Linux Distribution Chart
For this LJ distro chart, we selected distributions and categories based on suggestions from Linux Journal editors and readers, and gathered the information from each distro's Web site and DistroWatch.com. Linux Journal readers shared their comments, favorite distributions and thoughts about each distro's best use in our readers' poll on LinuxJournal.com. We include a few readers' comments here with the chart, but be sure to visit www.linuxjournal.com/content/what-each-distribution-best and www.linuxjournal.com/content/which-linux-distribution-do-you-use-most-frequently-0 for many, many more comments and to add your own feedback—we're sure we left out at least a few people's favorites! Note that under the “Best for” category on the chart, all distributions were voted as favorites on both desktops and servers, so in the interest of avoiding repetition, we left those out. Also note that in the on-line readers' poll for “Most Frequently Used Distro”, 2% voted for “other”.
| Distribution | Latest Stable Release (Date) | First Release | Release Cycle | Support Lifecycle | Based on | Developed by | Sponsored by | Package Format | Package Management | Default Desktop Environment(s) (Version) | Linux Kernel | Default Filesystem | Official Ports | Derivative Distributions | Most Frequently Used (Readers' Poll) | Best For (Readers' Poll) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arch Linux | 2009.08 (08/10/2009) | 03/11/2002 | 3–4 months (follows kernel releases) | None (rolling releases) | None | Aaron Griffin & Community | None | tar.gz | Arch Build System, Packman | None (user selected | 2.6.32.3 | None (user selected | x86, x86-64 | None | 7% | Ease of upgrade, education, older hardware |
| CentOS | 5.4 (10/21/2009) | 12/2003 | 2 years (follows Red Hat Enterprise Linux) | 7 years | Red Hat Enterprise Linux (open-source SRPMs) | CentOS Project | None | rpm | RPM, YUM, up2date | GNOME (2.16) | 2.6.18 | ext3 | x86, x86-64 | None | 2% | Ease of installation, proprietary hardware support, security |
| Debian | 5.0 “Lenny” (02/14/2009) | 08/16/2003 | 2 years (beginning with 6.0 “Squeeze”) | 3 years | None | Debian Project | None | deb | dpkg, APT, Synaptic | GNOME (2.22), alternate CDs: KDE, Xfce, LXDE | 2.6.26 | ext3 | x86, Alpha, SPARC, PowerPC, SPARC, PowerPC, ARM, MIPS, Itanium, HP PA-RISC, s/390, AMD64, ARM EABI | Ubuntu, Knoppix, Damn Small Linux, Linspire, Maemo | 9% | Ease of upgrade, getting support, security |
| Fedora | 12 “Constantine” (11/17/2009) | 11/05/2003 | 6 months (approximate) | 13 months (approximate) | Historically: Red Hat Linux | Fedora Project | Red Hat | rpm | RPM, YUM, PackageKit | GNOME (2.28), Fedora Spins: KDE, LXDE, Xfce | 2.6.31.5 | ext4 | x86, x86-64, PowerPC | Red Hat Enterprise Linux, Yellow Dog Linux, Moblin | 9% | Ease of installation, new users, security |
| Gentoo | None (versionless) | 03/31/2002 | Rolling releases | None (rolling releases) | None | Gentoo Foundation | None | ebuild | Portage | None (user selected) | 2.6.32 | None (user selected) | Stable: x86, x86-64, PA-RISC, PowerPC, SPARC 64 bit, DEC Alpha; Development: MIPS, PS3, SystemZ/s390, ARM, SuperH | Sabayon | 4% | Education, older hardware, real-time apps |
| Linux Mint | 8 “Helena” (11/28/2009) | 08/27/2006 | 6 months (follows Ubuntu) | 18 months (follows Ubuntu) | Ubuntu | Linux Mint Team | None | deb | dpkg, APT, MintInstall/MintUpdate | GNOME (2.28); Community: KDE, Xfce, Fluxbox | 2.6.31 | ext3 | x86, x86-64 | None | 7% | Ease of installation, multimedia, new users |
