Building a Transparent Firewall with Linux, Part IV
I've been writing a multipart series on building a transparent (bridging) firewall using Linux. Specifically, I'm using the distribution OpenWrt running on a Linksys WRT54GL broadband router, a hardware choice driven mainly by my curiosity about the WRT54GL's built-in five-port Ethernet switch and its ability to run OpenWrt Linux.
So far I've covered installing OpenWrt, recompiling a new OpenWrt image with iptables' bridging functionality enabled and configuring networking using OpenWrt's uci (Unified Configuration Interface) command.
This month, I review the example network topology and finally begin configuring iptables, the heart of the whole undertaking. Before I do so, however, there are a few OpenWrt housecleaning tasks to get out of the way: tweaking the kernel and network configurations, and disabling OpenWrt's native firewall system.
OpenWrt Performance as a Transparent Firewall
In researching this article, I had a nasty surprise. Although in the past I had seen articles and how-tos on making transparent firewalls with OpenWrt, this mode of operation is not supported by default in the Kamikaze and Backfire releases. Reportedly, running iptables in bridging mode under OpenWrt reduces overall system performance by a whopping 40%!
I proceeded writing this series anyhow, because I wanted to see for myself just how big an effect this is, and it seemed to me that the series still would be useful just for the sake of explaining how to install and use OpenWrt, and for explaining how to write iptables rules for transparent firewalls. However, at several points, I've written of my doubts as to the example OpenWrt/WRT54GL's suitability for high-bandwidth/high-availability settings.
Also, hopefully without sounding too grandiose, I hoped that by spurring greater interest in OpenWrt's flawed capability, I might encourage someone to get to the bottom of why OpenWrt performance plunges when run with iptables in bridging mode. Surely there's a reason that this not terribly new kernel feature is problematic in OpenWrt!
I say all this because I want to be clear that although transparent Linux firewalls in general constitute an interesting and useful technology, the specific combination of a $65 broadband router plus OpenWrt running in this mode is probably suitable only in a home or lab setting, not for any situation where you need to move large volumes of packets very quickly and very reliably (which is hopefully unnecessary for me to say, given that the WRT54GL is marketed to home users in the first place). I say it also so you understand why you have to go through the hoops of recompiling the OpenWrt image and editing /etc/sysctl.conf to get iptables bridging working in OpenWrt.
Recompiling the OpenWrt image with CONFIG_BRIDGE_NETFILTER=y set in the Linux kernel is the first of two steps in enabling iptables' bridging mode in OpenWrt. The second step is either to delete the following parameters in /etc/sysctl.conf or set each of them to “1” rather than “0”:
net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-arptables=0 net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-ip6tables=0 net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-iptables=0
In addition, I need to correct an error I made in the OpenWrt network configuration I showed you last time. You may recall that I changed OpenWrt's default configuration, such that all Ethernet ports were assigned to a single VLAN and bridge.
But possibly due to the way the Linux kernel interacts with the bridge hardware on my Linksys WRT54GL, with that configuration, I find that iptables ignores inter-VLAN traffic—that is, traffic between ports on the same VLAN. In order to get iptables to work properly on this hardware and on OpenWrt, I actually need two VLANs: one corresponding to my “uplink” (the Ethernet port connected to the outside world) and my “LAN” (everything else). These two VLANs, however, are still associated with the same bridge interface.
To create a separate VLAN for my uplink port, which is my WRT54GL's “WAN” port (or “port 4” to OpenWrt), I issue these commands on my router:
root@sugartongs:/etc/config# uci set network.eth0_1=switch_vlan root@sugartongs:/etc/config# uci set network.eth0_1.device="eth0" root@sugartongs:/etc/config# uci set network.eth0_1.vlan="1" root@sugartongs:/etc/config# uci set network.eth0_1.ports="4 5"
(Port 5, you'll recall, is a virtual port associated with the kernel, that must be included in all “ports” statements in OpenWrt network configurations, which is why our “...ports” statement is set to “4 5” rather than just “4”.)
To remove the WAN port from the other VLAN (eth0_0) I set up last time, I use this command:
root@sugartongs:/etc/config# uci set network.eth0_0.ports="0 1 2 3 5"
Next, in my bridge configuration, for the network I named “lan”, I associate both VLANs with the bridge:
root@sugartongs:/etc/config# uci set ↪network.lan.ifname="eth0.0 eth0.1"
And finally, I list my new network configuration to make sure everything's correct, commit the changes and reboot:
root@sugartongs:/etc/config# uci show network root@sugartongs:/etc/config# uci commit root@sugartongs:/etc/config# reboot
Listing 1 shows what the resulting /etc/config/network file looks like.
|Raspi-Sump||Dec 16, 2014|
|diff -u: What's New in Kernel Development||Dec 12, 2014|
|Non-Linux FOSS: Don't Type All Those Words!||Dec 10, 2014|
|Computing without a Computer||Dec 08, 2014|
|Autokey: Shorthand for Typists||Dec 04, 2014|
|How Can We Get Business to Care about Freedom, Openness and Interoperability?||Dec 03, 2014|
- Readers' Choice Awards 2014
- diff -u: What's New in Kernel Development
- Cooking with Linux - Serious Cool, Sysadmin Style!
- How Can We Get Business to Care about Freedom, Openness and Interoperability?
- Synchronize Your Life with ownCloud
- Days Between Dates?
- Computing without a Computer
- Non-Linux FOSS: Don't Type All Those Words!
- Autokey: Shorthand for Typists