Linux Advanced Routing Tutorial
National vs. International Traffic
Google's public DNS server B is clearly an off-shore international destination. However, one of the root DNS servers, namely f.root-servers.net with IP 220.127.116.11, is present here in New Zealand. At the moment, the traceroute to f.root-servers.net still shows the ADSL path:
[workstation] ~ $ /usr/sbin/traceroute f.root-servers.net traceroute to f.root-servers.net (18.104.22.168), 30 hops max, ↪40 byte packets using UDP 1 gw-vlan-office.e-it.co.nz (192.168.130.1) ↪0.175 ms 0.126 ms 0.125 ms 2 gw-vlan-adsl.e-it.co.nz (192.168.128.254) ↪0.861 ms 0.840 ms 0.825 ms 3 core-adsl.isp2 (218.101.x.y) 22.456 ms 22.298 ms 23.501 ms 4 isp2.ape.net.nz (192.203.154.x) 21.035 ms 20.928 ms 21.268 ms 5 isc2.ape.net.nz (192.203.154.y) 20.689 ms 21.724 ms 24.187 ms 6 f.root-servers.net (22.214.171.124) 26.680 ms 26.059 ms 25.427 ms
This is clearly national traffic, and it should go out via the SHDSL link as per our plan. We can do that manually and set the appropriate route on our core router:
[router] ~ # ip route add 126.96.36.199 via 203.0.113.37 ↪dev vlan-shdsl
A side note about NAT'ing: we also need to translate (or "masquerade" or NAT) the office address range 192.168.130.0/24 to our SHDSL public IP 203.0.113.38. If we didn't, the packet's source IP would be 192.168.130.100, and the replies would never find their way back to my workstation, as this address range is not routable in the public Internet. Discussing firewalls and NATs is out of scope of this article, but to get you going, here's the simplest magic command:
[router] ~ # iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.128.0/20 ↪-o vlan-shdsl -j DNAT --to 203.0.113.38
All packets with a source address from the 192.168.128.0/20 range leaving through the interface vlan-shdsl will get the source rewritten to 203.0.113.38. We didn't need to set up any masquerading for the ADSL path, because there the ADSL router NATs all our outgoing traffic.
Now, let's check the new network path:
[workstation] ~ $ /usr/sbin/traceroute f.root-servers.net traceroute to f.root-servers.net (188.8.131.52), 30 hops max, ↪40 byte packets using UDP 1 gw-vlan-office.e-it.co.nz (192.168.130.1) ↪0.190 ms 0.129 ms 0.125 ms 2 rt-shdsl.isp1 (203.0.113.37) 2.676 ms 2.599 ms 2.632 ms 3 rt3.isp1 (121.98.ab.cd) 2.715 ms 2.680 ms 2.591 ms 4 isc2.ape.net.nz (192.203.154.z) 2.919 ms 3.033 ms 3.088 ms 5 f.root-servers.net (184.108.40.206) 3.007 ms 2.670 ms 2.864 ms
That's lot better. The first hop remains the same, that's my workstation's router, but the second hop is no longer the ADSL modem. Instead, it's the SHDSL ISP1's core router. It also clearly shows the latency improvement—from 26ms over ADSL to 3ms over SHDSL.
Let's remove the manual route again to avoid any confusion down the road and query the routing table:
[router] ~ # ip route get 220.127.116.11 from ↪192.168.130.100 iif vlan-office 18.104.22.168 from 192.168.130.100 via 203.0.113.37 ↪dev vlan-shdsl # SHDSL [router] ~ # ip route delete 22.214.171.124 via 203.0.113.37 ↪dev vlan-shdsl [router] ~ # ip route get 126.96.36.199 from ↪192.168.130.100 iif vlan-office 188.8.131.52 from 192.168.130.100 via 192.168.128.254 ↪dev vlan-adsl # ADSL
So all we need now is a list of all national IP addresses, put them in the routing table, and we're done. But how? Manually? Even in a small country like New Zealand there are hundreds of local IP addresses and prefixes, and the list is dynamic and changes daily. There is no way such a list could be managed manually. We need a better tool.
Michal Ludvig works for Enterprise IT Ltd in New Zealand as a senior Linux engineer. He's got root access to some of the largest New Zealand corporations, but since he tends to forget his passwords, he is, in general, pretty harmless.
|Nativ Disc||Sep 23, 2016|
|Android Browser Security--What You Haven't Been Told||Sep 22, 2016|
|The Many Paths to a Solution||Sep 21, 2016|
|Synopsys' Coverity||Sep 20, 2016|
|Naztech's Roadstar 5 Car Charger||Sep 16, 2016|
|RPi-Powered pi-topCEED Makes the Case as a Low-Cost Modular Learning Desktop||Sep 15, 2016|
- Readers' Choice Awards 2013
- Android Browser Security--What You Haven't Been Told
- The Many Paths to a Solution
- Download "Linux Management with Red Hat Satellite: Measuring Business Impact and ROI"
- Nativ Disc
- Synopsys' Coverity
- Naztech's Roadstar 5 Car Charger
- Securing the Programmer
- RPi-Powered pi-topCEED Makes the Case as a Low-Cost Modular Learning Desktop
- CodeLathe FileCloud Google Chrome Extension
With all the industry talk about the benefits of Linux on Power and all the performance advantages offered by its open architecture, you may be considering a move in that direction. If you are thinking about analytics, big data and cloud computing, you would be right to evaluate Power. The idea of using commodity x86 hardware and replacing it every three years is an outdated cost model. It doesn’t consider the total cost of ownership, and it doesn’t consider the advantage of real processing power, high-availability and multithreading like a demon.
This ebook takes a look at some of the practical applications of the Linux on Power platform and ways you might bring all the performance power of this open architecture to bear for your organization. There are no smoke and mirrors here—just hard, cold, empirical evidence provided by independent sources. I also consider some innovative ways Linux on Power will be used in the future.Get the Guide