Book Excerpt: A Practical Guide to Fedora and Red Hat Enterprise Linux
The init Daemon
The init daemon is the system and service manager for Linux. It is the first true process Linux starts when it boots and as such, has a PID of 1 and is the ancestor of all processes. The init daemon has been around since the early days of UNIX, and many people have worked to improve it. The first Linux init daemon was based on the UNIX System V init daemon and is referred to as SysVinit (System V init daemon).
Because SysVinit does not deal well with modern hardware, including hotplug devices, USB hard and flash drives, and network-mounted filesystems, Fedora/RHEL recently replaced it with the Upstart init daemon (http://upstart.ubuntu.com/ and http://upstart.ubuntu.com/wiki). Fedora 15 has moved past Upstart to systemd init daemon, which is described next. Several other replacements for SysVinit are also available. One of the most prominent is initng (http://initng.sourceforge.net/trac). In addition, Solaris uses SMF (Service Management Facility), and MacOS uses launchd.
The systemd init Daemon (Fedora)
The name systemd comprises system, which systemd manages, followed by d. Under UNIX/Linux, daemon names frequently end in d: systemd is the system daemon. At boot time, systemd renames itself init, so you will not see a process named systemd. However, init is simply a link to systemd:
$ ls -l /sbin/init lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 14 04-22 08:47 /sbin/init -> ../bin/systemd
The name is also a play on words with System D, a reference to the French dérouillard (to untangle) or démerder. System D is a manner of responding to challenges that requires fast thinking, adapting, and improvising.
The systemd init daemon is a drop-in replacement for SysVinit; most of the administration tools that worked with SysVinit and Upstart work with systemd. Although systemd is new, most of the user interfaces pertinent to administrators will remain stable (http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/InterfaceStabilityPromise). A GUI to systemd is under development.
Use apropos to list man pages that pertain to systemd (apropos systemd). Some of the most interesting of these are systemd, systemctl, systemd.unit, and systemd.special.
systemd home page: http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd
Fedora systemd home page: fedoraproject.org/wiki/Systemd
Fedora systemd feature list: fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/systemd
SysVinit to systemd conversion notes: fedoraproject.org/wiki/SysVinit_to_Systemd_Cheatsheet
List of services that run natively under systemd: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Johannbg/QA/Systemd/compatability
Blog about systemd by its creator, Lennart Poettering: 0pointer.de/blog/projects/systemd.html
systemd stability promise: http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/InterfaceStabilityPromise
Service Units and Target Units
The systemd init daemon is based on the concept of units, each of which has a name and type. Typically information about a unit is stored in a file that has the same name as the unit (e.g., dbus.service). The types of units are service, socket, device, mount, automount, target, snapshot, timer, swap, and path. This section discusses service and target units, which are critical to controlling daemons and runlevel under systemd.
A service unit refers to a daemon (service) that systemd controls, including those controlled natively by systemd and those controlled by systemd via SysVinit scripts. For example, systemd controls the ntpd daemon natively via the ntpd.service service unit.
A target unit groups other units. Of concern in this section are targets that control the system runlevel. By default, Fedora activates graphical.target, which brings the system to a runlevel that equates to what was formerly called runlevel 5 (multiuser graphical mode). Activating multi-user.target brings the system to what was formerly called runlevel 3 (multiuser textual mode).
Terminology: server, service, daemon
A daemon, such as ntpd or cupsd, provides a service that runs on a server. The daemon itself is also sometimes referred to as a server. These three terms can be used interchangeably.
The systemd init daemon does not support runlevels the way SysVinit did. It supports target units, which parallel runlevels but are different. To ease the transition, this book continues to use the term runlevel to refer to target units. One difference between SysVinit runlevels and systemd target units is that the former can be changed only when the system changes runlevels while the latter can be activated by any of a large group of triggers. Another difference is that a systemd-based system can activate more than one target unit at a time, allowing the system to be in more than one runlevel at a time. For example, graphical.target pulls in multi-user.target so they are both active at the same time.
systemd runlevels differ from SysVinit runlevels - For consistency and clarity during the transition from SysVinit to systemd, this book refers to systemd target units as runlevels. Target units are not true runlevels, but they perform a function similar to the function performed by SysVinit runlevels.
Wants and Requires
Under systemd, the terms wants and requires specify units that are to be activated when the unit that wants or requires the other unit is activated. A unit that requires another unit will not start if the other unit is not available and will quit if the other unit becomes unavailable while the first unit is active. Wants is similar to requires, except a unit that wants another unit will not fail if the wanted unit is not available.
Fast/Flexible Linux OS Recovery
On Demand Now
In this live one-hour webinar, learn how to enhance your existing backup strategies for complete disaster recovery preparedness using Storix System Backup Administrator (SBAdmin), a highly flexible full-system recovery solution for UNIX and Linux systems.
Join Linux Journal's Shawn Powers and David Huffman, President/CEO, Storix, Inc.
Free to Linux Journal readers.Register Now!
- Download "Linux Management with Red Hat Satellite: Measuring Business Impact and ROI"
- Profiles and RC Files
- Git 2.9 Released
- Understanding Ceph and Its Place in the Market
- OpenSwitch Finds a New Home
- Astronomy for KDE
- Snappy Moves to New Platforms
- What's Our Next Fight?
- Maru OS Brings Debian to Your Phone
- SoftMaker FreeOffice
With all the industry talk about the benefits of Linux on Power and all the performance advantages offered by its open architecture, you may be considering a move in that direction. If you are thinking about analytics, big data and cloud computing, you would be right to evaluate Power. The idea of using commodity x86 hardware and replacing it every three years is an outdated cost model. It doesn’t consider the total cost of ownership, and it doesn’t consider the advantage of real processing power, high-availability and multithreading like a demon.
This ebook takes a look at some of the practical applications of the Linux on Power platform and ways you might bring all the performance power of this open architecture to bear for your organization. There are no smoke and mirrors here—just hard, cold, empirical evidence provided by independent sources. I also consider some innovative ways Linux on Power will be used in the future.Get the Guide