Bash Extended Globbing
Wildcards in bash are referred to as pathname expansion. Pathname expansion is also sometimes referred to as globbing. Pathname expansion "expands" the "*", "?", and "[...]" syntaxes when you type them as part of a command, for example:
$ ls *.jpg # List all JPEG files $ ls ?.jpg # List JPEG files with 1 char names (eg a.jpg, 1.jpg) $ rm [A-Z]*.jpg # Remove JPEG files that start with a capital letterA subtle point about pathname expansion that is not often understood is that it is done by bash and not by the operating system or by the program that is being run. The program never sees the wildcards, bash substitutes the expansion into the command line before running the program. This is rarely important except when you're writing code and calling exec() and friends: if you don't execute the program via bash any wildcards in the command line that you pass to exec() won't get expanded.
But these are not the only forms of wildcards supported by bash. The other forms are referred to as extended globbing and you must enable them before you can use them:
$ shopt -s extglobExtended globbing as described by the bash man page:
?(pattern-list) Matches zero or one occurrence of the given patterns *(pattern-list) Matches zero or more occurrences of the given patterns +(pattern-list) Matches one or more occurrences of the given patterns @(pattern-list) Matches one of the given patterns !(pattern-list) Matches anything except one of the given patternsHere a pattern-list is a list of items separated by a vertical bar "|" (aka the pipe symbol). If you look at these you can see why the leading character was chosen as it matches what is used in regular expression syntax:
Bash Regular Expression ?(pattern-list) (...|...)? *(pattern-list) (...|...)* +(pattern-list) (...|...)+ @(pattern-list) (...|...) [@ not a RE syntax] !(pattern-list) "!" used as for negative assertions in RE syntaxWell, except for the "@" character you can see why...
For example, to list all the JPEG and GIF files that start with either "ab" or "def" you could do:
$ ls +(ab|def)*+(.jpg|.gif)Of course you could also do this without extended globbing:
# ls ab*.jpg ab*.gif def*.jpg def*.gif
To list all the files that match the regular expression "ab(2|3)+.jpg" you could do:
$ ls ab+(2|3).jpgNow that's something you can't do with regular globbing. Note: this matches files like ab2.jpg, ab3.jpg, ab2222.jpg, ab333.jpg, etc.
However, probably the most interesting extended globbing syntax is the "!(...)" syntax for matching everything except (ie not matching). But, be careful, this doesn't always do what you might expect. For example, let's list all the files that aren't JPEGs or GIFs. One's first thought might be something like this:
$ ls *!(.jpg|.gif) # wrong, Wrong, WRONGBut that doesn't work because the ".jpg" and the ".gif" of any file's name end up getting matched by the "*" and the null string at the end of the file name is the part that ends up not matching the "!(...)" pattern. The correct syntax is:
$ ls !(*.jpg|*.gif)
For a more complex negation example, let's go back to the first example and list all the files that aren't JPEG or GIF files and start with either "ab" or "def". This is actually quite simple, we just take the first example and nest it inside of "!(...)":
$ ls !(+(ab|def)*+(.jpg|.gif))Of course, like complex regular expressions, this will be completely incomprehensible 10 minutes after you write it.
Mitch Frazier is an Associate Editor for Linux Journal.
Today’s modular x86 servers are compute-centric, designed as a least common denominator to support a wide range of IT workloads. Those generic, virtualized IT workloads have much different resource optimization requirements than hyperscale and cloud applications. They have resulted in a “one size fits all” enterprise IT architecture that is not optimized for a specific set of IT workloads, and especially not emerging hyperscale workloads, such as web applications, big data, and object storage. In this report, you will learn how shifting the focus from traditional compute-centric IT architectures to an innovative disaggregated fabric-based architecture can optimize and scale your data center.
Sponsored by AMD
Built-in forensics, incident response, and security with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Every security policy provides guidance and requirements for ensuring adequate protection of information and data, as well as high-level technical and administrative security requirements for a system in a given environment. Traditionally, providing security for a system focuses on the confidentiality of the information on it. However, protecting the data integrity and system and data availability is just as important. For example, when processing United States intelligence information, there are three attributes that require protection: confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
Learn more about catching the bad guy in this free white paper.
Sponsored by DLT Solutions
| Making Linux and Android Get Along (It's Not as Hard as It Sounds) | May 16, 2013 |
| Drupal Is a Framework: Why Everyone Needs to Understand This | May 15, 2013 |
| Home, My Backup Data Center | May 13, 2013 |
| Non-Linux FOSS: Seashore | May 10, 2013 |
| Trying to Tame the Tablet | May 08, 2013 |
| Dart: a New Web Programming Experience | May 07, 2013 |
- RSS Feeds
- New Products
- Making Linux and Android Get Along (It's Not as Hard as It Sounds)
- Drupal Is a Framework: Why Everyone Needs to Understand This
- Home, My Backup Data Center
- A Topic for Discussion - Open Source Feature-Richness?
