LDAP: Attributes and Keeping Them Simple
A consensus exists among many writers about jargon. Throw a bunch of undefined words at a reader and he or she will soon fall asleep. In fact, put one term in a paragraph that the reader doesn't understand and a page or two later sleep will start to creep and the reader will lose interest.
So, in spite of the what many technical writers practice, I thought I might give you a break. You don't need to know everything about LDAP directory components or the construction of an address book to begin understanding the technology behind directories.
To a person who wants to find the name and email address of someone, he or she wants to do a simple search to find it. Does that person need to know how the information got into the directory? Do they need to understand how the directory came into being? Think about that.
In Gerald Carter's book, "LDAP Administration", he addresses attributes in a way I find intimidating. Here's a little quote for you:
Attributes types and the associated syntax rules are similar to variables and data type declarations found in many programming languages. The comparison is not that big a stretch.
OK then. How about another way of discussing it. Attributes hold information you need in a directory. For example, they might contain someone's name, address, telephone numbers, employee numbers, the department in which he or she work, his or her job title, etc.
Many other attributes exist in directories and LDAP administrators organize those attributes using something we will discuss in the next installment.
So, get ready for the next bit of jargon called objectClasses. You should find that subject pretty interesting if I can manage to write about it without putting you into an altered state.
Today’s modular x86 servers are compute-centric, designed as a least common denominator to support a wide range of IT workloads. Those generic, virtualized IT workloads have much different resource optimization requirements than hyperscale and cloud applications. They have resulted in a “one size fits all” enterprise IT architecture that is not optimized for a specific set of IT workloads, and especially not emerging hyperscale workloads, such as web applications, big data, and object storage. In this report, you will learn how shifting the focus from traditional compute-centric IT architectures to an innovative disaggregated fabric-based architecture can optimize and scale your data center.
Sponsored by AMD
Built-in forensics, incident response, and security with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Every security policy provides guidance and requirements for ensuring adequate protection of information and data, as well as high-level technical and administrative security requirements for a system in a given environment. Traditionally, providing security for a system focuses on the confidentiality of the information on it. However, protecting the data integrity and system and data availability is just as important. For example, when processing United States intelligence information, there are three attributes that require protection: confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
Learn more about catching the bad guy in this free white paper.
Sponsored by DLT Solutions
| Making Linux and Android Get Along (It's Not as Hard as It Sounds) | May 16, 2013 |
| Drupal Is a Framework: Why Everyone Needs to Understand This | May 15, 2013 |
| Home, My Backup Data Center | May 13, 2013 |
| Non-Linux FOSS: Seashore | May 10, 2013 |
| Trying to Tame the Tablet | May 08, 2013 |
| Dart: a New Web Programming Experience | May 07, 2013 |
- RSS Feeds
- New Products
- Making Linux and Android Get Along (It's Not as Hard as It Sounds)
- Drupal Is a Framework: Why Everyone Needs to Understand This
- A Topic for Discussion - Open Source Feature-Richness?
- Home, My Backup Data Center
- Readers' Choice Awards
- What's the tweeting protocol?
- Developer Poll
- New Products
- Reply to comment | Linux Journal
2 hours 52 min ago - play with linux? i think you mean work-around linux
11 hours 18 min ago - Where is Epistle?
11 hours 24 min ago - You forgot OwnCloud
11 hours 53 min ago - aplikasi free
15 hours 8 min ago - Having a framework
15 hours 11 min ago - Fix my computer
15 hours 52 min ago - go-mtpfs
19 hours 58 min ago - Missed one
20 hours 18 min ago - web Host
20 hours 26 min ago
Enter to Win an Adafruit Prototyping Pi Plate Kit for Raspberry Pi

It's Raspberry Pi month at Linux Journal. Each week in May, Adafruit will be giving away a Pi-related prize to a lucky, randomly drawn LJ reader. Winners will be announced weekly.
Fill out the fields below to enter to win this week's prize-- a Prototyping Pi Plate Kit for Raspberry Pi.
Congratulations to our winners so far:
- 5-8-13, Pi Starter Pack: Jack Davis
- 5-15-13, Pi Model B 512MB RAM: Patrick Dunn
- Next winner announced on 5-21-13!
Free Webinar: Linux Backup and Recovery
Most companies incorporate backup procedures for critical data, which can be restored quickly if a loss occurs. However, fewer companies are prepared for catastrophic system failures, in which they lose all data, the entire operating system, applications, settings, patches and more, reducing their system(s) to “bare metal.” After all, before data can be restored to a system, there must be a system to restore it to.
In this one hour webinar, learn how to enhance your existing backup strategies for better disaster recovery preparedness using Storix System Backup Administrator (SBAdmin), a highly flexible bare-metal recovery solution for UNIX and Linux systems.



Comments
Using jargon
Using jargon is not bad. The point is to explain the words in glossary. Of course the glossary must be published.
Keeping Them Simple
Nicely put, interesting post.
Regards
thx
thanks
Couldn't have said it better
You hit the nail on the head with this one. I always find myself disinterested in articles I read when I can't understand what the heck its talking about. Especially technical stuff. To be honest even some of your stuff. It just makes me feel dumb. Thats a compliment by the way :0
simple is better
Totally agree with you Tom, you nailed it
thank's
Maldee
LDAP
Great,i think so to
Re
Well thank you, i must agree..