The phishers are getting techincal...
This morning I got a phishing letter. Since it was not from my bank, I almost deleted it without looking, and then this caught my eye:
You are receiving this message, due to you protection, Our Online Technical Security Service Foreign IP Spy recently detected that your online account was recently logged on from am 22.214.171.124 without am International Access Code (I.A.C) and from an unregistered computer, which was not verified by the Our Online Service Department.
Now, besides the bad English, which I will not take time to correct, the IP address jumped out at me and caught my attention and I had two immediate thoughts.
First, my thought was, as a normal Joe User, where is 126.96.36.199 and what does it mean I was logged in from there. That does not look like a street address. As an end user, I do not care what an IP address is (frankly, I do not care that I have one, much less know what it is), so does putting it in a phishing scheme make the email seem more legitimate? I would not think so, but then I have not bothered to study the science too closely.
But what intrigued me more, especially as a network engineer was that the 88 supernet, where ever it might be allocated, cannot possibly be exposing itself to the Internet, can it? And certainly not down to the host level? I cannot think of any major (or minor) corporation or ISP that does not do some form of address translation anymore, so how would I, as an end user, even know I was “logged on” from that IP address even if I was? My IP address is 10.x.x.x or 192.x.x.x or some other non-routable address. I would have no clue what IP address I am ultimately presenting to the outside world, so even if the letter was “legitimate,” giving me the IP address is pointless. Better to say I had logged on from a bistro in France.
But of course, that would defeat the purpose, and the purpose here is to scam you into clicking that little blue hyperlink and typing in your user name and password for the bad guys to get. The Internet never was the domain of fools but it has gotten more dangerous and less safe every day. Caveat emptor and lasciate ogni speranza voi ch'entrate (that’s Dante…)
One Click, Universal Protection: Implementing Centralized Security Policies on Linux Systems
Join editor Bill Childers and Bit9's Paul Riegle on April 27 at 12pm Central to learn how to keep your Linux systems secure.
Free to Linux Journal readers.Register Now!
|diff -u: What's New in Kernel Development||Aug 20, 2014|
|Security Hardening with Ansible||Aug 18, 2014|
|Monitoring Android Traffic with Wireshark||Aug 14, 2014|
|IndieBox: for Gamers Who Miss Boxes!||Aug 13, 2014|
|Non-Linux FOSS: a Virtualized Cisco Infrastructure?||Aug 11, 2014|
|Linux Security Threats on the Rise||Aug 08, 2014|
- diff -u: What's New in Kernel Development
- Security Hardening with Ansible
- NSA: Linux Journal is an "extremist forum" and its readers get flagged for extra surveillance
- Monitoring Android Traffic with Wireshark
- Tech Tip: Really Simple HTTP Server with Python
- [<Megashare>] Watch Mrs Brown's Boys Movie Online Full Movie HD 2014
- RSS Feeds
- Readers' Choice Awards 2013
- Cooking with Linux - Serious Cool, Sysadmin Style!
- Linux Security Threats on the Rise