Bash Quoting
Quoting things in bash is quite simple... until it isn't. I've written scripts where I'd swear 90% of the effort was getting bash to quote things correctly.
The basics of quoting are simple, use single or double quotes when a value contains spaces:
a="hello world"
a='hello world'
But single and double quotes are different. Single quotes don't support any kind of variable substitution or escaping of special characters inside the quoted string. Double quotes, on the other hand, support both:
a="hello \"there\" world"
a='hello "there" world'
a='hello \'there\' world' # causes an error
a="hello 'there' world"
b="there"
a='hello \"$b\" world' # a is >>hello \"$b\" world
a="hello \"$b\" world" # a is >>hello "there" world
One way around the problem that single quotes don't support variable substitution is to quote the individual literal parts of the string and then put the variable substitutions between them:
b='"there"'
a='"hello" '$b' "world"' # a is: >>"hello" "there" "world"<<
Note that "$b" is not actually inside a quoted part of the string. Since there's no space between the two literal parts of the string and the "$b", bash puts the final result into a single string and then assigns it to a.
One place where quoting problems often occur is when you're dealing with files that have spaces in their names. For example, if we have a file named "file with spaces" and we run the following script:
#/bin/bash
for i in $(find .)
do
echo $i
done
We don't get what we want:
$ bash t1.sh
.
./file
with
spaces
./t2.sh
./t1.sh
...
One solution is to put the file names into a bash array when the Internal Field Separator is set to just a newline. Then we use the value "${array[@]}" as the list for the for loop.
#/bin/bash
newline='
'
OIFS=$IFS
IFS=$newline
files=($(find .))
IFS=$OIFS
for i in "${files[@]}"
do
echo $i
done
This produces the correct output:
$ bash t2.sh
.
./file with spaces
./t2.sh
./t1.sh
...
The difference between "${array[*]}" and "${array[@]}" is analagous to the difference between "$*" and "$@", namely that in the later case the result is that each word becomes separately quoted rather than the entire thing being quoted as a single string.
Another option, which avoids special quoting is to just set the Internal Field Separator variable before the for loop runs and reset it as the first statement in the loop body:
#/bin/bash
newline='
'
OIFS=$IFS
IFS=$newline
for i in $(find .)
do
IFS=$OIFS
echo $i
done
Another quoting problem is when you have a string which you'd like to break up into separate words but you'd also like to honor any quoted substrings in the string. Consider the string:
a="hello \"there big\" world"
and suppose you'd like to break that into its three parts:
- hello
- there big
- world
If you run this:
#!/bin/bash
a="hello \"there big\" world"
for i in $a
do
echo $i
done
It produces this:
$ bash t4.sh
hello
"there
big"
world
The trick here is to use a special form of the set command to reset $* (and therefore, $1, $2, etc). My first version is always like this:
#!/bin/bash
a="hello \"there big\" world"
set -- $a
for i in "$@"
do
echo $i
done
And of course it doesn't work:
$ bash t5.sh
hello
"there
big"
world
Then I usually remember you have to eval the set statement:
#!/bin/bash
a="hello \"there big\" world"
eval set -- $a
for i in "$@"
do
echo $i
done
At which point it works:
$ bash t6.sh
hello
there big
world
at this point I'm usually tired of quoting things.
Mitch Frazier is an Associate Editor for Linux Journal.
Today’s modular x86 servers are compute-centric, designed as a least common denominator to support a wide range of IT workloads. Those generic, virtualized IT workloads have much different resource optimization requirements than hyperscale and cloud applications. They have resulted in a “one size fits all” enterprise IT architecture that is not optimized for a specific set of IT workloads, and especially not emerging hyperscale workloads, such as web applications, big data, and object storage. In this report, you will learn how shifting the focus from traditional compute-centric IT architectures to an innovative disaggregated fabric-based architecture can optimize and scale your data center.
Sponsored by AMD
Built-in forensics, incident response, and security with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Every security policy provides guidance and requirements for ensuring adequate protection of information and data, as well as high-level technical and administrative security requirements for a system in a given environment. Traditionally, providing security for a system focuses on the confidentiality of the information on it. However, protecting the data integrity and system and data availability is just as important. For example, when processing United States intelligence information, there are three attributes that require protection: confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
Learn more about catching the bad guy in this free white paper.
Sponsored by DLT Solutions
| Making Linux and Android Get Along (It's Not as Hard as It Sounds) | May 16, 2013 |
| Drupal Is a Framework: Why Everyone Needs to Understand This | May 15, 2013 |
| Home, My Backup Data Center | May 13, 2013 |
| Non-Linux FOSS: Seashore | May 10, 2013 |
| Trying to Tame the Tablet | May 08, 2013 |
| Dart: a New Web Programming Experience | May 07, 2013 |
- New Products
- Making Linux and Android Get Along (It's Not as Hard as It Sounds)
- A Topic for Discussion - Open Source Feature-Richness?
- Drupal Is a Framework: Why Everyone Needs to Understand This
- Readers' Choice Awards
- Home, My Backup Data Center
- What's the tweeting protocol?
