A Face Lift For The MPL
As Phyllis Diller would attest, a face lift isn't necessarily a bad thing. Most things — legalese included — can use a good going over from time to time, and that's just what the good people at Mozilla will be doing this year.
The face being lifted, as it were, is the well-known Mozilla Public License, the legal agreement that covers use of the organization's many software projects. The original MPL, version 1.0, was released some twelve years ago, the result of what Mozilla Foundation Chair Mitchell Baker describes as "frantic drafting." A second version (1.1) followed, and continues to be the license in force for Mozilla users everywhere.
Now, more than ten years later, 1.1's number is up — or at least will be going up. According to Baker, 2010 will be the year of the revision, with Mozilla seeking public comment from community members on what the next version of the widely-used license should say. She notes that Mozilla has received a great deal of input on the license in the past decade, and will utilize it, along with preliminary comments from the community, to create a working draft from which further comment will stem.
Baker announced the decision in a post to her "Lizard Wrangling" blog, saying:
It’s time to look at updating the MPL. It’s time to see if we can make the MPL easier to use and incorporate a decade’s worth of experience. In particular I’m hoping to modernize and simplify the license while still keeping the things that have made it and the Mozilla project such a success.
A provisional group has been formed to lead the project, including Gerv Markham, Luis Villa, Harvey Anderson, and Baker — her post indicates that the group is expected to expand as the project moves forward. Public comment will be solicited in several ways, including a "comment tool" for discussion of the license's language and drafting, a mailing list for non-language/drafting commentary, and a special licensing section of the Mozilla website. All members of the community are encouraged to join in the discussion.
Mozilla hopes to complete the project by the end of 2010.
Justin Ryan is a Contributing Editor for Linux Journal.
Today’s modular x86 servers are compute-centric, designed as a least common denominator to support a wide range of IT workloads. Those generic, virtualized IT workloads have much different resource optimization requirements than hyperscale and cloud applications. They have resulted in a “one size fits all” enterprise IT architecture that is not optimized for a specific set of IT workloads, and especially not emerging hyperscale workloads, such as web applications, big data, and object storage. In this report, you will learn how shifting the focus from traditional compute-centric IT architectures to an innovative disaggregated fabric-based architecture can optimize and scale your data center.
Sponsored by AMD
Built-in forensics, incident response, and security with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Every security policy provides guidance and requirements for ensuring adequate protection of information and data, as well as high-level technical and administrative security requirements for a system in a given environment. Traditionally, providing security for a system focuses on the confidentiality of the information on it. However, protecting the data integrity and system and data availability is just as important. For example, when processing United States intelligence information, there are three attributes that require protection: confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
Learn more about catching the bad guy in this free white paper.
Sponsored by DLT Solutions
| Making Linux and Android Get Along (It's Not as Hard as It Sounds) | May 16, 2013 |
| Drupal Is a Framework: Why Everyone Needs to Understand This | May 15, 2013 |
| Home, My Backup Data Center | May 13, 2013 |
| Non-Linux FOSS: Seashore | May 10, 2013 |
| Trying to Tame the Tablet | May 08, 2013 |
| Dart: a New Web Programming Experience | May 07, 2013 |
- RSS Feeds
- Making Linux and Android Get Along (It's Not as Hard as It Sounds)
- New Products
- Drupal Is a Framework: Why Everyone Needs to Understand This
- A Topic for Discussion - Open Source Feature-Richness?
- Home, My Backup Data Center
- Validate an E-Mail Address with PHP, the Right Way
- Trying to Tame the Tablet
- New Products
- Tech Tip: Really Simple HTTP Server with Python
- git-annex assistant
1 hour 39 min ago - direct cable connection
2 hours 1 min ago - Agreed on AirDroid. With my
2 hours 12 min ago - I just learned this
2 hours 16 min ago - enterprise
2 hours 46 min ago - not living upto the mobile revolution
5 hours 37 min ago - Deceptive Advertising and
6 hours 13 min ago - Let\'s declare that you have
6 hours 14 min ago - Alterations in Contest Due
6 hours 15 min ago - At a numbers mindset, your
6 hours 16 min ago
Enter to Win an Adafruit Prototyping Pi Plate Kit for Raspberry Pi

It's Raspberry Pi month at Linux Journal. Each week in May, Adafruit will be giving away a Pi-related prize to a lucky, randomly drawn LJ reader. Winners will be announced weekly.
Fill out the fields below to enter to win this week's prize-- a Prototyping Pi Plate Kit for Raspberry Pi.
Congratulations to our winners so far:
- 5-8-13, Pi Starter Pack: Jack Davis
- 5-15-13, Pi Model B 512MB RAM: Patrick Dunn
- Next winner announced on 5-21-13!
Free Webinar: Linux Backup and Recovery
Most companies incorporate backup procedures for critical data, which can be restored quickly if a loss occurs. However, fewer companies are prepared for catastrophic system failures, in which they lose all data, the entire operating system, applications, settings, patches and more, reducing their system(s) to “bare metal.” After all, before data can be restored to a system, there must be a system to restore it to.
In this one hour webinar, learn how to enhance your existing backup strategies for better disaster recovery preparedness using Storix System Backup Administrator (SBAdmin), a highly flexible bare-metal recovery solution for UNIX and Linux systems.



Comments
GPLv2 and LGPLv2.1
Is that the same as mpl??
Peace
Ding King Dent Repair
Gold In IRA
Google Policies
Hi Justin,
Something similar to new google policies for Chrome extensions.
A few more items i can't remember right away regarding export policies for secure socket routines featured by MPL 1.1 which address specific builds for the libnss.so regarding location ban. Actually some of us remember MPL 1.0 quite good.
Solicitors in
Face Lift
Hi Justin thanks for the editorial... Lets hope the project is completed by the end of 2010
Nigel - UK
Fylde Computer Repairs
Thanks for sharing with us
Thanks for sharing with us buddy.
Keep it up.
cna certification
Thank you..
Yor fine tahnak you admin
fine
Thnak you fine admin
Thanks
Katılıyorum ben şahsen yani gerçi dilimizi nebilicen ?
Do you understand me ?
This is interesting. First
This is interesting. First off I didn't even know mozilla had been around for 12 years! But why do they really need to revise the documents?
Hydroxycut | Extenze
proxy list
through
Actually some of us remember MPL 1.0 quite good. Something to take on count by the rest of the OS community like the zero liability to upgrade or maintain the code which is entirely left in hands of the firefox community.
MPL 1.1 included something like the non disclosure of newer bugs and the ability to accept extensions without any Mozilla labs testing. Something similar to new google policies for Chrome extensions.
A few more items i can't remember right away regarding export policies for secure socket routines featured by MPL 1.1 which address specific builds for the libnss.so regarding location ban.
I wonder if some agree?