EOF - Exchanging Exchange
More than five years ago, Linux-friendly IT executives told me (www.linuxjournal.com/article/7414) there was one Microsoft product that was not only highly entrenched but appealing as well: Exchange Server. “We can easily see our way to replacing Microsoft Office and even Microsoft Windows”, one executive told me. “But we can't get along without Exchange. If you're looking for Microsoft's real lock-in with enterprise customers, Exchange is it.”
That was then, but what about now? Recently, I asked readers on the Linux Journal Web site how they'd replace Exchange.
Zimbra came up big:
“Zimbra is open source (though not free software) and has a feature set that is on par with and sometimes even exceeds Exchange. If you are not running an MS-only shop, Zimbra is the best alternative.”
“Zimbra is extremely good, though not light on resources, and it requires a dedicated server to run. It does work flawlessly with free clients like Thunderbird and Evolution while having good support for Outlook. The downside is that it is not completely free (the YPL is open source, but entirely free).”
“Zimbra, hands down. If you're looking for an open-source alternative to Exchange, one of the most important things to look at is the community. The Zimbra community on the forums is awesome, and the Zimbra staff really pay attention to what we as the community say.”
“I also have used Zimbra (free) for my other gigs, and it has worked well, but the packaging of Zimbra is not very desirable.”
“I love Zimbra, as it has a cohesive PIM suite that simply and seamlessly syncs with my mobile devices.”
“We switched to the Zimbra Open Source version, and it is working quite well. There was some initial resistance from users, but that has largely dissipated over a couple months of use.”
“Zimbra (Network Edition, not the free/OSS edition) gives full Outlook integration and probably works just as good as Exchange, functionality-wise. Unfortunately, for my customers (very small business), Zimbra's pricing is not up to par, and compared to Windows SBS pricing, even way too expensive. But, I guess for enterprise environments, it's a very good option.”
“Zimbra is probably the best open-source enterprise e-mail/collaboration product on the market.”
There was some support for Google Apps:
“Google Apps does not have the high degree of client seamlessness that Zimbra has: Web, complete Outlook (PIM, Filters, GAL, etc.), Zimbra Desktop, iPhone/WAP, OTA ActiveSync and so on.”
“We're small (20-person software company), but we dropped Exchange about two years ago in favor of Google Apps. We lost seamless contact and calendar sync on some mobile phones in the office, but we gained a bunch of time from our IT administrator (that was otherwise spent administering Exchange). We gained a great deal of stability and reliability, and we gained all the benefits of Google Mail.”
“Google uses Gmail. Doesn't everybody?”
“...just throw away Exchange and use Google Apps/Docs/Mail, as many businesses do. Google Apps are so much better!”
“Our university, including our medical school and hospital, went with Google, and it has been a big success.”
IBM Lotus Domino/Notes was endorsed for big enterprises, but not without respect for Exchange:
“We've installed IBM Lotus Domino/Notes at a dozen small (10–100 users) businesses. Its versatility is awesome. It's so much more than e-mail. It's rock solid. We run servers on SUSE, Red Hat and Windows. We run clients on Windows, Mac and, yes, Linux! And the pricing is so very affordable.”
“I used to work for a multinational (100,000+ employees) consumer goods company who used Notes/Domino, then was moved to Big Blue who also used Notes/Domino. I now work for a much smaller bank (6,000 employees) that uses Outlook/Exchange. Experience has shown that larger companies with massive user bases tend to use Domino, as it just scales better than Exchange used to. Microsoft has put a lot of effort into making sure Exchange is more robust and that it scales better....Having used both, my preference is for the Notes/Domino combination, as I miss having my workspace.”
Citadel got props:
“...you really want to take a look at Citadel. Although it looks nothing like Exchange, it solves many of the same problems (e-mail, calendars, address books) and some new ones (instant messenger, chat, forums and more), and it does so in a way that is more intuitive. Many who try it soon find that they can't live without it.”
“We use www.citadel.org. It is open source, free, rock solid and well supported. Now we have 50 accounts (but 40GB of indexed mail).”
Scalix (along with some of the others in some cases) got mixed reviews:
“I used Scalix at the last company I worked for and liked it a lot.”
“Scalix is not open source, and the Community version is seriously broken (no CalDAV, etc.).”
“OX/Scalix/Zimbra are bloated and pretend to be open source.”
Others: Kolab, Dovecot, Gordano, Bynari, Postfix+dovecot+chandler-server, Axigen, Communigate, Mailtrust, Novell Groupwise, OpenExchange, Zafara, Sun suites. There was no mention of Scalable OpenGroupware.org, which Francis Lachapelle and Ludovic Marcotte reviewed in April 2008.
So the challenge remains. Any bets on how long it will take to finish the job?
Doc Searls is Senior Editor of Linux Journal. He is also a fellow with the Berkman Center for Internet and Society at Harvard University and the Center for Information Technology and Society at UC Santa Barbara.
Doc Searls is Senior Editor of Linux Journal
Fast/Flexible Linux OS Recovery
On Demand Now
In this live one-hour webinar, learn how to enhance your existing backup strategies for complete disaster recovery preparedness using Storix System Backup Administrator (SBAdmin), a highly flexible full-system recovery solution for UNIX and Linux systems.
Join Linux Journal's Shawn Powers and David Huffman, President/CEO, Storix, Inc.
Free to Linux Journal readers.Register Now!
|Working with Command Arguments||May 28, 2016|
|Secure Desktops with Qubes: Installation||May 28, 2016|
|CentOS 6.8 Released||May 27, 2016|
|Secure Desktops with Qubes: Introduction||May 27, 2016|
|Chris Birchall's Re-Engineering Legacy Software (Manning Publications)||May 26, 2016|
|ServersCheck's Thermal Imaging Camera Sensor||May 25, 2016|
- Tips for Optimizing Linux Memory Usage
- Working with Command Arguments
- Secure Desktops with Qubes: Introduction
- Secure Desktops with Qubes: Installation
- Download "Linux Management with Red Hat Satellite: Measuring Business Impact and ROI"
- CentOS 6.8 Released
- The Italian Army Switches to LibreOffice
- Linux Mint 18
- Oracle vs. Google: Round 2
- The FBI and the Mozilla Foundation Lock Horns over Known Security Hole
Until recently, IBM’s Power Platform was looked upon as being the system that hosted IBM’s flavor of UNIX and proprietary operating system called IBM i. These servers often are found in medium-size businesses running ERP, CRM and financials for on-premise customers. By enabling the Power platform to run the Linux OS, IBM now has positioned Power to be the platform of choice for those already running Linux that are facing scalability issues, especially customers looking at analytics, big data or cloud computing.
￼Running Linux on IBM’s Power hardware offers some obvious benefits, including improved processing speed and memory bandwidth, inherent security, and simpler deployment and management. But if you look beyond the impressive architecture, you’ll also find an open ecosystem that has given rise to a strong, innovative community, as well as an inventory of system and network management applications that really help leverage the benefits offered by running Linux on Power.Get the Guide