power platform and ways you might bring all the performance power of this open architecture to bear for your organization. There are no smoke and mirrors here—just hard, cold, empirical evidence provided by independent sources. I also consider some innovative ways Linux on Power will be used in the future.Get the Guide