a problem of netlink socket


I got a problem about netlink socket.
I want to broadcast a message from kernel to user space.

Here is the kernel code:

struct sock *nl_sk = NULL;
struct sk_buff *skb = NULL;
struct nlmsghdr *nlh;
nl_sk = netlink_kernel_create(NETLINK_UNUSED,
if(nl_sk != NULL) {
if(skb != NULL) {
nlh = (struct nlmsghdr *)skb->data;
nlh->nlmsg_len = NLMSG_SPACE(MAX_PAYLOAD);
nlh->nlmsg_pid = 0;
nlh->nlmsg_flags = 0;
strcpy(NLMSG_DATA(nlh), "Greeting from kernel!\n");
NETLINK_CB(skb).pid = 0;
NETLINK_CB(skb).dst_group = 1;
netlink_broadcast(nl_sk, skb, 0, 1, GFP_ATOMIC);
} else if (skb) {

and here is the user space code:

struct sockaddr_nl src_addr;
struct msghdr msg;
struct nlmsghdr *nlh = NULL;
struct iovec iov;
int sk_nl;
if (sk_nl < 0)
return -1;
memset(&src_addr, 0, sizeof(src_addr));
src_addr.nl_family = AF_NETLINK;
src_addr.nl_pid = getpid();
src_addr.nl_groups = 1;
bind(sk_nl, (struct sockaddr *)&src_addr, sizeof(src_addr));
nlh = (struct nlmsghdr *)malloc(NLMSG_SPACE(MAX_PAYLOAD));
memset(nlh, 0, NLMSG_SPACE(MAX_PAYLOAD));
iov.iov_base = (void *)nlh;
msg.msg_iov = &iov;
msg.msg_iovlen = 1;
while (1) {
recvmsg(sk_nl, &msg, 0);
printf("Received from kernel broadcast: %s\n", NLMSG_DATA(nlh));

I compiled and run, but no messages were received at the user space.
Can anybody help me?

I have the same question. Im

MariaN73's picture

I have the same question. Im so glad that somebody already submitted the answer. Thank you so much!

" Nobody's understand you as much as your motor bicycle "

Help regarding Netlink sockets for 2.6 kernels: Kernel module

P's picture

I'm a netlink newbie developing a kernel module (as stated above) for 2.6.x kernels.
I'm simply truing to pass a(any) message between the user space and the kernel.

The changes to the netlink APIs from kernel to kernel are confusing.
Below is my kernel code:


#define NETLINK_TEST 17
#define VFW_GROUP 0
#define MSG_SIZE NLMSG_SPACE(1024)

static struct sock *nl_sk = NULL;

static void nltest_rcv(struct sock *sk, int len)
struct sk_buff *nl_skb;
struct nlmsghdr *nl_hdr;
int pid;
while ((nl_skb = skb_dequeue(&sk->sk_receive_queue)) != NULL) {
nl_hdr = (struct nlmsghdr *)nl_skb->data;
pid = nl_hdr->nlmsg_pid;
printk(KERN_ALERT "*** Message from user with PID: (pid = %d) is %s\n", pid, (char*)NLMSG_DATA(nl_hdr));
nl_skb = alloc_skb(MSG_SIZE, in_interrupt() ? GFP_ATOMIC : GFP_KERNEL);
skb_put(nl_skb, MSG_SIZE);
nl_hdr = (struct nlmsghdr *)nl_skb->data;
nl_hdr->nlmsg_len = MSG_SIZE;
nl_hdr->nlmsg_pid = pid;
nl_hdr->nlmsg_flags = 0;
strcpy(NLMSG_DATA(nl_hdr), "HELLO HELLO HELLO");
NETLINK_CB(nl_skb).pid = 0;
NETLINK_CB(nl_skb).dst_pid = pid;
NETLINK_CB(nl_skb).dst_group = VFW_GROUP;
netlink_unicast(nl_sk, nl_skb, pid, 0);

/* LXR reference:http://lxr.linux.no/#linux+v2.6.26.7/net/netlink/af_netlink.c#L1358
struct sock * netlink_kernel_create
(struct net *net, int unit, unsigned int groups,void (*input)(struct sk_buff *skb),struct mutex *cb_mutex, struct module *module)

static int __init nltest_init(void)
struct net *net;
printk(KERN_ALERT "INIT/START: nltest\n");
nl_sk = netlink_kernel_create(net,NETLINK_TEST, VFW_GROUP, nltest_rcv, 0, THIS_MODULE);
if (!nl_sk) {
printk(KERN_ALERT "ERROR: nltest - netlink_kernel_create() failed\n");
return -1;
return 0;
static void __exit nltest_exit(void)
printk(KERN_ALERT "EXIT: nltest\n");



when I run a make on this file, it shows the following errors:

root@ubuntu:/home/p# make
make -C /lib/modules/2.6.27-15-generic/build M=/home/p modules
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.27-15-generic'
CC [M] /home/priyanka/kern.o
/home/p/kern.c: In function ‘nltest_rcv’:
/home/p/kern.c:37: error: ‘struct netlink_skb_parms’ has no member named ‘dst_pid’
/home/p/kern.c: In function ‘nltest_init’:
/home/p/kern.c:54: warning: passing argument 4 of ‘netlink_kernel_create’ from incompatible pointer type
make[2]: *** [/home/p/kern.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [_module_/home/p] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.27-15-generic'
make: *** [all] Error 2

The two errors are for
1. netlink_kernel_create function
2. struct netlink_skb_parms

Can anyone help me figure out how to solve these errors?


‘struct netlink_skb_parms’ has no member named ‘dst_pid’

guna's picture

I'm getting ‘struct netlink_skb_parms’ has no member named ‘dst_pid’ error while compiling my netlink code for linux kernel 2.6.27.
can anyone let me know the alternate way to unicast a message from kernel space to user space without using dst_pid.
I hope dst_pid is not supported in linux kernels above 2.6.23. :(

same problem

thierryD's picture


I have the same problem and I didn't succed to fix it.
I use separated functions for init and destroy function, and another function for the kernelcode (creating netlink socket and send msgs).
Do you have any ideas ?


I encountered similar

Anonymous's picture

I encountered similar situation,

I put the kernel code to a separate function. I called this function from function mymodule_init declared with the use of module_init(mymodule_init),

My client( user space ) program stuck with no response from kernel.

The solution was:
1) call netlink_kernel_create from init function
2) call sock_release from destroy function
3) put the remaining code to another function( lets say test_netlink ), call this function when a particular event occurs( for example when somebody reads /proc entry )

It seems that the bind function have to be called after netlink socket had been crated

One Click, Universal Protection: Implementing Centralized Security Policies on Linux Systems

As Linux continues to play an ever increasing role in corporate data centers and institutions, ensuring the integrity and protection of these systems must be a priority. With 60% of the world's websites and an increasing share of organization's mission-critical workloads running on Linux, failing to stop malware and other advanced threats on Linux can increasingly impact an organization's reputation and bottom line.

Learn More

Sponsored by Bit9

Linux Backup and Recovery Webinar

Most companies incorporate backup procedures for critical data, which can be restored quickly if a loss occurs. However, fewer companies are prepared for catastrophic system failures, in which they lose all data, the entire operating system, applications, settings, patches and more, reducing their system(s) to “bare metal.” After all, before data can be restored to a system, there must be a system to restore it to.

In this one hour webinar, learn how to enhance your existing backup strategies for better disaster recovery preparedness using Storix System Backup Administrator (SBAdmin), a highly flexible bare-metal recovery solution for UNIX and Linux systems.

Learn More

Sponsored by Storix