Eeny, Meeny, Miney, Xubuntu...
I know that about six billion people have compared and contrasted the differences between the Ubuntu variants. Really, the choice comes down to personal preference, and usually it comes down to the classic Gnome vs KDE war. For years, I avoided X11 altogether, because most of the work I did was in the terminal, but even old CLI guys like me can see that a GUI is really a requirement in today's tech world.
For the record, since it's been available, I've usually used straight up Ubuntu. With all the stories recently on the Linux Journal website, however, I felt the urge to try KDE, in the form of Kubuntu. While I'm sure it will offend half the people reading, I have to admit that I really don't like Kubuntu. And the cliche, "it's not you it's me" rule applies here as well. KDE is great, but it's just not great for me. I really tried to like it, I mean, I read that Linus himself is a KDE user. I think the reason it turns me off is that I don't like the mainline applications. I don't like Konqueror, Dophin, Kmail, Kaffeine, Amarok, or even Kterminal. So for my daily use, I end up doing my best to avoid all the applications that are so tightly (and well) integrated into the system. And artsd? Ick. (I guess KDE4 will help with that, but still.)
Gnome is better (again, for me -- no flame wars now...), but it seems bloated. I can't really say why, but it just feels sluggish. I can't seem to configure it the way I prefer either. The gconf stuff is just complicated, and honestly, reminds me of the Windows registry thing. I do like the Gnome apps better, but even with that, I don't use Evolution. It's too much like Outlook, which I really really don't like. :)
So what's a lazy user to do? Well, you could try NotYourBuntu -- but that only works for me (and then, only in my imagination). ;) If you're really not happy with Gnome or KDE, however, Xubuntu offers a really nice alternative wrapped around the XFCE desktop. It's fast, light, and doesn't get in the way. I don't feel as tied to specific applications, and mix & matching my favorites from the Gnome and KDE lineups seems to work very well. Since my application preferences vary widely, that's really important to me.
Xubuntu might not be for everyone, but if KDE doesn't light your fire, and Gnome seems like it uses more resources than you can spare -- I'd suggest giving XFCE a try. The Xubuntu installer works just like the other *buntu flavors, and it's everything I've ever wanted in a distro. Give it a try, you might like it.
And if you don't? Well, that's what's great about Linux. If you don't like it, you don't have to use it. It's all about choice.
When it comes down to it, I love Linux any way it's sliced. Picking one distro or desktop manager over another is a lot like picking a favorite ice cream. Even the flavor you like the least is still ice cream!
Shawn Powers is an Associate Editor for Linux Journal. You might find him chatting on the IRC channel, or Twitter
Today’s modular x86 servers are compute-centric, designed as a least common denominator to support a wide range of IT workloads. Those generic, virtualized IT workloads have much different resource optimization requirements than hyperscale and cloud applications. They have resulted in a “one size fits all” enterprise IT architecture that is not optimized for a specific set of IT workloads, and especially not emerging hyperscale workloads, such as web applications, big data, and object storage. In this report, you will learn how shifting the focus from traditional compute-centric IT architectures to an innovative disaggregated fabric-based architecture can optimize and scale your data center.
Sponsored by AMD
Built-in forensics, incident response, and security with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Every security policy provides guidance and requirements for ensuring adequate protection of information and data, as well as high-level technical and administrative security requirements for a system in a given environment. Traditionally, providing security for a system focuses on the confidentiality of the information on it. However, protecting the data integrity and system and data availability is just as important. For example, when processing United States intelligence information, there are three attributes that require protection: confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
Learn more about catching the bad guy in this free white paper.
Sponsored by DLT Solutions
| Using Salt Stack and Vagrant for Drupal Development | May 20, 2013 |
| Making Linux and Android Get Along (It's Not as Hard as It Sounds) | May 16, 2013 |
| Drupal Is a Framework: Why Everyone Needs to Understand This | May 15, 2013 |
| Home, My Backup Data Center | May 13, 2013 |
| Non-Linux FOSS: Seashore | May 10, 2013 |
| Trying to Tame the Tablet | May 08, 2013 |
- Using Salt Stack and Vagrant for Drupal Development
- Making Linux and Android Get Along (It's Not as Hard as It Sounds)
- New Products
- Validate an E-Mail Address with PHP, the Right Way
- Drupal Is a Framework: Why Everyone Needs to Understand This
- A Topic for Discussion - Open Source Feature-Richness?
- Home, My Backup Data Center
- RSS Feeds
- New Products
- New Products
- I like your topic on android
3 min 6 sec ago - Reply to comment | Linux Journal
24 min 16 sec ago - This is the easiest tutorial
6 hours 38 min ago - Ahh, the Koolaid.
12 hours 17 min ago - git-annex assistant
18 hours 16 min ago - direct cable connection
18 hours 39 min ago - Agreed on AirDroid. With my
18 hours 49 min ago - I just learned this
18 hours 53 min ago - enterprise
19 hours 23 min ago - not living upto the mobile revolution
22 hours 15 min ago
Enter to Win an Adafruit Prototyping Pi Plate Kit for Raspberry Pi

It's Raspberry Pi month at Linux Journal. Each week in May, Adafruit will be giving away a Pi-related prize to a lucky, randomly drawn LJ reader. Winners will be announced weekly.
