It turns out that hard infrastructure is softer than the name suggests. This is good, since I want to make the case that both LInux and the Net are forms of infrastructure no less legitimate than water, electricity, roads, sewers and waste collection.
Understanding Infrastructure [1] was my first posting on this subject. This is my second. More will come.
So far I've arranged my findings in the forms of photo essays. Here's one on sidewalk signage in Cambridge [2]. Here's one of Boston [3] on the day of its huge annual Boston Marathon. And here's one on the Minuteman Bikeway [4] that runs from Cambridge to Lexington.
Here are my main provisional conclusions, so far:
Sound familiar?
I believe it's no coincidence that we "build" code, that we have "architects" and "designers". The similarities between infrastructural software and public infrastructure are many. I'll keep exploring them. Expect a book eventually. Meanwhile, enjoy the pictures (and their captions, which comprise the essays). And share your thoughts below.
Meanwhile, start reading what Craig Burton is saying on his blog [5]: here [6], here [7], and here [8], so far.
__________________________
Doc Searls is Senior Editor of Linux Journal
Links:
[1] http://www.linuxjournal.com/content/understanding-infrastructure
[2] http://flickr.com/photos/docsearls/sets/72157604829541507/
[3] http://flickr.com/photos/docsearls/sets/72157604754219778/
[4] http://flickr.com/photos/docsearls/sets/72157604723259423/
[5] http://craigburton.com/
[6] http://craigburton.com/?p=731
[7] http://craigburton.com/?p=732
[8] http://craigburton.com/?p=735