Linux Distro: Tails - You Can Never Be Too Paranoid

Tails is a live media Linux distro designed boot into a highly secure desktop environment. You may remember that we looked at a US government distro with similar aims a few months ago, but Tails is different because it is aimed at the privacy conscious “normal user” rather than government workers.

Tails takes the form of a bootable live image that can be used from a CD ROM, a USB stick or via a network boot. Once booted, it executes from RAM, taking care not to make use of a swap partition. The desktop is Gnome 2.0 and the applications are a fairly standard selection. The web browser is an old, but usable, version of Iceweasel 3.5 (Debian Firefox). There are other applications to handle graphics work, audio editing, media playback, text editing, instant messaging and a email client - basically, everything you need when you’re on the run from enemy agents. Extra software can be added via the Synaptic package manager which pulls directly from the Debian repositories. So far, so similar to most other live desktop distros. Security and limited footprint on the the host machine are the areas in which the distro differs from the run of the mill.

All interactions with the Internet are passed through Tor an anonymization system. Using Tor, Tails pipes all Internet traffic emanating from your computer through a constantly shifting set of relays that are operated by a network of volunteers. Consequently, it’s then difficult for anyone to monitor your activity on the web or for web hosts to pinpoint your location. In short, your web activities are anonymous. It’s hardly an exhaustive test, but sure enough, when I visited Google News, it presumed that was located in a different country after each reboot.

The desktop itself is pretty standard fare.

The supplied version of Iceweasel comes with an extension to enable end to end encryption (HTTPS) whenever possible in order to further increase security and another one to switch Tor on and off. Many of the applications that are supplied have been tweaked in this way, to improve security. Tails also wipes the contents of RAM on shutdown, and it has a little onscreen keyboard to bypass hardware key loggers. Note that it isn't loaded down with security tools, such as those for penetration testing, although such tools can be added via the package manager. The aim of the distribution is clearly to provide a secure client and tools rather than to provide a ready-made platform for hacking.

There’s nothing to stop you using Tor to give you a secure general purpose desktop whenever you are forced to use a machine that you are not 100% sure about, security wise. Handy, if you want to check financial or other sensitive information. Beyond that, it comes into its own for denizens of oppressive regimes in which governments actively monitor Internet use and persecute free expression.

From the walkthough document:

So, what should you do when you hear them knocking? You should calmly make a clean shut-down [...] Then you wait, possibly trying to buy valuable time by barricading your door.

Scary stuff!

The Tails website.


UK based freelance writer Michael Reed writes about technology, retro computing, geek culture and gender politics.


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Thank you

JShuford's picture

Thank you

...I'm not just a "troll", but also a subscriber!

Liberte Linux

Anonymous's picture

Another good project is Liberte Linux. Does the same thing as Tails, but I prefer Liberte most.

Image options

crb3's picture

@Michael, re x33a:

I suggest making the thumbnail a link to the fullsize image, with a "click to view image at 1:1" title field (a 'tooltip' that pops up on a mouseover). That way you've got your layout intact, but reading all the text in the image is one (double)click away. IMO that should be standard policy.

@ Micheal, I always wonder

x33a's picture

@ Micheal, I always wonder why don't you guys ever post full images. If you need to demonstrate the GUI of an OS or a program, then the screenshot should be clear enough. (In this article, it's still reasonably clear, but sometimes, the image quality/size is very bad).

This is the biggest gripe I have with LJ. If you have bandwidth problems, then you should use 3rd party image hosts.

I'll pass that remark onto

Michael Reed's picture

I'll pass that remark onto the team. What res are you browsing at, BTW?

In this case, I omitted the detail as an overview was sufficient to convey the point that I was making - that it's a fairly standard looking Gnome 2.0 desktop. Thanks for commenting.

UK based freelance writer Michael Reed writes about technology, retro computing, geek culture and gender politics.


x33a's picture

I have 1024 X 768 resolution.

It'll be even better if you post smaller images, or thumbnails in the article, but link them to a bigger and better quality image.



David Riley's picture

I agree with this. In this article it was okay as there was a decent sized image in the article, but a lot of articles only have a small thumbnail image at the start of the first paragraph. I often times click on this hoping to see a full size image so I can see certain details, and I am always disappointed when I find there is no such image. Linking the thumbnail to the full size screen capture would be perfect and very helpful.


San Bergmans's picture

Small correction of the title. It's not TALES, it's TAILS. Sounds the same, different thing.

I wrote a small story about tails on my own site, in Dutch.

Thanks for spotting that one.

Michael Reed's picture

Thanks for spotting that one. Sorry about that, guys. I've corrected it now. Shudder - that one was pretty embarrassing.

UK based freelance writer Michael Reed writes about technology, retro computing, geek culture and gender politics.