Loading
Home ›
Look Who Gave Money to Apache
- This discussion is closed: you can't post new comments.
- This discussion is closed: you can't post new comments.
- This discussion is closed: you can't post new comments.
- This discussion is closed: you can't post new comments.
- This discussion is closed: you can't post new comments.
- This discussion is closed: you can't post new comments.
Aug 01, 2008 By Phil Hughes
ASF seems to have a new member to the tune of at least $100,000/year. Who? None other than Microsoft. The information is in Sam Ramji's blog. Who? "Sam Ramji is the Senior Director of Platform Strategy leading Microsoft’s platform strategy efforts across the company, including long-term strategic planning in the Windows Server and Tools organization.
Now, do we believe this?
It is not a move away from IIS as Microsoft’s strategic web server technology. We have invested significantly in refactoring and adding new, state-of-the-art features to IIS, including support for PHP. We will continue to invest in IIS for the long term and are currently under way with development of IIS 8.
______________________
Phil Hughes
Trending Topics
| You Need A Budget | Feb 10, 2012 |
| The Linux powered LAN Gaming House | Feb 08, 2012 |
| Creating a vDSO: the Colonel's Other Chicken | Feb 06, 2012 |
| Your CMS Is Not Your Web Site | Feb 01, 2012 |
| Casper, the Friendly (and Persistent) Ghost | Jan 31, 2012 |
| Razor-qt 0.4 - Qt based Desktop Environment | Jan 30, 2012 |
- Fun with ethtool
- Parallel Programming with NVIDIA CUDA
- Readers' Choice Awards 2011
- 100% disappointed with the decision to go all digital.
- Linux-Based X Terminals with XDMCP
- Validate an E-Mail Address with PHP, the Right Way
- You Need A Budget
- The Linux powered LAN Gaming House
- Why Python?
- Python for Android
- Employment Posters
5 hours 1 min ago - Sure the best distro is
6 hours 21 min ago - BeOS was the best
9 hours 5 min ago - I use Wireshark on a daily
13 hours 35 min ago - buena información
18 hours 42 min ago - One important "bucket" that I didn't note (désolé si qqun deja d
19 hours 43 min ago - Gnome3 is such a POS. No one
1 day 5 hours ago - Gnome 3 is the biggest POS
1 day 5 hours ago - I didn't knew this thing by
1 day 11 hours ago - Author's reply
1 day 14 hours ago





Comments
Extension of the Apache POI support
The Apache support from Microsoft can be seen as an extension of the support MS gave to the Apache POI project.
I came across this theory about the reasons for Microsofts support of a competitor like Apache:
http://fussnotes.typepad.com/plexnex/2008/03/interpreting-mi.html
"The key is that going forward, they won't have to document or define eXtensions that connect MSOffice information to MS Server Stack business processes. With ISO approval, MSOffice becomes a standards compliant "editor" for the MS Cloud and ecosystem of web application - web services developers. Expanding this ecosystem to capture the Apache developer community, so that they too are bound into the MSOffice editor - MS Server Stack, is probably the fruit of their surprising support for Apache POI."
Flying pigs ... Frozen hell ... Money from MS??
I think Microsoft invest in organizations/companies that are important to them. If memory serves, they invested in ActiveState a few years back to "port" Perl to the Windows Server platforms, which wasn't such a bad thing, really. Also, remember that there's a lot more going on at ASF than the upkeep of the Apache Web Server. Still ... it is very interesting ...
Paul Barry
I'm not too concerned about this
While I've always supported Linux over MS in my time with technology, I'm pragmatic in my support.
Yes, IIS is crap. Yes, in the past these moves have been grounds for speculation as to the motives. However, in the past five years, FOSS has gained enough momentum on the Enterprise level to make make MS realize that changes need to be made on their end. These changes are not going to be sweeping and immediate (especially while Balder...er...Ballmer) is still on board but they are going to change. This is a work of evolution, not creation-ism.
-Mathew