Hack and / - Password Cracking with GPUs, Part II: Get Cracking

Dictionary Attacks

The first attack you should try is a dictionary attack. With a dictionary attack, you provide the cracking software with a dictionary full of possible passwords to try, such as all the words in the English dictionary. The cracking software then tries each dictionary word until one matches your hash. Since the number of combinations in a dictionary attack is much smaller than with a brute-force attack, dictionary attacks complete much faster. As an example, when I was first researching this article, I let a brute-force attack run for days against a sample set of hashes without cracking one of them. I was able to crack three out of the five hashes with a dictionary attack in less than a minute.

To run a dictionary attack with oclHashcat-plus, first run the command with the --help argument. That will provide you with the number that corresponds to the hash algorithm you want to crack. In the case of phpass, that number is 400. Then, run the command a second time and specify the password hash to use with the -m option, the file in which to store the recovered passwords with the -o option, and then list the file that contains your hashes and the file or files you want to use as a dictionary. Here's an example dictionary attack against phpass hashes:


/path/to/oclHashcat-plus32.bin -m 400 -o recovered_hashes 
 ↪example400.hash example.dict

If I had multiple dictionaries, I could list all of them on the command line or even use a shell glob. A dictionary attack is only as good as its dictionaries, but a number of good password dictionaries are available on the Web that you can find with a quick search for "password cracking wordlist".

Calculating Cracking Speed

Before I discuss brute-force attacks in detail, it's important to learn how to estimate how long a particular brute-force attack will take. With a brute attack, you aren't just going through a dictionary of words, you are actually trying all possible combinations of a set of characters. In researching the article, I wasted days attempting a brute-force attack against an eight-character password before I finally did the math and realized it was completely impractical.

The first step is to figure out how fast your hardware can crack a particular type of hash. As you will discover, the number of comparisons per second your hardware can perform will vary widely depending on the hash type, so start a sample brute-force attack just long enough to get a bit of progress output, and then press Ctrl-c to exit. In my case, because I'm using oclHashcat-plus, I needed to download and extract the maskprocessor software from hashcat.net, so it, combined with oclHashcat-plus, could perform a brute-force attack against phpass (don't worry about the command syntax for now, I discuss the specifics later):


/path/to/mp32.bin -1 ?d?l?u ?1?1?1?1?1?1 | \
/path/to/oclHashcat-plus32.bin -m 400 \
-o recovered_hashes phpass-hashes

oclHashcat-plus v0.06 by atom starting...

Hashes: 6
Unique salts: 6
Unique digests: 6
Bitmaps: 8 bits, 256 entries, 0x000000ff mask, 1024 bytes
Rules: 1
GPU-Loops: 128
GPU-Accel: 16
Password lengths range: 1 - 15
Platform: AMD compatible platform found 
Watchdog: Temperature limit set to 90c  
Device #1: Cayman, 2048MB, 0Mhz, 22MCU  
Device #1: Allocating 264MB host-memory 
Device #1: Kernel ./kernels/4098/m0400.Cayman.32.kernel (274238 bytes)

Starting attack in wordlist stdin mode...

Status.......: Running
Input.Mode...: Piped
Hash.Type....: phpass, MD5(Wordpress), MD5(phpBB3)
Time.Running.: 10 secs
Time.Util....: 10001.4ms/180.8ms Real/CPU, 1.8% idle
Speed........:   315.3k c/s Real,   351.4k c/s GPU
Recovered....: 0/6 Digests, 0/6 Salts   
Progress.....: 3153920
Rejected.....: 0
HW.Monitor.#1: 96% GPU, 54c Temp

The output line to pay attention to is the line that begins with Speed. As you can see from that output, my GPU can do around 350,000 comparisons per second, so I'll use that number for the rest of my calculations.

One good site I've found for doing cracking estimates is http://www.lockdown.co.uk/?pg=combi. This site describes all sorts of different character sets and password lengths, and it describes how long anything from a single Pentium CPU to a mythical government supercomputer might take to brute-force all combinations. Otherwise, the math is pretty straightforward. Just take the number of characters in your character set (for instance, all lowercase letters would equal 26), then figure out how long of a password you want to brute-force, then raise the first number to the power of the second.

