platform_device and driver misunderstanding
I`m doing my embedded project with bf537 (on BF537-STAMP), with kernel 220.127.116.11.
Through digging over several drivers, LDD3 and other stuff, I realized that I`m totally confused.
The issue is that I`m writing network(ethernet) driver, using spi(existing spidev or over) driver. By now I have a driver, that is capable to create ethx interface and fill in information(all of these is fully described in LDD3). But what I can`t find, is the way, how I can use ANOTHER, existing spi driver. Probe() function gets struct platform_device, which(as i know) i fill in a special file, there rosources, devices and other staff is allocated and registerd, etc... So, if i have to get an access to spi(spi resources), i have to declare them, make a master....so to write a nes spi driver. But i want to use existing.
Also, looking at similar driver(bfin_mac) i found something useful, but still it creates MII master, it doesn`t take it from "somewhere in the kernel".
I understand, that what i wrote may be wrong, but that is what I found using a set of drivers from different versions of the kernel.
Could someone explain the mechanism driver ONE may use loaded in the kernel driver TWO?
Thank you very much!!
Webinar: 8 Signs You’re Beyond Cron
11am CDT, April 29th
Join Linux Journal and Pat Cameron, Director of Automation Technology at HelpSystems, as they discuss the eight primary advantages of moving beyond cron job scheduling. In this webinar, you’ll learn about integrating cron with an enterprise scheduler.Join us!
- DevOps: Better Than the Sum of Its Parts
- Return of the Mac
- Drupageddon: SQL Injection, Database Abstraction and Hundreds of Thousands of Web Sites
- Play for Me, Jarvis
- Non-Linux FOSS: .NET?
- Not So Dynamic Updates
- Designing Foils with XFLR5
- Users, Permissions and Multitenant Sites
- April 2015 Issue of Linux Journal: High-Performance Computing