Qt and Layouts
When I first started with graphics - I plotted pixels onto the screen by calculating a memory address and then poking the corresponding value. Times have changed since then. My murky history contains gwbasic, STOS, HiSoft Basic (compiled!), VisualBasic (numerous versions) until I found C and AES (on the Atari ST), Win16 (that is Windows 3.1) and even Presentation Manager on OS/2 (in the pre-Warp days).
Finding myself at university, I ran in to the Tru64 platform. That means Alphas and a Unix dialect that wasn't really compatible with anything that I knew. I dabbled with xlib and GTK but then some friends of mine and I set out to build KDE (the school provided FVWM). That meant building Qt along with loads of other stuff. This was a time when 64-bits was exotic - and guess what Tru64 runs on.
If our hands weren't full from just building the project, we also had to build it on a temporary drive as our accounts where too limited. That meant keeping the build times short enough to avoid the rm -rf that was run on the temporary area every night by sysop. We also had to place parts of the binaries in web directories and use symbolic links to get them into the tree spread over our home directories (there were some heated discussions when they realized what we did). The lesson for the sysop was to run quota on all disks - not just the /home tree...
Enough nostalgia, and on towards the point. Through all my previous experiences, graphics were placed at a specific pixel location. Usually relative to the upper left corner (i.e. base address of the framebuffer memory) or to the upper left corner of the current parent widget (i.e. inside a window). Windows complicated this by using dialog units, i.e. basing the locations on the font size.
Building Qt meant trying to use Qt, and this moved me beyond fixed pixel locations. I'm not claiming Qt was first, nor is best at this. As all great ideas, this must have been inspired from somewhere. In Qt (and GTK+ and most other modern toolkits) widgets (controls, elements, call them what you like) are placed in "layouts" and that is pure genious. By letting widgets hint about what size they want and then provide size policies, the layouts let the widgets negotiate for space.
Let's take an example. The very simple dialog shown at the start of this article consists of three widgets: a text editor (QLineEdit), a button (QPushButton) and a list widget (QListWidget). All of them are placed in a grid layout (QGridLayout) with the list spanning two columns.
All widgets provide a size hint, i.e. some size information to start negotiations from. The size hint is usually calculated from the contents of the widget. The interpretation of the size hint can be: don't care, I'd prefer this but can go either way, this is my absolute minimum or maximum size, or this is my final size. Also, the interpretation can be different depending on the direction (horizontal or vertical).
Returning to the example dialog, the widget easiest to understand is the list. It returns a small hint, but wants to expand as much as it can in either direction. It is happy with what it can get, but wants as much as possible. This size hint interpretation, or size policy is called Expanding and is used in both directions.
The text editor and button both return hints based on the contents. Height wise, they are both single-line widgets (in this context) so the height is Fixed. The eagle eyed reader might even notice that the text editor is not quite as high as the button and thus centered vertically.
Horizontally, the button provides a Minimum size so that its text does not get truncated while the text editor takes as much as it can (Expanding). All these policies and hints are balanced by the grid layout to provide the dialog shown.
So, what are the benefits to layouts? I can see three obvious cases:
- Internationalization - "Add" is "Addera" or "Lägg till" in Swedish. That requires a larger button - something that the layout can handle without requiring changes to the dialog.
- Screen resolution changes - i.e. larger fonts (in pixels) are handled automatically by layouts, again without needing to change the dialog.
- Stretchable user interfaces - if the list were to contain long file paths, the user can simply stretch the dialog to reveal the entire path and the dialog controls stretch with it. Without layouts you end up scrolling or simply missing out.
Johan Thelin is a consultant working with Qt, embedded and free
software. On-line, he is known as e8johan.
Practical Task Scheduling Deployment
July 20, 2016 12:00 pm CDT
One of the best things about the UNIX environment (aside from being stable and efficient) is the vast array of software tools available to help you do your job. Traditionally, a UNIX tool does only one thing, but does that one thing very well. For example, grep is very easy to use and can search vast amounts of data quickly. The find tool can find a particular file or files based on all kinds of criteria. It's pretty easy to string these tools together to build even more powerful tools, such as a tool that finds all of the .log files in the /home directory and searches each one for a particular entry. This erector-set mentality allows UNIX system administrators to seem to always have the right tool for the job.
Cron traditionally has been considered another such a tool for job scheduling, but is it enough? This webinar considers that very question. The first part builds on a previous Geek Guide, Beyond Cron, and briefly describes how to know when it might be time to consider upgrading your job scheduling infrastructure. The second part presents an actual planning and implementation framework.
Join Linux Journal's Mike Diehl and Pat Cameron of Help Systems.
Free to Linux Journal readers.Register Now!
- SUSE LLC's SUSE Manager
- My +1 Sword of Productivity
- Managing Linux Using Puppet
- Non-Linux FOSS: Caffeine!
- Murat Yener and Onur Dundar's Expert Android Studio (Wrox)
- SuperTuxKart 0.9.2 Released
- Doing for User Space What We Did for Kernel Space
- Google's SwiftShader Released
- Parsing an RSS News Feed with a Bash Script
- SourceClear Open
With all the industry talk about the benefits of Linux on Power and all the performance advantages offered by its open architecture, you may be considering a move in that direction. If you are thinking about analytics, big data and cloud computing, you would be right to evaluate Power. The idea of using commodity x86 hardware and replacing it every three years is an outdated cost model. It doesn’t consider the total cost of ownership, and it doesn’t consider the advantage of real processing power, high-availability and multithreading like a demon.
This ebook takes a look at some of the practical applications of the Linux on Power platform and ways you might bring all the performance power of this open architecture to bear for your organization. There are no smoke and mirrors here—just hard, cold, empirical evidence provided by independent sources. I also consider some innovative ways Linux on Power will be used in the future.Get the Guide