Git - Revision Control Perfected
A remote named "origin" is configured automatically when a repository
is created using git clone. Consider a clone of Linus Torvald's Kernel
Tree mirrored on GitHub:
git clone https://github.com/mirrors/linux-2.6.git
If you look inside the new repository's config file (.git/config), you'll see these lines set up:
[remote "origin"]
fetch = +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/*
url = https://github.com/mirrors/linux-2.6.git
[branch "master"]
remote = origin
merge = refs/heads/master
The fetch line above defines the remote tracking branches. This "refspec" specifies that all branches in the remote repository under "refs/heads" (the default path for branches) should be transferred to the local repository under "refs/remotes/origin". For example, the remote branch named "master" will become a tracking branch named "origin/master" in the local repository.
The lines under the branch section provide defaults—specific to the
master branch in this example—so that git pull can be called with
no arguments to fetch and merge from the remote master branch into the
local master branch.
The git pull command is actually a combination of the
git fetch and
git merge commands. If you do a git
fetch instead, the tracking branches
will be updated and you can compare them to see what changed. Then you
can merge as a separate step:
git merge origin/master
Git also provides the git push command for uploading to a remote
repository. The push operation is essentially the inverse of the pull
operation, but since it won't do a remote "checkout" operation, it is
usually used with "bare" repositories. A bare repository is just the
git database without a working copy. It is most useful for servers where
there is no reason to have editable files checked out.
For safety, git push will allow only a
"fast-forward" merge where the
local commits derive from the remote head. If the local head and remote
head have both changed, you must perform a full merge (which will create a
new commit deriving from both heads). Full merges must be done locally,
so all this really means is you must call git pull
before git push
if someone else committed something first.
Conclusion
This article is meant only to provide an introduction to some of Git's most basic features and usage. Git is incredibly powerful and has a lot more capabilities beyond what I had space to cover here. But, once you realize all the features are based on the same core concepts, it becomes straightforward to learn the rest.
Check out the Resources section for some sites where you can learn more. Also, don't forget to read the git man page.
Resources
Git Home Page: http://git-scm.com
Git Community Book: http://book.git-scm.com
Why Git Is Better Than X: http://whygitisbetterthanx.com
Google Tech Talk: Linus Torvalds on Git: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4XpnKHJAok8
- « first
- ‹ previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
Today’s modular x86 servers are compute-centric, designed as a least common denominator to support a wide range of IT workloads. Those generic, virtualized IT workloads have much different resource optimization requirements than hyperscale and cloud applications. They have resulted in a “one size fits all” enterprise IT architecture that is not optimized for a specific set of IT workloads, and especially not emerging hyperscale workloads, such as web applications, big data, and object storage. In this report, you will learn how shifting the focus from traditional compute-centric IT architectures to an innovative disaggregated fabric-based architecture can optimize and scale your data center.
Sponsored by AMD
Built-in forensics, incident response, and security with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Every security policy provides guidance and requirements for ensuring adequate protection of information and data, as well as high-level technical and administrative security requirements for a system in a given environment. Traditionally, providing security for a system focuses on the confidentiality of the information on it. However, protecting the data integrity and system and data availability is just as important. For example, when processing United States intelligence information, there are three attributes that require protection: confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
Learn more about catching the bad guy in this free white paper.
Sponsored by DLT Solutions
| Making Linux and Android Get Along (It's Not as Hard as It Sounds) | May 16, 2013 |
| Drupal Is a Framework: Why Everyone Needs to Understand This | May 15, 2013 |
| Home, My Backup Data Center | May 13, 2013 |
| Non-Linux FOSS: Seashore | May 10, 2013 |
| Trying to Tame the Tablet | May 08, 2013 |
| Dart: a New Web Programming Experience | May 07, 2013 |
- RSS Feeds
- Making Linux and Android Get Along (It's Not as Hard as It Sounds)
- New Products
- Drupal Is a Framework: Why Everyone Needs to Understand This
- A Topic for Discussion - Open Source Feature-Richness?
- Home, My Backup Data Center
- Validate an E-Mail Address with PHP, the Right Way
- Tech Tip: Really Simple HTTP Server with Python
- New Products
- Trying to Tame the Tablet
- git-annex assistant
2 hours 1 min ago - direct cable connection
2 hours 23 min ago - Agreed on AirDroid. With my
2 hours 33 min ago - I just learned this
2 hours 38 min ago - enterprise
3 hours 8 min ago - not living upto the mobile revolution
5 hours 59 min ago - Deceptive Advertising and
6 hours 34 min ago - Let\'s declare that you have
6 hours 35 min ago - Alterations in Contest Due
6 hours 37 min ago - At a numbers mindset, your
6 hours 38 min ago
Enter to Win an Adafruit Prototyping Pi Plate Kit for Raspberry Pi

It's Raspberry Pi month at Linux Journal. Each week in May, Adafruit will be giving away a Pi-related prize to a lucky, randomly drawn LJ reader. Winners will be announced weekly.
