Username/Email:  Password: 
TwitterFacebookFlickrRSS

Revision Control: Git or Subversion?

If you had to choose one or the other, which would it be?

Git
49% (373 votes)
Subversion
51% (381 votes)
Total votes: 754

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

the difference?

Anonymous's picture

A nice followup may be a brief illustration of the major differences between the two in terms of functionality. I have always been aware of CVS, then subversion, and more recently git...yet I haven't really been able to determine why someone would choose one over the other. Given the popularity of cvs and svn, I can't help but believe they work just fine, which makes me wonder why git came about (again, my assumption is that it's new).

You're forgetting the most important

Steven Bakker's picture

I fondly remember SCCS. I miss it so much, in fact, that I still prefix my "$Id$" strings with "@(#)".

Seriously.

missing poll options

Anonymous's picture

missing poll options:
Mercurial
Bazaar
Darcs
CVS :-)

Also, as linux users we should be aware a popular choice is not always the best for a person's needs.

Weird question

goblin's picture

If you had to choose one or the other, which would it be?

O Yellow soda pop
O Green soda pop

that one's easy though

Webmistress's picture

definitely yellow. all the way.

Katherine Druckman is webmistress at LinuxJournal.com. You might find her on Twitter or at the Southwest Drupal Summit

Different jobs?

Devin's picture

Depends on how it's going to be used?

Guess I'll refrain from

Anonymous's picture

Guess I'll refrain from voting.

I'm a human, and like my sane-by-default revision numbers, thanks.

Inconclusive

Timmy Macdonald's picture

Considering they're only off by two votes, and only 37 people voted, I feel like the results are pretty inconclusive. This would actually make a great point/counterpoint article.