The Fun of LDAP - objectClass Attributes
OK - I actually like and enjoy LDAP, but do not allow that to cloud your judgment. LDAP took much more of my time and effort to learn than Bind and/or DNS. And I recall sitting in front of DNS chapters wondering why we needed another language to do something as easy as mapping a friendly name to an IP address. This jargon stuff has value though such as constraing insomnia.
So, if you need some sleep and don't care about writers who use phrases like "much more", then we can move along and discuss the notion of an objectClass. Are we having fun yet?
The entries in an LDAP directory, like the entries in a phone book or contact list require objectClass attributes which need at least one value. That's just common sense right?
Think of an objectClass value as a template for the information you wish to store in an entry or to make the jargon complete in the name space.
We haven't touched on distinguished names and relative distinguished names but pretend like you know what they mean, please. In the example below, think of an "organizational unit" as the top of a hierarchical file system with limbs below it.
The top of directory for our purpose is ou=computers,dc=centralsoft,dc=org. So, if you wanted to find a list of computers in centralsoft.org, you would have this area of the directory called computers. Computers would appear in your LDAP browser in plain English as simply "Computers" and below that one or more computers.
In LDAP parlance setting up the area of the directory for computers would look like this:
description: Container for all computers existing within the centralsoft.org domain
The objectClass attribute we used in this example was "pc". The only pc that the directory contains at the moment is "wkst01". You could just as easily used "srv01" for "server01". That's not the point though.
Technically speaking, of course, RFCs define many attributes we find in LDAP schemas. For example RFC 2256 defines the attribute for telephoneNumber, which intuitively makes total sense to the average user of a contact list (sic).
We just touched the surface of the objectClass discussion. Don't worry if it does not make much sense at this point. Just know that in the language or jargon of LDAP, you'll have to get it about objectClass attributes or you won't have much to do with constructing LDAP directories.
Practical Task Scheduling Deployment
July 20, 2016 12:00 pm CDT
One of the best things about the UNIX environment (aside from being stable and efficient) is the vast array of software tools available to help you do your job. Traditionally, a UNIX tool does only one thing, but does that one thing very well. For example, grep is very easy to use and can search vast amounts of data quickly. The find tool can find a particular file or files based on all kinds of criteria. It's pretty easy to string these tools together to build even more powerful tools, such as a tool that finds all of the .log files in the /home directory and searches each one for a particular entry. This erector-set mentality allows UNIX system administrators to seem to always have the right tool for the job.
Cron traditionally has been considered another such a tool for job scheduling, but is it enough? This webinar considers that very question. The first part builds on a previous Geek Guide, Beyond Cron, and briefly describes how to know when it might be time to consider upgrading your job scheduling infrastructure. The second part presents an actual planning and implementation framework.
Join Linux Journal's Mike Diehl and Pat Cameron of Help Systems.
Free to Linux Journal readers.Register Now!
- SUSE LLC's SUSE Manager
- Murat Yener and Onur Dundar's Expert Android Studio (Wrox)
- My +1 Sword of Productivity
- Managing Linux Using Puppet
- Non-Linux FOSS: Caffeine!
- Doing for User Space What We Did for Kernel Space
- SuperTuxKart 0.9.2 Released
- Google's SwiftShader Released
- Parsing an RSS News Feed with a Bash Script
- Rogue Wave Software's Zend Server
With all the industry talk about the benefits of Linux on Power and all the performance advantages offered by its open architecture, you may be considering a move in that direction. If you are thinking about analytics, big data and cloud computing, you would be right to evaluate Power. The idea of using commodity x86 hardware and replacing it every three years is an outdated cost model. It doesn’t consider the total cost of ownership, and it doesn’t consider the advantage of real processing power, high-availability and multithreading like a demon.
This ebook takes a look at some of the practical applications of the Linux on Power platform and ways you might bring all the performance power of this open architecture to bear for your organization. There are no smoke and mirrors here—just hard, cold, empirical evidence provided by independent sources. I also consider some innovative ways Linux on Power will be used in the future.Get the Guide