Fill out the fields below to enter to win this week's prize-- a Prototyping Pi Plate Kit for Raspberry Pi.
Congratulations to our winners so far:
- 5-8-13, Pi Starter Pack: Jack Davis
- 5-15-13, Pi Model B 512MB RAM: Patrick Dunn
- Next winner announced on 5-21-13!
Free Webinar: Linux Backup and Recovery
Most companies incorporate backup procedures for critical data, which can be restored quickly if a loss occurs. However, fewer companies are prepared for catastrophic system failures, in which they lose all data, the entire operating system, applications, settings, patches and more, reducing their system(s) to “bare metal.” After all, before data can be restored to a system, there must be a system to restore it to.
In this one hour webinar, learn how to enhance your existing backup strategies for better disaster recovery preparedness using Storix System Backup Administrator (SBAdmin), a highly flexible bare-metal recovery solution for UNIX and Linux systems.



Comments
Interesting
Good to read this informative article here on this website. It’s an interesting post.
Thank you! wintersport oostenrijk chalet / wintersport oostenrijk chalet
Ich selber habe einige
Ich selber habe einige Webseiten und brauchte genau das, was ich hier lesen konnte. Könnte ja mal schauen, ob ich es richtig gemacht habe.
Liebe Grüße
http://www.flirtcenter24.de/
About Git
Worth keeping
Checking Out A Small Subset Of Files On A Small Device?
The limitation that I immediately ran into when I considered migrating to git is to check out some (rather randomly selected) subset of files on a small/portable computing device.
Say I have a big repository of files and I only needed a very small subset of files while on the go -- to refer to and to be edited.
It was originally a small netbook computer where I could check out a few directories from a big repository and be able to edit files on the netbook computer while on the bus.
Netbook might have grown larger with regard to its disk storage, but now, I want to do the same on an Android phone.
git's sparse checkout feature still pulls the entire repository to the device. It only checkout a subset of files to give the appearance of sparse checkout, but it doesn't resolve the storage issue.
I don't think git submodules help, as, I think, one can't easily move selected files across repositories with all history intact (i.e., every now and then, add some additional directories to the list available to small devices by moving them to a submodule, when it becomes necessary), as one can easily do with CVS.
The only solution that I can think of is to remotely mount .git/objects/ directory and deal with its limitation.
Is there any creative brain power would find a solution lift this limitation?
Thanks.
Split-able git Tree?
Given that:
Tree object = Blobs file names + permissions + Blobs collection.
Can splitting git repository be implemented by splitting some git's Tree object into 2 (sub-) Tree objects on a personal workstation, (perhaps new Commit objects to keep track of the split,) allowing a smaller tree be checked out to a small device.
Remote changes (done by others) can, then, be merged to the personal workstation (as staging), before merging to the splitted Tree branches for the small devices if necessary.
Changes on the small devices can be merged to the personal workstation (as staging), before being pulled by others?
Would that solve the disk space problem by limiting checkout to a small (sub-) Tree?
If this idea works, would some able developer turns it into an implementation?
Thanks.
On the guarantees of SHA1
First of all I want to thank the author for this clear and concise article.
However, I want to point out some inaccuracy regarding the paragraph on SHA1. The author states that SHA1 guarantees that the data in the blobs is different, and that the chance that two pieces of data have the same SHA1 is infinitesimally small. I disagree on this point.
The 40-character string that SHA1 outputs gives us 16^40 = 2^160 ~~ 10^16 different checksums. Although this is big enough to assume the above descripted 'guarantee', the claim about the infinitesimal chance is just wrong.
Consider for example 2^160 + 1 pairwise distinct files (this is data, be it hypothetical). The chance that there will be two different pieces of data in this set having the same checksum is 1. And 1 is very very different from infinitesimal.
I agree that it is highly unlikely that two such files will occur in practice, let alone in one project. (For example, each person on earth would have to create about 100.000 distinct files, to come close to the 2^160 files.) Still I wanted to point this out about the cryptographic features of SHA1.
There is not enough matter in
There is not enough matter in the universe to store 2^64 bits, much less 2^160 bits, even if you stored 1 bit per atom.
Your math is *way* off. 2^160
Your math is *way* off. 2^160 ~~ 10^48.
Very nice introduction
Congrats for a very clear and concise introduction for something as difficult to teach as git.
I love git, and had to give git training to Subversion users -- hard work! It really amounts to unlearning SVN and learn something completely new.