Someone is *Wrong* On The Internet
This is a blog post about blog post comments. Not just comments on Linux Journal, but blog post comments in general, especially about blogs that support 'Anonymouse' contributions.
I've been a Linux geek for a long time. We won't discuss how long, but Get Off Of My Lawn!
When I worked at Los Alamos National Laboratory (for a long time, but again, we won't go into that) we had an internal mailing list named NMUG, for Network Manager's User Group. Fully two thirds of the list members were Linux geeks, gurus, HPC whizes, kernel developers, admins, etc. The others came from, you know, the Windows world. We had some wonderful flame wars! Just yesterday I received a message via Facebook from one of my ex-LANL colleagues who still works there saying, and I quote:
Today on NMUG it was lamented that it's impossible to have a proper flame war without you.
I've also run high-volume, high-visibility, highly contentious blogs in the past. See LANL, The Real Story as an example.
All of this is a long-winded way of saying that I am quite familiar with the spittle-laden delivery style that some of our more passionate Linux Journal comment providers use when trying to make their point on whatever issue has them all worked up. The authority on this style of internet information exchange, IMO, is Xkcd.
Now please don't misunderstand, I am not attempting to discourage this style of flaming delivery -- quite the opposite. It is often most entertaining. In fact, let me share with you one of my favorite "throw some gasoline on the fire" flaming techniques. Reply to a flame by making a spelling or grammar correction in the offending comment. Works like a charm!
What prompted this thread, you might ask? Well, I was reading Michael Read's recent KDE4: It hurt, but did it work? article, and was tickled by the fervor of the anti/pro camps surrounding the great KDE vs. Gnome debate. Did the anti-KDE flamers win over any converts to whatever was being claimed as a superior desktop environment? I doubt it. Did it make for entertaining reading? I think so.
So, how about if we start a new discussion on the button placement in Ubuntu Lucid 10.04? No? How about the new default color scheme then?
Fast/Flexible Linux OS Recovery
On Demand Now
In this live one-hour webinar, learn how to enhance your existing backup strategies for complete disaster recovery preparedness using Storix System Backup Administrator (SBAdmin), a highly flexible full-system recovery solution for UNIX and Linux systems.
Join Linux Journal's Shawn Powers and David Huffman, President/CEO, Storix, Inc.
Free to Linux Journal readers.Register Now!
- Download "Linux Management with Red Hat Satellite: Measuring Business Impact and ROI"
- ServersCheck's Thermal Imaging Camera Sensor
- The Italian Army Switches to LibreOffice
- Linux Mint 18
- Petros Koutoupis' RapidDisk
- Oracle vs. Google: Round 2
- The FBI and the Mozilla Foundation Lock Horns over Known Security Hole
- Privacy and the New Math
- Ben Rady's Serverless Single Page Apps (The Pragmatic Programmers)
Until recently, IBM’s Power Platform was looked upon as being the system that hosted IBM’s flavor of UNIX and proprietary operating system called IBM i. These servers often are found in medium-size businesses running ERP, CRM and financials for on-premise customers. By enabling the Power platform to run the Linux OS, IBM now has positioned Power to be the platform of choice for those already running Linux that are facing scalability issues, especially customers looking at analytics, big data or cloud computing.
￼Running Linux on IBM’s Power hardware offers some obvious benefits, including improved processing speed and memory bandwidth, inherent security, and simpler deployment and management. But if you look beyond the impressive architecture, you’ll also find an open ecosystem that has given rise to a strong, innovative community, as well as an inventory of system and network management applications that really help leverage the benefits offered by running Linux on Power.Get the Guide