| Mandriva | 2010 (11/03/2009) | 07/23/1998 | 6 months | 18 months (base updates); 12 months (desktop updates); 24 months (server updates) | Historically: Red Hat Linux | Mandriva S.A. | Mandriva S.A. | rpm | urpmi/rpmdrake | KDE (4.3.2), GNOME (2.28.1), Xfce & twm | 2.6.31.12 | ext4 | i586, i386, x86-64, PowerPC, MIPS, ARM | PCLinuxOS | 6% | Ease of installation, education, new users |
| Mepis | 8.0.15 (01/12/2010) | 05/10/2003 | Unspecified (6 months to 1 year) | Unspecified | Debian/Ubuntu | MEPIS LLC | MEPIS LLC & Community | deb | dpkg, APT | KDE (3.5) | 2.6.22.14 | ReiserFS, ext3 | x86, x86-64 | SimplyMEPIS, antiX | 2% | Ease of installation, new users, olderhardware |
| openSUSE | 11.2 (11/12/2009) | 03/1994 | 8 months | 2 releases + 2 months | Historically: SUSE Linux | openSUSE Project | Novell | rpm | RPM, YaST, Zypper | GNOME (2.28), KDE (4.3.1) | 2.6.31 | ext4 | x86, x86-64 | SUSE Linux Enterprise | 11% (with SUSE Linux Enterprise) | Ease of installation, new users, proprietary hardware support |
| PCLinuxOS | 2009.2 (06/30/2009) | 11/2003 | Unspecified | Unspecified | Historically: Mandriva | PCLinuxOS Development Team | None | rpm | APT-RPM, RPM, Synaptic | KDE (3.5.10) | 2.6.16 | None | x86 | None | 4% | Ease of installation, multimedia, new users |
| Puppy Linux | 4.3.1 (10/17/2009) | 06/18/2003 | Unspecified | Unspecified | None | Puppy Community | Puppy Foundation | .pup, .pet | PetGet | JWM/IceWM | 2.6.30.5 | SquashFS (ext2) | None | None | 1% | Ease of installation, new users, older hardware |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux | 5.4 (09/02/2009) | 03/26/2002 | 18–24 months | 7 years | Fedora | Red Hat | Red Hat | rpm | RPM, YUM | GNOME (2.16) | 2.6.18 | ext3 | IA-32, x86-64, PowerPC, i386, ia64, s390, s390x | CentOS | 1% | Getting support, proprietary hardware support, security |
| Slackware | 13.0 (08/26/2009) | 07/16/1993 | Unspecified | N/A | Historically: Softlanding Linux System | Patrick Volkerding & Community | Slackware Linux, Inc. | txz/tgz (tarball) | installpkg/upgradepkg (pkgtool) | Blackbox, Fluxbox, FVWM, KDE (4.2.14), WMaker, Xfce; Community: GNOME | 2.6.29.6 | ext4 | x86, x86-64, IBM S/39 | Slam64, SLAX, VectorLinux | 4% | Education, older hardware, security |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise | 11 (03/24/2009) | 03/1994 | Major: 24–36 months; Service Packs: 9–12 months | 5–7 years | openSUSE | Novell | Novell | rpm | YaST, Zypper | KDE (4.1), GNOME (2.24) | 2.6.27.19 | ext3, JFS, ReiserFS | XFSIA-32, x86-64, PowerPC, Itanium | None | 11% (with openSUSE) | Getting support, proprietary hardware support, security |
| Ubuntu | 9.10 “Karmic Koala” (10/29/09); long-term support “Hardy Heron” (04/24/2008) | 10/20/2004 | Biannually (April/October) | 18 months; long-term support: 3 years for desktop, 5 years for server | Debian | Ubuntu Community | Canonical | deb | dpkg, APT, Synaptic, Ubuntu Software Center | GNOME (2.28) | 2.6.31; long-term support: 2.6.24 | ext4; long-term support: ext3 | x86, x86-64, ARM, SPARC | Kubuntu (KDE), Edubuntu, Xubuntu (Xfce), Ubuntu Studio, Linux Mint, Crunchbang, Ubuntu Netbook Edition | 31% (any flavor) | Ease of installation, getting support, new users |
| Yellow Dog | 6.2 (06/29/2009) | 1999 | Unspecified | Whichever is longer—1 year from launch or 3 months from new version | RHEL, CentOS | Fixstars Solutions | Fixstars Solutions | rpm | YUM | Enlightenment, GNOME (2.16.0), KDE (3.5.4) | 2.6.29 | ext3, JFS, ReiserFS | XFSPower | None | 0% | Gaming, older hardware, proprietary hardware support |
Justin Ryan is a Contributing Editor for Linux Journal.
