Book Excerpt: The Python Standard Library by Example
3.1.2 Comparison
Under Python 2, classes can define a __cmp__() method that returns -1, 0, or 1 based on whether the object is less than, equal to, or greater than the item being compared. Python 2.1 introduces the rich comparison methods API (__lt__(), __le__(), __eq__(), __ne__(), __gt__(), and __ge__()), which perform a single comparison operation and return a Boolean value. Python 3 deprecated __cmp__() in favor of these new methods, so functools provides tools to make it easier to write Python 2 classes that comply with the new comparison requirements in Python 3.
Rich Comparison
The rich comparison API is designed to allow classes with complex comparisons to implement each test in the most efficient way possible. However, for classes where comparison is relatively simple, there is no point in manually creating each of the rich comparison methods. The total_ordering() class decorator takes a class that provides some of the methods and adds the rest of them.
import functools
import inspect
from pprint import pprint
@functools.total_ordering
class MyObject(object):
def __init__(self, val):
self.val = val
def __eq__(self, other):
print ’ testing __eq__(%s, %s)’ % (self.val, other.val)
return self.val == other.val
def __gt__(self, other):
print ’ testing __gt__(%s, %s)’ % (self.val, other.val)
return self.val > other.val
print ’Methods:\n’
pprint(inspect.getmembers(MyObject, inspect.ismethod))
a = MyObject(1)
b = MyObject(2)
print ’\nComparisons:’
for expr in [ ’a < b’, ’a <= b’, ’a == b’, ’a >= b’, ’a > b’ ]:
print ’\n%-6s:’ % expr
result = eval(expr)
print ’ result of %s: <%s’ % (expr, result)
The class must provide implementation of __eq__() and one other rich comparison method. The decorator adds implementations of the rest of the methods that work by using the comparisons provided.
$ python functools_total_ordering.py Methods: [(’__eq__’, <unbound method MyObject.__eq__>), (’__ge__’, <unbound method MyObject.__ge__>), (’__gt__’, <unbound method MyObject.__gt__>), (’__init__’, <unbound method MyObject.__init__>), (’__le__’, <unbound method MyObject.__le__>), (’__lt__’, <unbound method MyObject.__lt__>)] Comparisons: a < b: testing __gt__(2, 1) result of a < b: True a <= b: testing __gt__(1, 2) result of a <= b: True a == b: testing __eq__(1, 2) result of a == b: False a >= b: testing __gt__(2, 1) result of a >= b: False a > b: testing __gt__(1, 2) result of a > b: False
Collation Order
Since old-style comparison functions are deprecated in Python 3, the cmp argument to functions like sort() is also no longer supported. Python 2 programs that use comparison functions can use cmp_to_key() to convert them to a function that returns a collation key, which is used to determine the position in the final sequence.
import functools
class MyObject(object):
def __init__(self, val):
self.val = val
def __str__(self):
return ’MyObject(%s)’ % self.val
def compare_obj(a, b):
"""Old-style comparison function.
"""
print ’comparing %s and %s’ % (a, b)
return cmp(a.val, b.val)
# Make a key function using cmp_to_key()
get_key = functools.cmp_to_key(compare_obj)
def get_key_wrapper(o):
"""Wrapper function for get_key to allow for print statements.
"""
new_key = get_key(o)
print ’key_wrapper(%s) -> %s’ % (o, new_key)
return new_key
objs = [ MyObject(x) for x in xrange(5, 0, -1) ]
for o in sorted(objs, key=get_key_wrapper):
print o Normally, cmp_to_key() would be used directly, but in this example, an extra wrapper function is introduced to print out more information as the key function is being called.
The output shows that sorted() starts by calling get_key_wrapper() for each item in the sequence to produce a key. The keys returned by cmp_to_key() are instances of a class defined in functools that implements the rich comparison API using the old-style comparison function passed in. After all keys are created, the sequence is sorted by comparing the keys.
$ python functools_cmp_to_key.py key_wrapper(MyObject(5)) -> <functools.K object at 0x100da2a50> key_wrapper(MyObject(4)) -> <functools.K object at 0x100da2a90> key_wrapper(MyObject(3)) -> <functools.K object at 0x100da2ad0> key_wrapper(MyObject(2)) -> <functools.K object at 0x100da2b10> key_wrapper(MyObject(1)) -> <functools.K object at 0x100da2b50> comparing MyObject(4) and MyObject(5) comparing MyObject(3) and MyObject(4) comparing MyObject(2) and MyObject(3) comparing MyObject(1) and MyObject(2) MyObject(1) MyObject(2) MyObject(3) MyObject(4) MyObject(5)
See Also:
functools (http://docs.python.org/library/functools.html) The standard library documentation for this module.
