PS3 Waters Heating Up For Sony

 in

When Sony announced — at the eleventh hour — that it would be disabling the popular "Other OS" feature of its PlayStation 3 console, the reception was anything but positive. Now the outrage has moved from the digital picket line into the courtroom.

The move, which was enforced via a firmware update pushed out on April 1st, gave users two choices: Update and lose their Linux installations, or stay put and lose the ability to use many of the system's other features. Sony's only explanation was that the option presented "security concerns."

As expected, users took their case online, registering their displeasure across the Internet. Equally as expected, Sony remained recalcitrant.

Users appeared to have gained some ground just days later, when a UK-based PS3 owner received a 20% refund — £84 — after citing European consumer protection regulations in a complaint to Amazon UK. Under Directive 1999/44/EC, sellers must warrant that goods are "fit for the purpose which the consumer requires them and which was made known to the seller at the time of purchase."¹²

Sony, however, was nonplussed. The EU directive attaches the warranty obligation to the seller, not the manufacturer, meaning that Amazon is stuck holding the bill. Sony has indicated that it has no intention of reimbursing retailers who issue refunds — it does not appear that any other refunds have been made, however, and Amazon is hardly likely to throw a fit over £84. If claims start to stack up, however, that could change, and Amazon has aptly demonstrated that it isn't adverse to delisting those that displease it.

At the moment, however, Amazon is the least of Sony's worries. As of last week, Sony is now facing three separate federal class action lawsuits in California (where Sony is headquartered), claiming breach of contract, breach of good faith and fair dealing, breach of California's Unfair Competition Law, and violation of California's Consumers Legal Remedies Act.

It will be up to a jury to decide what laws were or weren't broken — if it ever reaches a jury, given that most class action suits are settled before trial — but there would appear to be at least some merit to the claims. It is incontestable that at least some PS3 buyers relied on the "Other OS" feature when they made their purchase. Even if most people never think of them as such, purchases — whether houses, cars, gaming systems, or packs of gum — are contracts, and contracts hinge on mutual promises to deliver. Take away what you promised to deliver (i.e., the "Other OS" the buyer was specifically looking for) and the contract falls apart.

Sony could be in for even more trouble, however. Though there is no indication that anyone has yet to do so, the possibility exists that disaffected consumers in Europe could complain to the European Commission, which has a strong history of investigating unfair and illegal trade practices. The EC has aptly demonstrated its lack of leniency towards offending companies, and shows little concern for a violator's size, industry position, or political influence. Put another way, the Commission does not hesitate to cut any company that pushes European law off at the knees.

U.S.-based consumers could, of course, complain to the Federal Trade Commission, and as is always the case, to Congress, which holds hearings at the drop of a hat. Normally, such complaint would be of little concern, but in the case of the PS3, could be bolstered by the fact that the U.S. military has purchased millions of dollars worth of PS3 systems for use as low-cost supercomputers. It's unlikely that the loss of gaming features is of any concern there, but that no further firmware upgrades — particularly given that the system has finally been successfully hacked — could prove cause for concern.

Being at odds with an army of angry consumers is trouble enough — being at odds with the Army itself is hardly and enviable position.


¹ Our reading of the directive differs from the cited source. The source states: "...where Sony made it known at the time of purchase that you would be able to install an ‘Other OS." Our reading, however, is that the goods must meet the purpose which the buyer conveyed to the seller at the time of purchase — that is, if the buyer says "I want to do ...", the seller must warrant that what they're selling will do that.

² It is also of note that the directive bears an exception "if it can be shown that the seller could not reasonably have known about any defect (or “lack of conformity”) beforehand," i.e., if Amazon couldn't have known Sony would remove the "Other OS" option at the time they sold the PS3.

______________________

Justin Ryan is a Contributing Editor for Linux Journal.

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

"When Sony announced — at the

Josh's picture

"When Sony announced — at the eleventh hour — that it would be disabling the popular "Other OS" feature of its PlayStation 3 console"

I'd say it's more like the thirteenth hour.

Sony, Sony, Sony ....

carlfink's picture

This is the company famous for adding a rootkit to a music CD, remember. At this point, I'd have a hard time buying anything whatsoever from Sony.

(BTW, "averse", not "adverse".)

Sony is garbage and now it's becoming common knowledge

Anonymous's picture

Every piece of Sony equipment I have ever paid for has broken far before it should have, so I honestly would have to think long and hard about buying something from this low quality company.

That being said, all of this debacle has really nailed that decision home far more than I would have considered otherwise. Time and time again they've proven their commitment to giving the consumer less and invading their customers privacy (ie: the famous Sony laptop rootkit). Their recent EULA changes (stating they can remove/change anything they want at any time for any reason) confirms this beyond a doubt.

Anything they ever advertise from here on out should be considered BS because their product probably won't have that feature for very long. They're pushing 3D gaming on the PS3 now, but I suspect that will only last a year at most before they remove it. The same can be said about anything they ever decide to advertise; not just limited to the PS3.

It's important that this issue keep being pushed so that our fellow consumers become aware. We can't let this one companies thought process become the norm.

If they believe they own these devices, then I fully expect to be given the devices for free to use. If I pay even 1 cent for a product, I OWN IT, and I don't care who made it. If they can't manage to give the devices away for free, then let them fail.

Webinar
One Click, Universal Protection: Implementing Centralized Security Policies on Linux Systems

As Linux continues to play an ever increasing role in corporate data centers and institutions, ensuring the integrity and protection of these systems must be a priority. With 60% of the world's websites and an increasing share of organization's mission-critical workloads running on Linux, failing to stop malware and other advanced threats on Linux can increasingly impact an organization's reputation and bottom line.

Learn More

Sponsored by Bit9

Webinar
Linux Backup and Recovery Webinar

Most companies incorporate backup procedures for critical data, which can be restored quickly if a loss occurs. However, fewer companies are prepared for catastrophic system failures, in which they lose all data, the entire operating system, applications, settings, patches and more, reducing their system(s) to “bare metal.” After all, before data can be restored to a system, there must be a system to restore it to.

In this one hour webinar, learn how to enhance your existing backup strategies for better disaster recovery preparedness using Storix System Backup Administrator (SBAdmin), a highly flexible bare-metal recovery solution for UNIX and Linux systems.

Learn More

Sponsored by Storix