Senators Nudge EU On Sun
The acquisition of Sun Microsystems by Oracle has become an ongoing saga, one that is reportedly seeing Sun hemorrhage cash at an alarming rate. The company's troubles have now found their way to the hallowed halls of Congress, where a majority of the U.S. Senate has entered the fray.
The latest development in the Sun soap opera comes as the result of recent actions by European antitrust regulators. The beginning of November brought a "Statement of Objections" from regulators, taking issue with various aspects of the proposed deal. Paramount is the issue of competition in the database market, as Sun acquired MySQL in the not-so-distant past. Many have suggested that the concerns are misplaced, however, given the differences between Oracle and MySQL products, as well as the Open Source nature of MySQL. That the latter has little in the way of European market share has likewise been noted.
Despite having issued it's formal objections, the European Commission continues to investigate the matter, and according to Oracle officials, it's costing Sun some $100 million per month. Given that Sun is a sizable employer, concern has grown that layoffs and possibly worse may be on the horizon, leading US officials to step in. Following the lead of high-profile senators Orrin Hatch and John Kerry, some fifty-nine members of the Untied States Senate — more than half — joined in sending a letter to the European Commission, asking that it complete its investigation ASAP. Citing the threat to American jobs, Senator Kerry told reporters that the senators "felt compelled to ask for a speedy resolution" to the seven-month saga.
The European Commission's investigation falls into a somewhat unique legal arena. Though reports often describe it as "blocking" such acquisitions, it lacks the authority to prevent the deal outright. As both Oracle and Sun are U.S. corporations, they fall under the exclusive purview of the U.S. Department of Justice, and may continue with the takeover regardless of the Commission's decision.
That isn't to suggest that the EC is powerless, however — though it can't block the move, it can bar the companies from doing business within the European Union. Such a move would be extreme to say the least, as it would significantly unbalance competition in the European database market, likely creating a far worse situation than permitting the acquisition would have. In addition, it would leave Oracle and MySQL customers in Europe in the cold, a situation which would no doubt land itself squarely in the laps of European legislators besieged by irate constituents. Ever seeing a situation of that nature is infinitely unlikely, as cooler heads and diplomatic resolution inevitably prevail.
What effect the senator's move may have on the situation is a matter for speculation, though such a dramatic show by more than half of Congress' upper house is unlikely to be lost on European officials. Whether a decision will appear posthaste remains — with great curiosity — to be seen.
Justin Ryan is the News Editor for Linux Journal.
Look for him in the #linuxjournal IRC channel.
Justin Ryan is a Contributing Editor for Linux Journal.
Practical Task Scheduling Deployment
July 20, 2016 12:00 pm CDT
One of the best things about the UNIX environment (aside from being stable and efficient) is the vast array of software tools available to help you do your job. Traditionally, a UNIX tool does only one thing, but does that one thing very well. For example, grep is very easy to use and can search vast amounts of data quickly. The find tool can find a particular file or files based on all kinds of criteria. It's pretty easy to string these tools together to build even more powerful tools, such as a tool that finds all of the .log files in the /home directory and searches each one for a particular entry. This erector-set mentality allows UNIX system administrators to seem to always have the right tool for the job.
Cron traditionally has been considered another such a tool for job scheduling, but is it enough? This webinar considers that very question. The first part builds on a previous Geek Guide, Beyond Cron, and briefly describes how to know when it might be time to consider upgrading your job scheduling infrastructure. The second part presents an actual planning and implementation framework.
Join Linux Journal's Mike Diehl and Pat Cameron of Help Systems.
Free to Linux Journal readers.Register Now!
- Murat Yener and Onur Dundar's Expert Android Studio (Wrox)
- Tech Tip: Really Simple HTTP Server with Python
- SUSE LLC's SUSE Manager
- My +1 Sword of Productivity
- Non-Linux FOSS: Caffeine!
- Managing Linux Using Puppet
- Returning Values from Bash Functions
- Doing for User Space What We Did for Kernel Space
- Rogue Wave Software's Zend Server
- Google's SwiftShader Released
With all the industry talk about the benefits of Linux on Power and all the performance advantages offered by its open architecture, you may be considering a move in that direction. If you are thinking about analytics, big data and cloud computing, you would be right to evaluate Power. The idea of using commodity x86 hardware and replacing it every three years is an outdated cost model. It doesn’t consider the total cost of ownership, and it doesn’t consider the advantage of real processing power, high-availability and multithreading like a demon.
This ebook takes a look at some of the practical applications of the Linux on Power platform and ways you might bring all the performance power of this open architecture to bear for your organization. There are no smoke and mirrors here—just hard, cold, empirical evidence provided by independent sources. I also consider some innovative ways Linux on Power will be used in the future.Get the Guide