- New Products
- RSS Feeds
- One Hand Slapping
- Reply to comment | Linux Journal
7 hours 40 min ago - Reply to comment | Linux Journal
10 hours 12 min ago - Reply to comment | Linux Journal
11 hours 29 min ago - great post
12 hours 4 min ago - Google Docs
12 hours 27 min ago - Reply to comment | Linux Journal
17 hours 15 min ago - Reply to comment | Linux Journal
18 hours 2 min ago - Web Hosting IQ
19 hours 36 min ago - Thanks for taking the time to
21 hours 13 min ago - Linux is good
23 hours 10 min ago
Enter to Win an Adafruit Prototyping Pi Plate Kit for Raspberry Pi

It's Raspberry Pi month at Linux Journal. Each week in May, Adafruit will be giving away a Pi-related prize to a lucky, randomly drawn LJ reader. Winners will be announced weekly.
Fill out the fields below to enter to win this week's prize-- a Prototyping Pi Plate Kit for Raspberry Pi.
Congratulations to our winners so far:
- 5-8-13, Pi Starter Pack: Jack Davis
- 5-15-13, Pi Model B 512MB RAM: Patrick Dunn
- Next winner announced on 5-21-13!
Free Webinar: Linux Backup and Recovery
Most companies incorporate backup procedures for critical data, which can be restored quickly if a loss occurs. However, fewer companies are prepared for catastrophic system failures, in which they lose all data, the entire operating system, applications, settings, patches and more, reducing their system(s) to “bare metal.” After all, before data can be restored to a system, there must be a system to restore it to.
In this one hour webinar, learn how to enhance your existing backup strategies for better disaster recovery preparedness using Storix System Backup Administrator (SBAdmin), a highly flexible bare-metal recovery solution for UNIX and Linux systems.



Comments
When there are too long or too many filenames
Very interesting! I always forget $@ and eval. Regarding filenames, I prefer while/read to avoid the case of extra long or too many filenames (because * expands to the full list!):
This way I have the full filename in a variable without too much hassle. To process only the current directory, I add -maxdepth 1 to the find command.
There is a problem with this approach: FILE is only valid inside the while loop, because is run as a separate bash process (Eats some memory, but is slightly faster). When the input comes from a file, we can do this to avoid the extra process:
Regards,
Fjor
This is sweet. I've been
This is sweet. I've been looking for a over an hour for a way to treat quoted strings with spaces in them as a single token; many articles I have read come close but none hit the nail on the head like yours did. The magic is all in the "eval set..." Thanks so much!
IFS
In bash it is possible to specify the field separator using control characters. The "newline" var in the above examples can be written as:
newline=$'\n'
which is more readable.
Yes it is
Thanks, I didn't know that. I see it now in the man page.
Mitch Frazier is an Associate Editor for Linux Journal.
This is madness
Does anyone know of a shell without all this quoting complications?
Or do I have to stick to Python and Ruby?
In the
In the program
#/bin/bash
newline='
'
OIFS=$IFS
IFS=$newline
for i in $(find .)
do
IFS=$OIFS
echo $i
done
why we need IFS=$OIFS in the loop?
Can't we write this once after loop?
IFS
In this simple case, yes you could put IFS=$OIFS outside the loop, but that might not always be the case if other parts of the loop expect a "normal" IFS value. This example is a bit contrived, but suppose the loop looked like this:
for i in $(find .) do for j in $(echo a b c) do echo $j done echo $i doneHere the variable j only takes on one value, "a b c", because IFS contains only newline, and not tab or space.
Mitch Frazier is an Associate Editor for Linux Journal.
Quoting is fine but why not
Quoting is fine but why not use python instead?
Can you elaborate on the
Can you elaborate on the Python advantage? Not familiar w/ it.
Thanks!
Ouch, brain hurts. Funny you
Ouch, brain hurts.
Funny you should bring this up - I was struggling with a super-stupid-simple issue this week that didn't work because of quoting. Thanks for the article!
What about files passed on the command line?
Thanks very much for the IFS tip. That seems a good way around this problem.
However, what about passing in filenames on the command line? I'd like to call my script as so:
$ script "file 1 with spaces" "file 2 with spaces"
.. and be able to parse them correctly. Suggestions?
Use "$@"
Something like this should work:
for i in "$@" do echo "$i" doneThe secret is with quoting $@, rather than getting all the command line arguments quoted as a single string (which is what "$*" gets you), when you use "$@" you get each individual argument separately quoted, and if you quoted things on the command line they will continue to be quoted. When I say quoted, I really mean it keeps them together as you specified them and doesn't break them at spaces.
Mitch Frazier is an Associate Editor for Linux Journal.
Doh! Thanks!
Wow! All this time I've been misusing $* and $@. I've tried various combinations of quoting $@, $*, $1, and $i (in a for loop), and I'd never gotten this to work right before now. Thanks so much!
I finally have a way to quickly, quietly, reliably unzip a bunch of zip files with spaces in their names, from the command line.
Thanks.
Re: Use "$@"
The following is slightly simpler and does the same thing:
for i do echo "$i" doneWith no in, the for just iterates over all the positional parameters.
Very useful article! I have
Very useful article! I have run into these issues too and I these tips help a lot.