Rich comparison methods (http://docs.python.org/reference/datamodel.html# object.__lt__) Description of the rich comparison methods from the Python Reference Guide.
inspect (page 1200) Introspection API for live objects.
© Copyright Pearson Education. All rights reserved.
Excerpt from Python Standard Library by Example, The. |
|
| By Doug Hellmann Published by Addison-Wesley Professional ISBN-10: 0-321-76734-9 ISBN-13: 978-0-321-76734-9 |
|
This excerpt is from the book, ‘The Python Standard Library by Example’ by Doug Hellmann, published by Pearson/Addison-Wesley Professional, June 2011, ISBN 0321767349, Copyright 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. For more info please visit www.informit.com/title/0321767349
- « first
- ‹ previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
Today’s modular x86 servers are compute-centric, designed as a least common denominator to support a wide range of IT workloads. Those generic, virtualized IT workloads have much different resource optimization requirements than hyperscale and cloud applications. They have resulted in a “one size fits all” enterprise IT architecture that is not optimized for a specific set of IT workloads, and especially not emerging hyperscale workloads, such as web applications, big data, and object storage. In this report, you will learn how shifting the focus from traditional compute-centric IT architectures to an innovative disaggregated fabric-based architecture can optimize and scale your data center.
Sponsored by AMD
Built-in forensics, incident response, and security with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Every security policy provides guidance and requirements for ensuring adequate protection of information and data, as well as high-level technical and administrative security requirements for a system in a given environment. Traditionally, providing security for a system focuses on the confidentiality of the information on it. However, protecting the data integrity and system and data availability is just as important. For example, when processing United States intelligence information, there are three attributes that require protection: confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
Learn more about catching the bad guy in this free white paper.
Sponsored by DLT Solutions
| Making Linux and Android Get Along (It's Not as Hard as It Sounds) | May 16, 2013 |
| Drupal Is a Framework: Why Everyone Needs to Understand This | May 15, 2013 |
| Home, My Backup Data Center | May 13, 2013 |
| Non-Linux FOSS: Seashore | May 10, 2013 |
| Trying to Tame the Tablet | May 08, 2013 |
| Dart: a New Web Programming Experience | May 07, 2013 |
- RSS Feeds
- New Products
- Making Linux and Android Get Along (It's Not as Hard as It Sounds)
- A Topic for Discussion - Open Source Feature-Richness?
- Drupal Is a Framework: Why Everyone Needs to Understand This
- Home, My Backup Data Center
- New Products
- Paranoid Penguin - Building a Secure Squid Web Proxy, Part IV
- Developer Poll
- Trying to Tame the Tablet
Enter to Win an Adafruit Prototyping Pi Plate Kit for Raspberry Pi

It's Raspberry Pi month at Linux Journal. Each week in May, Adafruit will be giving away a Pi-related prize to a lucky, randomly drawn LJ reader. Winners will be announced weekly.
Fill out the fields below to enter to win this week's prize-- a Prototyping Pi Plate Kit for Raspberry Pi.
Congratulations to our winners so far:
- 5-8-13, Pi Starter Pack: Jack Davis
- 5-15-13, Pi Model B 512MB RAM: Patrick Dunn
- Next winner announced on 5-21-13!
Free Webinar: Linux Backup and Recovery
Most companies incorporate backup procedures for critical data, which can be restored quickly if a loss occurs. However, fewer companies are prepared for catastrophic system failures, in which they lose all data, the entire operating system, applications, settings, patches and more, reducing their system(s) to “bare metal.” After all, before data can be restored to a system, there must be a system to restore it to.
In this one hour webinar, learn how to enhance your existing backup strategies for better disaster recovery preparedness using Storix System Backup Administrator (SBAdmin), a highly flexible bare-metal recovery solution for UNIX and Linux systems.



3 hours 52 min ago
6 hours 25 min ago
11 hours 4 min ago
13 hours 27 min ago
1 day 6 hours ago
1 day 8 hours ago
1 day 10 hours ago
1 day 10 hours ago
1 day 11 hours ago
1 day 15 hours ago