So, for instance, all mixed-case alphanumeric characters (A–Za–z0–9) equals 62 characters. If I wanted to brute force a six-character password, that would be 626 = 57 billion combinations.

If you divide 57 billion combinations by a system that can do 350,000 comparisons a second, you get approximately 45 hours to complete the brute-force attack. That's not bad, but let's do the same math for eight-character passwords: 628 = 218 trillion combinations.

At 350,000 comparisons per second, it would take me approximately 7,200 days, or 19 years, to complete the attack. On the plus side, for another $250, I could complete the attack in less than 10 years! If you add symbols to your brute-force attack, the number jumps to 7.2 quadrillion combinations, or around 652 years.

Brute-Force Attacks

Once you've figured out whether a brute-force attack will complete in your lifetime, the next step is to run maskprocessor and tell it what kind of word list to generate. The maskprocessor command supports a number of common character sets by default with the following symbols:

  • ?d = all decimals (0–9).

  • ?l = lowercase characters (a–z).

  • ?u = uppercase characters (A–Z).

  • ?s = symbols.

You also can define a custom character set with -1 (or -2, -3) and then use ?1 to use that custom set. For instance, if I wanted to enumerate through all three-character passwords made up of lowercase characters and numbers, I could type:


/path/to/mp32.bin -1 ?d?l ?1?1?1
000
001
. . .
zzy
zzz

In my example brute-force attack, I wanted to run through all combinations of uppercase, lowercase and numbers in a six-character password. The resulting maskprocessor command would be:


/path/to/mp32.bin -1 ?d?l?u ?1?1?1?1?1?1

Then, I would pipe the output of that command to oclHashcat-plus:


/path/to/mp32.bin -1 ?d?l?u ?1?1?1?1?1?1 | \
/path/to/oclHashcat-plus32.bin -m 400 \
-o recovered_hashes phpass-hashes

As with my dictionary attack, the -m option specifies I want to crack phpass hashes, the -o lists the file in which I want to store my recovered hashes, and finally, I specify the file that contains the phpass hashes to crack. On my hardware, it took around two days to run fully through the above brute-force attack.

Now you should be ready to get cracking, but as you'll find, the world of password cracking can get pretty dense, pretty quickly. In my next and final part of the series, I will discuss how you can tune the above attacks to get better performance, and also how to blend both dictionary and brute-force attacks to get the best of both worlds.

Resources

Hashcat: http://hashcat.net

Password Recovery Speeds: http://www.lockdown.co.uk/?pg=combi

Password photo via Shutterstock.com

______________________

Kyle Rankin is a systems architect; and the author of DevOps Troubleshooting, The Official Ubuntu Server Book, Knoppix Hacks, Knoppix Pocket Reference, Linux Multimedia Hacks, and Ubuntu Hacks.

White Paper
Linux Management with Red Hat Satellite: Measuring Business Impact and ROI

Linux has become a key foundation for supporting today's rapidly growing IT environments. Linux is being used to deploy business applications and databases, trading on its reputation as a low-cost operating environment. For many IT organizations, Linux is a mainstay for deploying Web servers and has evolved from handling basic file, print, and utility workloads to running mission-critical applications and databases, physically, virtually, and in the cloud. As Linux grows in importance in terms of value to the business, managing Linux environments to high standards of service quality — availability, security, and performance — becomes an essential requirement for business success.

Learn More

Sponsored by Red Hat

White Paper
Private PaaS for the Agile Enterprise

If you already use virtualized infrastructure, you are well on your way to leveraging the power of the cloud. Virtualization offers the promise of limitless resources, but how do you manage that scalability when your DevOps team doesn’t scale? In today’s hypercompetitive markets, fast results can make a difference between leading the pack vs. obsolescence. Organizations need more benefits from cloud computing than just raw resources. They need agility, flexibility, convenience, ROI, and control.

Stackato private Platform-as-a-Service technology from ActiveState extends your private cloud infrastructure by creating a private PaaS to provide on-demand availability, flexibility, control, and ultimately, faster time-to-market for your enterprise.

Learn More

Sponsored by ActiveState