Linux System Administration
There was recently a bit of traffic on the Usenet newsgroups about the need for (or lack of) an undelete command for Linux. If you were to type rm * tmp instead of rm *tmp and such a command were available, you could quickly recover your files.
The main problem with this idea from a filesystem standpoint involves the differences between the way DOS handles its filesystems and the way Linux handles its filesystems.
Let's look at how DOS handles its filesystems. When DOS writes a file to a hard drive (or a floppy drive) it begins by finding the first block that is marked “free” in the File Allocation Table (FAT). Data is written to that block, the next free block is searched for and written to, and so on until the file has been completely written. The problem with this approach is that the file can be in blocks that are scattered all over the drive. This scattering is known as fragmentation and can seriously degrade your filesystem's performance, because now the hard drive has to look all over the place for file fragments. When files are deleted, the space is marked “free” in the FAT and the blocks can be used by another file.
The good thing about this is that, if you delete a file that is out near the end of your drive, the data in those blocks may not be overwritten for months. In this case, it is likely that you will be able to get your data back for a reasonable amount of time afterwards.
Linux (actually, the second extended filesystem that is almost universally used under Linux) is slightly smarter in its approach to fragmentation. It uses several techniques to reduce fragmentation, involving segmenting the filesystem into independently-managed groups, temporarily reserving large chunks of contiguous space for files, and starting the search for new blocks to be added to a file from the current end of the file, rather than from the start of the filesystem. This greatly decreases fragmentation and makes file access much faster. The only case in which significant fragmentation occurs is when large files are written to an almost-full filesystem, because the filesystem is probably left with lots of free spaces too small to tuck files into nicely.
Because of this policy for finding empty blocks for files, when a file is deleted, the (probably large) contiguous space it occupied becomes a likely place for new files to be written. Also, because Linux is a multi-user, multitasking operating system, there is often more file-creating activity going on than under DOS, which means that those empty spaces where files used to be are more likely to be used for new files. “Undeleteability” has been traded off for a very fast filesystem that normally never needs to be defragmented.
The easiest answer to the problem is to put something in the filesystem that says a file was just deleted, but there are four problems with this approach:
You would need to write a new filesystem or modify a current one (i.e. hack the kernel).
How long should a file be marked “deleted”?
What happens when a hard drive is filled with files that are “deleted”?
What kind of performance loss and fragmentation will occur when files have to be written around “deleted” space?
Each of these questions can be answered and worked around. If you want to do it, go right ahead and try—the ext2 filesystem has space reserved to help you. But I have some solutions that require zero lines of C source code.
I have two similar solutions, and your job as a system administrator is to determine which method is best for you. The first method is a user-by-user no-root-needed approach, and the other is a system-wide approach implemented by root for all (or almost all) users.
The user-by-user approach can be done by anyone with shell access and it doesn't require root privileges, only a few changes to your .profile and .login or .bashrc files and a bit of drive space. The idea is that you alias the rm command to move the files to another directory. Then, when you log in the next time, those files that were moved are purged from the filesystem using the real /bin/rm command. Because the files are not actually deleted by the user, they are accessible until the next login. If you're using the bash shell, add this to your .bashrc file:
alias waste='/bin/rm' alias rm='mv $1 ~/.rm'
and in your
.profile: if [ -x ~/.rm ]; then /bin/rm -r ~/.rm mkdir ~/.rm chmod og-r ~/.rm else mkdir ~/.rm chmod og-r ~/.rm fi
can be done by any user
only takes up user space
/bin/rm is still available as the command waste
automatically gets rid of old files every time you log in.
takes up filesystem space (bad if you have a quota)
not easy to implement for many users at once
files get deleted each login (bad if you log in twice at the same time)
|Nativ Disc||Sep 23, 2016|
|Android Browser Security--What You Haven't Been Told||Sep 22, 2016|
|The Many Paths to a Solution||Sep 21, 2016|
|Synopsys' Coverity||Sep 20, 2016|
|Naztech's Roadstar 5 Car Charger||Sep 16, 2016|
|RPi-Powered pi-topCEED Makes the Case as a Low-Cost Modular Learning Desktop||Sep 15, 2016|
- Android Browser Security--What You Haven't Been Told
- Download "Linux Management with Red Hat Satellite: Measuring Business Impact and ROI"
- Nativ Disc
- The Many Paths to a Solution
- Naztech's Roadstar 5 Car Charger
- Synopsys' Coverity
- Securing the Programmer
- RPi-Powered pi-topCEED Makes the Case as a Low-Cost Modular Learning Desktop
- Glass Padding
- Identity: Our Last Stand
With all the industry talk about the benefits of Linux on Power and all the performance advantages offered by its open architecture, you may be considering a move in that direction. If you are thinking about analytics, big data and cloud computing, you would be right to evaluate Power. The idea of using commodity x86 hardware and replacing it every three years is an outdated cost model. It doesn’t consider the total cost of ownership, and it doesn’t consider the advantage of real processing power, high-availability and multithreading like a demon.
This ebook takes a look at some of the practical applications of the Linux on Power platform and ways you might bring all the performance power of this open architecture to bear for your organization. There are no smoke and mirrors here—just hard, cold, empirical evidence provided by independent sources. I also consider some innovative ways Linux on Power will be used in the future.Get the Guide