PAM—Securing Linux Boxes Everywhere
For each service (such as login or SSH), you must define which checks will be done for each group. That list of actions is called a stack. Depending on the results of the actions in each stack, users will succeed or fail, and whatever they attempted to do will be allowed or rejected. You can specify each action in the stack for each service using a specific file at /etc/pam.d (the more current method) or by editing the single, catchall file /etc/pam.conf (the older method); in this article, we use the former method.
Remember that playing with configuration files can be dangerous to your health! A particularly nasty thing to do is remove all configuration files accidentally, because then you won't be able to log back in again. Make sure to back up all files before you start experimenting and have a live CD available just in case.
Each stack is built out of modules, executed sequentially in the given order. For each module, you can specify whether it's necessary (failure automatically denies access), sufficient (success automatically grants access) or optative (allows for alternative checks). Table 2 shows the actual control flags. The file for each service consists of a list of rules, each on its own line. (Longer lines can be split by ending with a \, but this is seldom required.) Lines that start with a hash character (#) are considered to be comments and, thus, are ignored. Each rule contains three fields: the context area (Table 1), the control flag (Table 2) and the module that will be run, along with possible (optional) extra parameters. Thus, the specification for the PAM checks for login would be found in the /etc/pam.d/login file.
The control flag field actually can be more complicated, but I won't cover all the details here. See Resources if you are interested. Also, you can use include, as in auth include common-account, which means to include rules from other files.
There is a special, catchall service called other, that is used for services without specific rules. A good start from a security point of view would be creating /etc/pam.d/other, as shown in Listing 2. All attempts are denied, and a warning is sent to the administrator. If you want to be more forgiving, substitute pam_unix2.so for pam_deny.so, and then the standard Linux authentication method will be used, although a warning will still be sent (Listing 3). If you don't care about security, substitute pam_permit.so instead, which allows entry to everybody, but don't say I didn't warn you.
Finally, give the files in /etc/pam.d a quick once-over. If you find configuration files for applications you don't use, simply rename the files, so PAM will fall back to your “other” configuration. Should you discover later that you really needed the application, change the configuration file back to its original name, and everything will be okay again.
Listing 2. A safe “other” definition forbids all generic access in absence of specific rules. The pam_deny.so module always returns failure, so all access attempts will be rejected, and pam_warn.so sends a warning to the sysadmin.
# # default; deny all accesses # auth required pam_deny.so auth required pam_warn.so account required pam_deny.so password required pam_deny.so password required pam_warn.so session required pam_deny.so
Listing 3. A PAM definition, equivalent to the standard UNIX security rules. Note: on some distributions, you might need to use pam_unix.so instead.
# # standard UNIX minimalistic rules # auth required pam_unix2.so account required pam_unix2.so password required pam_unix2.so session required pam_unix2.so
Listing 4. The /etc/pam.d/sshd specifies security rules for SSH connections. The pam_access.so module was added to the standard configuration to provide further checks.
auth required pam_unix2.so auth required pam_nologin.so account required pam_unix2.so account required pam_access.so session required pam_limits.so session required pam_unix2.so session optional pam_umask.so password requisite pam_pwcheck.so cracklib password required pam_unix2.so use_authtok
|Android Candy: Intercoms||Apr 23, 2015|
|"No Reboot" Kernel Patching - And Why You Should Care||Apr 22, 2015|
|Return of the Mac||Apr 20, 2015|
|DevOps: Better Than the Sum of Its Parts||Apr 20, 2015|
|Play for Me, Jarvis||Apr 16, 2015|
|Drupageddon: SQL Injection, Database Abstraction and Hundreds of Thousands of Web Sites||Apr 15, 2015|
- "No Reboot" Kernel Patching - And Why You Should Care
- Android Candy: Intercoms
- DevOps: Better Than the Sum of Its Parts
- Return of the Mac
- Drupageddon: SQL Injection, Database Abstraction and Hundreds of Thousands of Web Sites
- Designing Foils with XFLR5
- Non-Linux FOSS: .NET?
- Play for Me, Jarvis
- diff -u: What's New in Kernel Development