Fill out the fields below to enter to win this week's prize-- a Prototyping Pi Plate Kit for Raspberry Pi.
Congratulations to our winners so far:
- 5-8-13, Pi Starter Pack: Jack Davis
- 5-15-13, Pi Model B 512MB RAM: Patrick Dunn
- Next winner announced on 5-21-13!
Free Webinar: Linux Backup and Recovery
Most companies incorporate backup procedures for critical data, which can be restored quickly if a loss occurs. However, fewer companies are prepared for catastrophic system failures, in which they lose all data, the entire operating system, applications, settings, patches and more, reducing their system(s) to “bare metal.” After all, before data can be restored to a system, there must be a system to restore it to.
In this one hour webinar, learn how to enhance your existing backup strategies for better disaster recovery preparedness using Storix System Backup Administrator (SBAdmin), a highly flexible bare-metal recovery solution for UNIX and Linux systems.



Comments
xubuntu vs ubuntu
great things make it difference...
xubuntu
To date, I haven't had much success using any ubuntu distros. There was always some glitch that annoyed me enough to toss it. Recently I inherited (literally) a Dell Inspiron 1501 w/2G@533 and the AMD 64 x 2 @ 1.7GHz. I installed Kubuntu on it and had to verify that the 1501 wasn't actually running a PIII w/128MB and no swap. As a matter of fact, I have an old PIII w/256MB running PCLinuxOS 2007 that seems to run faster. So Kubuntu was tossed.
Then I installed xubuntu (just 'cuz I REALLY enjoy installing OSes) and now the Inspiron runs more respectably. It's still not as quick as I'd like, but it's WAY faster than kubuntu was. I think I'll keep it and tweak it for a while.
Fluxbox
I like Xubuntu in the respect that it is light and fast, but I don't like the feel of it. Could have been that I didn't mess around with the themes. I recently just installed a fluxbox window manager, and loved it so much, I uninstalled anything that had to do with Gnome or KDE. I pretty much uninstalled everything, installed fluxbox, and selected what programs I wanted for what purpose. Runs LIGHTNING fast (as in, VMWare Player running Windows 2000 flawlessly with Age of Empires and WinAmp playing on a 1.8 GHz processor and only 512 of RAM, while running Firefox and Pidgin in the background on my linux side.) I highly recommend trying it out.
Xubuntu great on laptops
When the last Ubuntu upgrades rolled around (7.10), I moved my desktop machines and laptop to it. Although Ubuntu was fine on the desktops, it was truly awful (and, for all intents and purposes, unusable on my laptop). After many, many tweaks and installs, I tried Xubuntu and have yet to look back. My laptop runs like a rocket under Xubuntu ...
Paul Barry
Hey "old CLI guy"!
sudo apt-get remove your shitty app
sudo apt-get install your fav app
You've got a Kubuntu-er Thinking Xubuntu
I got hooked on KDE a few years ago so Kubuntu was a natural fit for me. I did load Xubuntu on a low powered, rarely used laptop and it performed fine. I sort of forgot about Xubuntu until you mentioned it in this article. I've got just the machine to load it on time permitting. It has been running SUSE 9.3(dual boot with XP rarely occupying RAM) for a couple of years and could use a new look. That machine mostly sits running a web cam cron job so a bloated GUI isn't needed. Thanks for the Xreminder. Choices are a wonderful thing. Besides incredible reliability and ease of installation, my Linux choices haven't forced me to choose upgraded hardware just to get the latest distro. That's a wonderful thing too. Thanks for Xpressing what sounds like a good choice to me.
Mike Roberts is a bewildered Linux Journal Reader Advisory Panelist.
EEE PC
I started running xubuntu on my eee pc rather than the default xandros distro and am loving it. I have been running gnome ubuntu on my thinkpad for a few years and was quite content but I must say I am definitely liking xubuntu at the moment.
all about choice again
Im so sick of hearing the "Linux is all about choice" mantra - I cant begin to describe how sick. Apart from the fact that the phrase is meaningless, it is only used as a get-out-of-jail-free card whenever one of the many shortcomings of Linux is exposed. Then we get the "well if you dont like distro x (because its bug ridden like all the other ones) then you don't have to use it" followed by the Linux choice mantra.
Actually Linux is surely all about computing not choice - its an operating system / application bazaar not interior decoration.
The only reason choice is good for Linux is that you can choose not to use it, and so avoid the pain of trying to get the bloody thing to work properly.
Please, SitDown Little Mr Balmer...
Waaaa...
Never learned to RTFM so now Blame the Educators...
Typical Troll.
Now go do your homework, so mommy will make-oo warm milk and cookies.
And since you can't fine your butt with both hands in the dark, maybe she'll wipe it for you too.
Nyt-nyt 'teevy-weevy.
Agreed. It's great to read
Agreed. It's great to read about someones opinion, but this post shouldn't be on the linuxtoday.com frontpage.
Column is a regular on the front page
While I'll easily concede the points made thus far about no performance metrics reported, this column is a regular here. The editors can put whatever they want here, even if it's a story about how much better potatoes are in Idaho. Get over it.
yawn
too much opinion, no facts about xfce's footprint, main points are disliking apps like amarok. My worst read of the night without a doubt.
-Signed gnome desktop user/compiz window manager user /awn panel user/kde app user