Realizing the promise of Apache® Hadoop® requires the effective deployment of compute, memory, storage and networking to achieve optimal results. With its flexibility and multitude of options, it is easy to over or under provision the server infrastructure, resulting in poor performance and high TCO. Join us for an in depth, technical discussion with industry experts from leading Hadoop and server companies who will provide insights into the key considerations for designing and deploying an optimal Hadoop cluster.
Sponsored by AMD
Built-in forensics, incident response, and security with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Every security policy provides guidance and requirements for ensuring adequate protection of information and data, as well as high-level technical and administrative security requirements for a system in a given environment. Traditionally, providing security for a system focuses on the confidentiality of the information on it. However, protecting the data integrity and system and data availability is just as important. For example, when processing United States intelligence information, there are three attributes that require protection: confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
Learn more about catching the bad guy in this free white paper.
Sponsored by DLT Solutions
| Designing Electronics with Linux | May 22, 2013 |
| Dynamic DNS—an Object Lesson in Problem Solving | May 21, 2013 |
| Using Salt Stack and Vagrant for Drupal Development | May 20, 2013 |
| Making Linux and Android Get Along (It's Not as Hard as It Sounds) | May 16, 2013 |
| Drupal Is a Framework: Why Everyone Needs to Understand This | May 15, 2013 |
| Home, My Backup Data Center | May 13, 2013 |
- New Products
- Linux Systems Administrator
- Senior Perl Developer
- Technical Support Rep
- UX Designer
- Web & UI Developer (JavaScript & j Query)
- Designing Electronics with Linux
- Dynamic DNS—an Object Lesson in Problem Solving
- Making Linux and Android Get Along (It's Not as Hard as It Sounds)
- Using Salt Stack and Vagrant for Drupal Development
Enter to Win an Adafruit Pi Cobbler Breakout Kit for Raspberry Pi

It's Raspberry Pi month at Linux Journal. Each week in May, Adafruit will be giving away a Pi-related prize to a lucky, randomly drawn LJ reader. Winners will be announced weekly.
Fill out the fields below to enter to win this week's prize-- a Pi Cobbler Breakout Kit for Raspberry Pi.
Congratulations to our winners so far:
- 5-8-13, Pi Starter Pack: Jack Davis
- 5-15-13, Pi Model B 512MB RAM: Patrick Dunn
- 5-21-13, Prototyping Pi Plate Kit: Philip Kirby
- Next winner announced on 5-27-13!
Featured Jobs
| Linux Systems Administrator | Houston and Austin, Texas | Host Gator |
| Senior Perl Developer | Austin, Texas | Host Gator |
| Technical Support Rep | Houston and Austin, Texas | Host Gator |
| UX Designer | Austin, Texas | Host Gator |
| Web & UI Developer (JavaScript & j Query) | Austin, Texas | Host Gator |
Free Webinar: Hadoop
How to Build an Optimal Hadoop Cluster to Store and Maintain Unlimited Amounts of Data Using Microservers
Realizing the promise of Apache® Hadoop® requires the effective deployment of compute, memory, storage and networking to achieve optimal results. With its flexibility and multitude of options, it is easy to over or under provision the server infrastructure, resulting in poor performance and high TCO. Join us for an in depth, technical discussion with industry experts from leading Hadoop and server companies who will provide insights into the key considerations for designing and deploying an optimal Hadoop cluster.
Some of key questions to be discussed are:
- What is the “typical” Hadoop cluster and what should be installed on the different machine types?
- Why should you consider the typical workload patterns when making your hardware decisions?
- Are all microservers created equal for Hadoop deployments?
- How do I plan for expansion if I require more compute, memory, storage or networking?




7 hours 59 min ago
18 hours 40 min ago
1 day 26 min ago
1 day 43 min ago
1 day 2 hours ago
1 day 4 hours ago
1 day 11 hours ago
1 day 11 hours ago
1 day 13 hours ago
1 day 19 hours ago