- Developer Poll
- Dart: a New Web Programming Experience
- May 2013 Issue of Linux Journal: Raspberry Pi
- What's the tweeting protocol?
- Reply to comment | Linux Journal
2 hours 32 min ago - Reply to comment | Linux Journal
3 hours 19 min ago - Web Hosting IQ
4 hours 53 min ago - Thanks for taking the time to
6 hours 30 min ago - Linux is good
8 hours 27 min ago - Reply to comment | Linux Journal
8 hours 45 min ago - Web Hosting IQ
9 hours 15 min ago - Web Hosting IQ
9 hours 15 min ago - Web Hosting IQ
9 hours 16 min ago - Reply to comment | Linux Journal
12 hours 16 min ago
Enter to Win an Adafruit Prototyping Pi Plate Kit for Raspberry Pi

It's Raspberry Pi month at Linux Journal. Each week in May, Adafruit will be giving away a Pi-related prize to a lucky, randomly drawn LJ reader. Winners will be announced weekly.
Fill out the fields below to enter to win this week's prize-- a Prototyping Pi Plate Kit for Raspberry Pi.
Congratulations to our winners so far:
- 5-8-13, Pi Starter Pack: Jack Davis
- 5-15-13, Pi Model B 512MB RAM: Patrick Dunn
- Next winner announced on 5-21-13!
Free Webinar: Linux Backup and Recovery
Most companies incorporate backup procedures for critical data, which can be restored quickly if a loss occurs. However, fewer companies are prepared for catastrophic system failures, in which they lose all data, the entire operating system, applications, settings, patches and more, reducing their system(s) to “bare metal.” After all, before data can be restored to a system, there must be a system to restore it to.
In this one hour webinar, learn how to enhance your existing backup strategies for better disaster recovery preparedness using Storix System Backup Administrator (SBAdmin), a highly flexible bare-metal recovery solution for UNIX and Linux systems.



Comments
Dangerous example for rm
In bash,
$ rm [A-Z]*.jpg # Remove JPEG files that start with a capital letterremoves [a-y]*.jpg files too if LANG is set to en_US! The z*.jpg files are ignored, because the collation order is AaBb..Zz. Bash documents that they'll use the collation order. Personally, I think they need to recognize that sorting for people and sorting for computers is different, and that upper case and lower ranges should always be separate for globbing. Admins are coding for computers, not people.
Not quite
Actually, on my machine the order seems to be aAbB...zZ.
#~/mytest> ls [a-z]*
a A b B z
#~/mytest> ls [A-Z]*
A b B z Z
rm command's dangers
A similar discussion is found here. Here, filenames having space in them, are not handled properly.
Same Results
I could get the same result with :
(which I think it's much convenient / much easier to write)
- ls -alt [a-z]*.{jpg,gif}
- ls -alt [a-z]?.{jpg,gif}
- ls -alt t{[0-9]*,[a-z]*}.{jpg,gif}
hope this helps
Not really
This:
ls -alt [a-z]*.{jpg,gif}lists jpg/gif files that start with any lower case letter followed by any number of other characters.
This:
ls -alt [a-z]?.{jpg,gif}lists jpg/gif files start with any lower case letter followed by any single character.
This:
ls -alt t{[0-9]*,[a-z]*}.{jpg,gif}lists jpg/gif files that start with the letter t followed by either a digit or a lower case letter and then followed by any number of other characters.
Although the first two will list files that start with "ab" or "def", they also list many other files. Not even sure what your last example is meant to compare to since I don't have any examples that list files starting with the letter t.
The point of the examples is not to show the "simplest" way to perform the examples themselves, but rather to illustrate extended globbing.
Mitch Frazier is an Associate Editor for Linux Journal.
similar effect with another trick
That:
$ ls +(ab|def)*+(.jpg|.gif)
can be done in bash NOT with:
$ ls ab*.jpg ab*.gif def*.jpg def*.gif
but more effieciently with:
$ ls {ab,def}*.{jpg,gif}
Though you missed the point. 1st syntax is different from 2nd (and 3rd) in that in 2nd and 3rd cases "ls" would complain if some of the patterns are not found. (e.g. "ab*.jpg" not found) while in first case bash would properly expand the expression listing only matching files.
Only if you squint
True, they do behave differently if there are no matching files. And yes the "syntax" is different since they are written differently, what you probably mean is that the "semantics" are different because they do not act the same if the expansion fails. So, when I stated Of course you could also do this without extended globbing, it was not my intention to imply that the two forms were exactly the same in all instances. The point here was to illustrate how to use extended globbing and not to provide a comparison between the different ways to list jpg/gif files that start with "ab" or "def".
Mitch Frazier is an Associate Editor for Linux Journal.