From Issue #182June 2009
James Gray is Products Editor for Linux Journal.
Amazing how firefox has managed to stay on top of the game. In my opinion, it's because they stuck to what made them famous and kept doing it better. What sets them apart for me is the add-ons and plugins. FireFox, then, becomes a totally customizable browser. Not too many of those around. It's lightweight, too!
As a linux noob, this article is of great help in finding out about whats popular in the linux scene. Thanks for this article!!
Am off to read Linux in a nutshell...
Nagios is a superb product. Totally deserves it's top ranking.
Wow since 2008 Python is blooming non-STOP!!
It won again, and in other articles/forums it also won!
Here take a look:
Well, I can't agree more! ^__^
LONG LIVE PYTHON!!
In the category of "Favorite Primary Linux Distribution of Choice" it is a hard choice - Are we talking about servers or workstations? Maybe break them down next time. Like many people I love Ubuntu for my workstations but I use CentOS/Red Hat for my servers.
The fact that the second place for favourite IDE is "others", means that the options given were not good enough. I wonder why geany was not included.
I'd love to see the absolute number of votes, as well as the full ranking for each category. I'm especially intrigued about how many people voted for the Favorite Linux Distribution and what's Fedora's or OpenSuse ranking.
If voters are in the hundreds, this poll is definitely meaningless. If they are in the hundreds of thousands I'd give it more relevance.
Here are the top 10:
Ubuntu (any flavor, Kubuntu, Edubuntu, etc.) 44.98%
Red Hat 7.35%
Arch Linux 4.35%
(There were nearly 5,000 total participants in the survey.)
Carlie Fairchild is the publisher of Linux Journal.
I don't see what the appeal of Ubuntu is, don't people care about technical substance rather than flashy and if I may say so, ugly, desktops? I will keep using good ol' Red Hat-based Fedora (the best distro for gaming, and a leading-edge powerhouse that respects technology and doesn't care blindy about winning people over from Windows or Mac). Parlty since I consider Fedora the desktop king for not thinking that making you use a seperate version of the OS just to use KDE or XFCE instead of GNOME is a good idea. Other than that, great results!
It's true of course, Ubuntu on the desktop is not as techy as CentOS or Debian...but then, if Linux is to make the jump from "geek" to "user", it needs to get on a lot more desktops.
And to do that, it must be used by more and more non-technical end-users so that those at both ends of the scale (uber-tech and tech-less) can truly benefit by it's success.
The product needs to be excellent at both. And since Ubuntu "is" Linux in every sense, yet easy enough for a green end-user, I'd say you're getting what you want, and they're getting what they need.
To me, Ubuntu's rise is very exciting, and just what the doctor ordered. I'd bet it coincides with a growing number of Linux desktops more than it steals pure technical developers away from the other distros. But then, I have no real data to support that theory. I wonder if Linux Journal does?
Ubuntu has the potential to introduce Linux to non-Linux users. And isn't that what we want?
Early on, RedHat abandoned the post of desktop champion in favor of the server. They went where the $$ were to develop for a smaller, but critical market. And they did a good job of it.
Ubuntu on the other hand, targeted developing nations' hunger for a low or zero-cost alternative to Micro-Rip-Off's bug-ridden abomination for user's desktops. And they did a good job of that.
If Linux Mint would have been an option, it would have far surpassed Debian for honorable mention. I can't believe the LJ Editors left that distro out of the running!!!
About as fair and balanced as Fox News
The Fox News comment zings a little. ;-)
We select a list of top distros based on reader feedback throughout the year and of course always encourage write-ins.
Mint has indeed been gaining some ground, as has Sabayon and a few others. Lets pose the question to web readers today but split up "favorite distro" in to "favorite distro for your desktop" and "favorite distro for your servers". I think that could also prove interesting.
(We'll post the server question to the site some time next week.)
Thanks for your feedback!
Ok, your entirely too hot to be a Linux Geek.....
You must be a computer generated BOT !!!
So we have the results from the readers for the Linux Journal Readers' Choice Awards for 2009! As usual there is one winner in each category with strong contenders being awarded the Honorable mentions Awards which could go up to here where they would have to get a minimum of 10% vote!! It is a wonderful way of both encouraging the users and the companies to keep on giving their best to their users who will be judging them according to their rapid prototyping performance - each complementing the other!!
Great stuff. Ubuntu + Gnome are doing quite well.
Deleting comments that don't praise ubuntu, I didn't know you were such an ubuntu fanboy.
We only delete comments that are obvious spam comments (typically full of odd-looking links, etc). It is possible that a legitimate comment was accidentally deleted due to some overly aggressive spam cleaning though. If this ever happens, please feel free to re-post. This is definitely not a frequent occurrence.
Katherine Druckman is webmistress at LinuxJournal.com. You might find her on Twitter or at the Southwest Drupal Summit
Nagios is truely a great project and product.
Although Ethan should allow more input from the community and start to think of building a DB backend, so a frontend can be developed away from the program logic, also this would make 3rd party addons to be more streamlined and orchestrated through standard api's.
If you look at how old Nagios is, and what progress it has made(roadmap?), it's not very impressive compared to the other monitoring suites and where they are on this moment.
Don't get me wrong, a fantastic product but let's evolve please!
Hi guys... like this article but I'm pretty sure it's only just May 2009?
I just wanted to inform you that SpiderOak Inc offer a free Linux compatible Online Backup for a multitude of distributions at https://spideroak.com
2GB of storage Free for life, Online Backup, Sync, Storage, Access and Share for cross-platform use (Windows, Mac and Linux) so check us out!
SpiderOak Inc Marketing Manager
Dropbox (https://www.getdropbox.com/referrals/NTU2ODAyNDk) offers the same thing...
See gruchalski.com/2009/04/28/vote-for-flex-builder-for-linux/ and make sure you vote in bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/FB-19053
(odd, stripping the http:// allows this final part to pass the spam filter)
Editors: Fancy doing an actual article on this strange decision ? Maybe you could ask what 'not enough requisition for the product' means - given you can't buy dedicated Linux licenses (only apply Windows or Mac ones) and that the bug is *the most voted* in their bug tracker, in only a week of being open.
Given "Favourite Platform for Developing Rich Internet Apps" is Adobe's Air product, it seems a really poor time to find out Adobe are no longer working on the Linux version of the 'Builder' IDE for Air (and Flex) applications !
James Gray's comment "Finally, this author wishes to express his dismay at the significant number of disparaging remarks in this survey toward green solutions..." disappoints me.
While understandable, given his profession and assuming his legitimate concern for our mutual home, it has no place in a column devoted to reporting poll results. His irrelevant editorializing should have been deleted before publication by another editor. That failure also disappoints me.
Linux Journal provides value to its readers by remaining on-topic, which Mr. Gray did not do. If I care to read about the environment, I can reveal that preference by spending my time and money elsewhere.
Sometimes the delete key serves best.
I am surprised that there was even noticeable response from the not-so-green angle. I had thought that all thinking people had vanished from this planet.
I doubt Linux Mint would have beaten Debian. Mint is a great distro (Ubuntu done right, as I say), but Debian is too entrenched for now.
Yes. Clearly this has been a travesty, an insult to all people of good taste and refinement. In fact, the mere shock of such an affront to my senses has left me in a state of bewilderment. Where am I? Who are you? Why are you such an uptight jackass?
I fear I may never truly know.
I second that, he's an uptight jackass