Packet Sniffing Basics
There is a technique in the security world called session hijacking where an attacker uses a packet sniffer to gain access to a victim's session on a particular Web site by stealing the victim's session cookie for that site. For instance, say I was sniffing traffic on the network, and you logged in to Facebook and left the Remember Me On This Computer check box checked. That signals Facebook to send you a session cookie that your browser stores. I potentially could collect that cookie through packet sniffing, add it to my browser and then have access to your Facebook account. This is such a trivial task that it can be scripted easily (someone even has made a Firefox extension that will do it automatically), and there still aren't many Web sites that encrypt their traffic to the end user, making it a significant problem when using the public Internet.
Figure 3. A Firefox Extension Designed to Gather Unencrypted Session Cookies from the Network
Packet sniffers exist that are specifically designed for monitoring what you are up to on the Internet. They will rebuild the exact Web page you are looking at, photos you're browsing, videos you're watching, and even files you're downloading. These applications are tailored to look through a string of packet captures to find various packet streams and reassemble them on the fly. My roommate in college whipped up something that would display the contents of my browser in real time on his computer (a scary revelation indeed).
E-mail is another one of those things that people tend to get up in arms about because there's an assumption of privacy in e-mail that is derived from the regular mail system. Your e-mail is sent out and viewable, just like anything else that emanates from your computer of the network. E-mail sniffing is what made the FBI's Carnivore program so infamous.
Carnivore was a system implemented by the Federal Bureau of Investigation that was designed to monitor e-mail and electronic communications. It used a customizable packet sniffer that can monitor all of a target user's Internet traffic.
Since every packet bears a destination address in its header, it's possible that someone could sniff the network just to gather a browsing history of everyone on that segment. This may not be very insidious, but it's gathered data, and there's always someone willing to pay for all sorts of data.
I'm sure you're currently seconds from taking a pair of scissors to your network cable and swearing off the Internet for life, but fear not! There are less-drastic measures you can take to prevent such sensitive data loss. None of these precautions is the magic cure for eavesdroppers, but using even one of them will make you a less-desirable target. There's an old joke that says that when you're being chased by a bear, you don't need to outrun the bear, just the guy in front of you. You don't have to have the most secure computer on the block, just more secure than somebody else's. As with most network security, if people really want your data, they can get at it. However, most of the time, attackers aren't targeting a specific person, they're looking for targets of opportunity, so the more secure you are, the less likely you are to be such a target.
The first defense against eavesdropping is the Secure Socket Layer (SSL) used by most Web pages that handle sensitive information. This forces all the content shared back and forth between you and the site to be encrypted. Some sites use SSL for their login pages only. Most sites don't even use SSL at all. It's easy to tell—the URL in the address bar will start with https instead of http. Some sites offer you some choice in the matter. For instance, Google allows you to turn SSL on all the time within Gmail, thus encrypting all your e-mail traffic.
Modern network switches are designed to pass data intelligently to avoid packet collisions and excessive network traffic. If a packet is broadcast that is not intended for one of the nodes attached to it, the router will not rebroadcast to the local nodes. Likewise, if a packet is broadcast locally that is intended for another local node, the switch will not rebroadcast to the outside network. This forces strict segmentation on a network. For us, this means that someone using a packet sniffer on a switched network will not see any traffic from hosts not attached to the same switch. This doesn't mean much on small-scale networks, like you have at your house, but on a larger scale, it means that somebody can't sit in the breakroom sniffing traffic three floors up from the accounting department.
Wireless network encryption has come a long way in its short lifespan—going from no encryption to Wired Equivalent Privacy (WEP) encryption to Wi-Fi Protected Access (WPA) encryption. Wireless networks don't provide the same segmentation that the previously mentioned switches provide, meaning that any packet transmitted on a wireless access point gets rebroadcast to everyone else on the access point. Even though your traffic is encrypted under WEP, this encryption protects only the data from users not connected to that wireless network. The encryption scheme and key are identical for all users, so all your "encrypted" data is decryptable by anyone on the network, making your data essentially unencrypted. WPA solves this issue by isolating all users on the network and giving them a different encryption scheme even when the key is the same.
If you have SSH access to a computer outside your current network (which I'm sure most of us do), you can tunnel all your traffic through an SSH connection. You essentially are using the encryption of the SSH connection to protect all your data from eavesdroppers. There are two apparent downsides to this technique. First, you're connection speed will drop, because now instead of going from you to the destination and back, your traffic will go from you to the SSH server to the destination and back. Second, your data is transmitted unencrypted from the remote end, so if that machine is vulnerable to packet sniffing, your data is no safer than it was at your local machine.
Virtual private networks are intended to allow users access to a network that otherwise would be inaccessible. However, they also can be used to protect your traffic, because VPN connections are encrypted. You can set up a private VPN for yourself just for this purpose, but it will have the same disadvantages as SSH tunneling. If you work for a company that has a VPN, you may be allowed to use it for this purpose, but your traffic will fall under the same policy and rules that you have in your office, so be careful what you use it for.
|Dynamic DNS—an Object Lesson in Problem Solving||May 21, 2013|
|Using Salt Stack and Vagrant for Drupal Development||May 20, 2013|
|Making Linux and Android Get Along (It's Not as Hard as It Sounds)||May 16, 2013|
|Drupal Is a Framework: Why Everyone Needs to Understand This||May 15, 2013|
|Home, My Backup Data Center||May 13, 2013|
|Non-Linux FOSS: Seashore||May 10, 2013|
- Dynamic DNS—an Object Lesson in Problem Solving
- Making Linux and Android Get Along (It's Not as Hard as It Sounds)
- Using Salt Stack and Vagrant for Drupal Development
- New Products
- A Topic for Discussion - Open Source Feature-Richness?
- Drupal Is a Framework: Why Everyone Needs to Understand This
- Validate an E-Mail Address with PHP, the Right Way
- RSS Feeds
- Readers' Choice Awards
- Tech Tip: Really Simple HTTP Server with Python
- BASH script to log IPs on public web server
53 min 52 sec ago
4 hours 29 min ago
- Reply to comment | Linux Journal
5 hours 2 min ago
- All the articles you talked
7 hours 25 min ago
- All the articles you talked
7 hours 28 min ago
- All the articles you talked
7 hours 30 min ago
11 hours 54 min ago
- Keeping track of IP address
13 hours 45 min ago
- Roll your own dynamic dns
18 hours 59 min ago
- Please correct the URL for Salt Stack's web site
22 hours 10 min ago
Free Webinar: Hadoop
How to Build an Optimal Hadoop Cluster to Store and Maintain Unlimited Amounts of Data Using Microservers
Realizing the promise of Apache® Hadoop® requires the effective deployment of compute, memory, storage and networking to achieve optimal results. With its flexibility and multitude of options, it is easy to over or under provision the server infrastructure, resulting in poor performance and high TCO. Join us for an in depth, technical discussion with industry experts from leading Hadoop and server companies who will provide insights into the key considerations for designing and deploying an optimal Hadoop cluster.
Some of key questions to be discussed are:
- What is the “typical” Hadoop cluster and what should be installed on the different machine types?
- Why should you consider the typical workload patterns when making your hardware decisions?
- Are all microservers created equal for Hadoop deployments?
- How do I plan for expansion if I require more compute, memory, storage or networking?