The DNS Bug: Why You Should Care
It's not every day that the New York Times writes articles about the Domain Name System, but then again this DNS bug is anything but normal.
It's been over five weeks now since Dan Kaminsky first announced the major flaw that he found in the DNS protocol. Although most of the details of the bug have been public for a few weeks now, it wasn't until last week at the Black Hat and Defcon conferences in Las Vegas that Kaminsky explained the depth of the issue. As I listened to him describe the ways this bug can be exploited my heart dropped down into my stomach and I felt a little sick. My friend was only half joking when he whispered to me "I'm thinking about transferring to accounting."
Yes, the bug is that bad. Everyone should be paying attention to this one. Fortunately, most of the big sites out there have been patched, for now. But the current patch only buys us some time, it doesn't actually fix the real problem.
In case you are just joining the party, the bug that Dan found can be used by an attacker to poison DNS records. In other words, he can redirect your email, instant messages, website visits, or any other traffic that relies on DNS. Which, of course, means all traffic. Yes, that sounds scary, but it seems that most people don't fully appreciate the degree to which this can be exploited. Dan's presentation made it crystal clear.
What This Means For You
Let's start with a quote from George Kurtz, a VP at McAfee:
If you control the DNS servers, you control the Internet.
This exploit effectively grants control of the DNS servers to anyone clever enough to execute the attack. When you control DNS you also control email. And when you control email you also control, well, everything.
Email is Broken
Assume for a moment that I've used this DNS exploit to take control of your email account. The most obvious effect is that I can now read your mail. Also, I can read your mail and continue forwarding it to you, so that you never realize there is a problem. I can add attachments to your messages, or infect existing attachments from people you trust with viruses or malware. When your best friend sends a link to you about that funny video on YouTube, well, I can rewrite that link to go anywhere I want.
Of course, we all know that nobody out there uses the Internet mail system to do harm, right? Just imagine, instead of getting normal annoying spam like you've been seeing for years now, you also now have to worry about legitimate messages from your friends being the carriers of trouble.
So how else can I use email to my advantage? Kaminsky pointed out that almost every website out there relies on your email address to verify your identity. Using the whois database I can find out who the administrative contact is for, say, microsoft.com and claim that email address. Then I just browse to the website of the registrar for microsoft.com, click on the "forgot my password" link, and have the password for that account reset. Since I'm getting the email for that account, I'll also get the link they send me that says "please click here to verify your new password." At that point I effectively own microsoft.com and can do whatever I want, including changing the contact email address, or transferring it to a different registrar.
Think about that the next time you see a "Forgot my password" link on a website.
SSL is Broken
Dan Kaminsky said that many people were pointing to SSL as a safety measure. He told them they should be more cafeful. After all, how does one go about registering a SSL certificate? Anyone is allowed to buy a certificate, but they must show some authoritity over the domain. This authoritity is checked by the certificate authorities (CA) by using DNS, typically in one of three ways:
- The CA looks up the domain via whois
- The CA sends an email to an address they have on record
- The CA checks for a specially named file on the website's server
As Dan pointed out in his talk, all three of these methods rely on DNS, which we have poisoned. Just because that site you are visiting uses SSL doesn't mean it's the site you think it is. :)
The Web is Broken
Ok, so enough about email. Why else should you care? (as if that weren't enough already) Well, how many sites do you think you visit that have the following code embedded in them?
Desktop Apps are Broken
Kaminsky also pointed out that we have now entered an era where the Internet has expanded to the desktop. Many applications are useless without an Internet connection, such as AIM/ICQ/Jabber/etc, iTunes, Skype and most popular games. By poisoning the DNS entry for login.oscar.aol.com I can intercept AIM messages for anyone who is using that DNS server. The same holds for any other Desktop application that connects to the Internet.
Perhaps most worriesome are mechanisms for applying automatic updates. Yes, this includes attacks on popular Linux package management systems such as apt-get and yum. But it goes beyond that, and into systems that automatically update such as iTunes, Mac OS X, Open Office, Winzip, Winamp, and others. Imagine what an attacker could accomplish if he could poison swquery.apple.com and swscan.apple.com in Comcast's DNS servers. Mac OS X, as well as iTunes, periodically checks for software updates in the background, and pops up a notification if there are upgrades to be applied. An attacker could push down any software update and the innocent user would never know the difference.
Everything Else is Broken, Too
Of course, these are just some of the reasons an attacker may want to poison DNS. Kaminsky covers many more in his presentation, including CDN population, writing SSL cookies, and discovering internal addresses for databases, backup servers, and authentication services. He specifically states that it is indeed possible to poison the top level domains, including com, net, and org. That's right, an attacker can intercept all DNS requests for .com. This means that he not only gets to respond to your questions, but also find out what questions you are asking. Those "private" DNS records are no longer private (they never were, really).
The initial patch that the vendors released on July 8th has been deployed in most places by now, but again, it is only a temporary solution. It just makes it harder for an attacker to poison DNS - it doesn't make it impossible. In fact, a Russian researcher named Evgeniy Polyakov has already demonstrated that it is possible to poison the latest patched BIND DNS server with two standard desktop PCs and a gigabit ethernet connection. Instead of 10 seconds it took him 10 hours, and required a lot of traffic.
We are still in trouble, but this is the best we have for now.
- Reply to comment | Linux Journal
46 min 41 sec ago
15 hours 13 min ago
- Why choose a Flash based product?
15 hours 50 min ago
1 day 4 hours ago
1 day 20 hours ago
- Thanks for clearing that up.
2 days 1 hour ago
- Nice coding on the cake. I
2 days 13 hours ago
- Baker's identity
2 days 18 hours ago
- Uber jealous
2 days 22 hours ago
- Reality is disapointing
3 days 9 hours ago