Use SSH to Cross a Suspect Host Securely
Recently at our local (Phoenix) Free Software Stammtisch, we were talking about security. I was surprised to find that no one else realized you can ssh safely across a compromised host to another machine behind it. A common example of “crossing” a host to get to another machine is accessing a machine on a private network protected by a firewall. The firewall is on the edge of the private network and provides the only means to get to the private network. So, you have to pass through the firewall to get to the private network.
But, what happens if the firewall has (or you believe it has) been compromised? How do you get to the private network without more security problems? It turns out that the answer is the same. You go through the firewall, but you do it in such a way that your connection remains secure even when the firewall itself may no longer be. The connection to the machine on the private network still can be made securely, even if you know the host you're passing through has been compromised and some rogue element has taken control of it.
As an example, let's say you need to connect from your Netbook to a server on your work's network. Let's also say the only way to get to your server is via a connection to your work's SSH/VPN gateway, but you think someone has broken into the gateway (yes, yes, get it off-line as soon as possible, but let's do that, and continue to be able to work and recover the gateway).
Now, let's consider an example scenario with three machines, named corresponding to what they are: Netbook, Gateway and Server. If you already understand SSH tunneling and want the short story, see the Short Story sidebar.
The short description is that you initiate a connection to Gateway. With that connection, you create a tunnel to port 22 on Server using the -L option to ssh:
You then can connect to a local port on Netbook that is the entry point for a tunnel that comes out at port 22 of the destination machine, which is Server. The tunneled connection is never decrypted on Gateway, so it stays secure.
For the long story, let's start with a description of some simple tunneling. The -L option on the command line allows you to create a tunnel:
ssh -N -f -L 2222:localhost:22 Gateway
The -L option allows you to specify the entry and exit points for a secure tunnel created by SSH. In the examples used in this article, it gets an argument that has three fields. The fields are separated by colons. The first field is the local port to bind (the local port to listen on). The next field is the host to connect to. This field is interpreted by the remote machine in the SSH connection, not by the local machine. The computer initiating the SSH connection doesn't need to know how to get to it. The third field is the port to connect to on the far end of the tunnel.
If you run this first command from Netbook, the command creates an SSH connection to Gateway and builds a tunnel that forwards port 2222 on Netbook to port 22 (the standard SSH port) on Gateway. The local port, 2222, can be almost any value as long as it's not already in use, although it must be above 1023 if you're not connecting as root. Now you can connect to SSH on Gateway by using that tunnel. Again, it's important to note that the tunnel destination hostname (the second field) is interpreted by Gateway, so “localhost” is instructing Gateway to connect to itself. localhost is not Netbook; it's Gateway. For more examples of using -L to create tunnels, see the SSH -L Examples sidebar.
The -N and -f options are useful when just creating a tunnel and not needing a remote shell. The -N option tells SSH not to run a remote command. The -f option puts the ssh command in the background, so you can regain control of the shell that ran the ssh command.
SSH -L Examples
The following command connects to remote_host and builds a tunnel from port 8888 of your desktop to port 80 of my Web server. You then can point a Web browser at http://localhost:8888/ to read my home page:
ssh -L 8888:www.LuftHans.com:80 remote_host
The following command connects to remote_host and builds a tunnel from port 9993 of your desktop to port 993 of mail_server's IMAP over SSL server. You then can configure your mail client to connect to port 9993 on your local system to read your mail:
ssh -L 9993:mail_server:993 remote_host
In both cases, the remote servers see the connection coming from remote_host, and in both cases, it doesn't matter whether your desktop can talk directly to the server at the far end of the tunnel.
Now, run the following command on Netbook:
ssh -p 2222 localhost
This second command creates an SSH connection to port 22 on Gateway by using the tunnel created in the first command. In the second command, localhost is the destination machine, so it's interpreted by the SSH client on Netbook, which means the ssh command running on Netbook connects to Netbook but on a nonstandard port. The tunnel is entered at port 2222 on Netbook and comes out at port 22 on Gateway. Because sshd is listening on port 22, the tunnel connects to the SSH dæmon on Gateway.
Presuming Gateway can connect to Server even though Netbook can't (remember Server is “firewalled” behind Gateway), it's also possible to create a tunnel to Server using a command such as:
ssh -a -N -f -L 3333:Server:22 Gateway
In this case, the tunnel from port 3333 on Netbook doesn't connect to Gateway, rather it connects to port 22 on Server. Gateway is essentially forwarding packets from Netbook to Server. Like the first command, the tunnel destination (the second field, Server) is interpreted by Gateway, so this tunnel connects to Server. Netbook doesn't need to know how to get to Server; Gateway handles the routing.
The -a option here makes sure authentication agent connections are not forwarded to Gateway. If you are concerned that Gateway is compromised, you don't want the attacker to gain control of your authentication agent connections. For more, see the Authentication Agents sidebar.
|smbclient Security for Windows Printing and File Transfer||Mar 28, 2017|
|How to Calculate Flash Storage TCO||Mar 27, 2017|
|Non-Linux FOSS: Don't Drink the Apple Kool-Aid; Brew Your Own!||Mar 27, 2017|
|Three EU Industries That Need HPC Now||Mar 25, 2017|
|HOSTING Monitoring Insights||Mar 24, 2017|
|FinTech and SAP HANA||Mar 24, 2017|
- Non-Linux FOSS: Don't Drink the Apple Kool-Aid; Brew Your Own!
- How to Calculate Flash Storage TCO
- smbclient Security for Windows Printing and File Transfer
- Two Ways GDPR Will Change Your Data Storage Solution
- Returning Values from Bash Functions
- Preseeding Full Disk Encryption
- Hodge Podge
- GRUB Boot from ISO
- Three EU Industries That Need HPC Now
- HOSTING Monitoring Insights
Pick up any e-commerce web or mobile app today, and you’ll be holding a mashup of interconnected applications and services from a variety of different providers. For instance, when you connect to Amazon’s e-commerce app, cookies, tags and pixels that are monitored by solutions like Exact Target, BazaarVoice, Bing, Shopzilla, Liveramp and Google Tag Manager track every action you take. You’re presented with special offers and coupons based on your viewing and buying patterns. If you find something you want for your birthday, a third party manages your wish list, which you can share through multiple social- media outlets or email to a friend. When you select something to buy, you find yourself presented with similar items as kind suggestions. And when you finally check out, you’re offered the ability to pay with promo codes, gifts cards, PayPal or a variety of credit cards.Get the Guide