Book Excerpt: A Practical Guide to Fedora and Red Hat Enterprise Linux
The init Daemon
The init daemon is the system and service manager for Linux. It is the first true process Linux starts when it boots and as such, has a PID of 1 and is the ancestor of all processes. The init daemon has been around since the early days of UNIX, and many people have worked to improve it. The first Linux init daemon was based on the UNIX System V init daemon and is referred to as SysVinit (System V init daemon).
Because SysVinit does not deal well with modern hardware, including hotplug devices, USB hard and flash drives, and network-mounted filesystems, Fedora/RHEL recently replaced it with the Upstart init daemon (http://upstart.ubuntu.com/ and http://upstart.ubuntu.com/wiki). Fedora 15 has moved past Upstart to systemd init daemon, which is described next. Several other replacements for SysVinit are also available. One of the most prominent is initng (http://initng.sourceforge.net/trac). In addition, Solaris uses SMF (Service Management Facility), and MacOS uses launchd.
The systemd init Daemon (Fedora)
The name systemd comprises system, which systemd manages, followed by d. Under UNIX/Linux, daemon names frequently end in d: systemd is the system daemon. At boot time, systemd renames itself init, so you will not see a process named systemd. However, init is simply a link to systemd:
$ ls -l /sbin/init lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 14 04-22 08:47 /sbin/init -> ../bin/systemd
The name is also a play on words with System D, a reference to the French dérouillard (to untangle) or démerder. System D is a manner of responding to challenges that requires fast thinking, adapting, and improvising.
The systemd init daemon is a drop-in replacement for SysVinit; most of the administration tools that worked with SysVinit and Upstart work with systemd. Although systemd is new, most of the user interfaces pertinent to administrators will remain stable (http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/InterfaceStabilityPromise). A GUI to systemd is under development.
Use apropos to list man pages that pertain to systemd (apropos systemd). Some of the most interesting of these are systemd, systemctl, systemd.unit, and systemd.special.
systemd home page: http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd
Fedora systemd home page: fedoraproject.org/wiki/Systemd
Fedora systemd feature list: fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/systemd
SysVinit to systemd conversion notes: fedoraproject.org/wiki/SysVinit_to_Systemd_Cheatsheet
List of services that run natively under systemd: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Johannbg/QA/Systemd/compatability
Blog about systemd by its creator, Lennart Poettering: 0pointer.de/blog/projects/systemd.html
systemd stability promise: http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/InterfaceStabilityPromise
Service Units and Target Units
The systemd init daemon is based on the concept of units, each of which has a name and type. Typically information about a unit is stored in a file that has the same name as the unit (e.g., dbus.service). The types of units are service, socket, device, mount, automount, target, snapshot, timer, swap, and path. This section discusses service and target units, which are critical to controlling daemons and runlevel under systemd.
A service unit refers to a daemon (service) that systemd controls, including those controlled natively by systemd and those controlled by systemd via SysVinit scripts. For example, systemd controls the ntpd daemon natively via the ntpd.service service unit.
A target unit groups other units. Of concern in this section are targets that control the system runlevel. By default, Fedora activates graphical.target, which brings the system to a runlevel that equates to what was formerly called runlevel 5 (multiuser graphical mode). Activating multi-user.target brings the system to what was formerly called runlevel 3 (multiuser textual mode).
Terminology: server, service, daemon
A daemon, such as ntpd or cupsd, provides a service that runs on a server. The daemon itself is also sometimes referred to as a server. These three terms can be used interchangeably.
The systemd init daemon does not support runlevels the way SysVinit did. It supports target units, which parallel runlevels but are different. To ease the transition, this book continues to use the term runlevel to refer to target units. One difference between SysVinit runlevels and systemd target units is that the former can be changed only when the system changes runlevels while the latter can be activated by any of a large group of triggers. Another difference is that a systemd-based system can activate more than one target unit at a time, allowing the system to be in more than one runlevel at a time. For example, graphical.target pulls in multi-user.target so they are both active at the same time.
systemd runlevels differ from SysVinit runlevels - For consistency and clarity during the transition from SysVinit to systemd, this book refers to systemd target units as runlevels. Target units are not true runlevels, but they perform a function similar to the function performed by SysVinit runlevels.
Wants and Requires
Under systemd, the terms wants and requires specify units that are to be activated when the unit that wants or requires the other unit is activated. A unit that requires another unit will not start if the other unit is not available and will quit if the other unit becomes unavailable while the first unit is active. Wants is similar to requires, except a unit that wants another unit will not fail if the wanted unit is not available.
Fast/Flexible Linux OS Recovery
On Demand Now
In this live one-hour webinar, learn how to enhance your existing backup strategies for complete disaster recovery preparedness using Storix System Backup Administrator (SBAdmin), a highly flexible full-system recovery solution for UNIX and Linux systems.
Join Linux Journal's Shawn Powers and David Huffman, President/CEO, Storix, Inc.
Free to Linux Journal readers.Register Now!
- Google's Abacus Project: It's All about Trust
- Download "Linux Management with Red Hat Satellite: Measuring Business Impact and ROI"
- Seeing Red and Getting Sleep
- Fancy Tricks for Changing Numeric Base
- Secure Desktops with Qubes: Introduction
- Working with Command Arguments
- Secure Desktops with Qubes: Installation
- CentOS 6.8 Released
- Linux Mint 18
- The Italian Army Switches to LibreOffice
Until recently, IBM’s Power Platform was looked upon as being the system that hosted IBM’s flavor of UNIX and proprietary operating system called IBM i. These servers often are found in medium-size businesses running ERP, CRM and financials for on-premise customers. By enabling the Power platform to run the Linux OS, IBM now has positioned Power to be the platform of choice for those already running Linux that are facing scalability issues, especially customers looking at analytics, big data or cloud computing.
￼Running Linux on IBM’s Power hardware offers some obvious benefits, including improved processing speed and memory bandwidth, inherent security, and simpler deployment and management. But if you look beyond the impressive architecture, you’ll also find an open ecosystem that has given rise to a strong, innovative community, as well as an inventory of system and network management applications that really help leverage the benefits offered by running Linux on Power.Get the Guide