Bash Arrays
If you're used to a "standard" *NIX shell you may not be familiar with bash's array feature. Although not as powerful as similar constructs in the P languages (Perl, Python, and PHP) and others, they are often quite useful.
Bash arrays have numbered indexes only, but they are sparse, ie you don't have to define all the indexes. An entire array can be assigned by enclosing the array items in parenthesis:
arr=(Hello World)Individual items can be assigned with the familiar array syntax (unless you're used to Basic or Fortran):
arr[0]=Hello arr[1]=WorldBut it gets a bit ugly when you want to refer to an array item:
echo ${arr[0]} ${arr[1]}
To quote from the man page:
The braces are required to avoid conflicts with pathname expansion.
In addition the following funky constructs are available:
${arr[*]} # All of the items in the array
${!arr[*]} # All of the indexes in the array
${#arr[*]} # Number of items in the array
${#arr[0]} # Length of item zero
The ${!arr[*]} is a relatively new addition to bash,
it was not part of the original array implementation.
The following example shows some simple array usage (note the "[index]=value" assignment to assign a specific index):
#!/bin/bash
array=(one two three four [5]=five)
echo "Array size: ${#array[*]}"
echo "Array items:"
for item in ${array[*]}
do
printf " %s\n" $item
done
echo "Array indexes:"
for index in ${!array[*]}
do
printf " %d\n" $index
done
echo "Array items and indexes:"
for index in ${!array[*]}
do
printf "%4d: %s\n" $index ${array[$index]}
done
Array size: 5 Array items: one two three four five Array indexes: 0 1 2 3 5 Array items and indexes: 0: one 1: two 2: three 3: four 5: five
Note that the "@" sign can be used instead of the "*" in constructs such as ${arr[*]}, the result is the same except when expanding to the items of the array within a quoted string. In this case the behavior is the same as when expanding "$*" and "$@" within quoted strings: "${arr[*]}" returns all the items as a single word, whereas "${arr[@]}" returns each item as a separate word.
The following example shows how unquoted, quoted "*", and quoted "@" affect the expansion (particularly important when the array items themselves contain spaces):
#!/bin/bash
array=("first item" "second item" "third" "item")
echo "Number of items in original array: ${#array[*]}"
for ix in ${!array[*]}
do
printf " %s\n" "${array[$ix]}"
done
echo
arr=(${array[*]})
echo "After unquoted expansion: ${#arr[*]}"
for ix in ${!arr[*]}
do
printf " %s\n" "${arr[$ix]}"
done
echo
arr=("${array[*]}")
echo "After * quoted expansion: ${#arr[*]}"
for ix in ${!arr[*]}
do
printf " %s\n" "${arr[$ix]}"
done
echo
arr=("${array[@]}")
echo "After @ quoted expansion: ${#arr[*]}"
for ix in ${!arr[*]}
do
printf " %s\n" "${arr[$ix]}"
done
Number of items in original array: 4 first item second item third item After unquoted expansion: 6 first item second item third item After * quoted expansion: 1 first item second item third item After @ quoted expansion: 4 first item second item third item
Mitch Frazier is an Associate Editor for Linux Journal.
Realizing the promise of Apache® Hadoop® requires the effective deployment of compute, memory, storage and networking to achieve optimal results. With its flexibility and multitude of options, it is easy to over or under provision the server infrastructure, resulting in poor performance and high TCO. Join us for an in depth, technical discussion with industry experts from leading Hadoop and server companies who will provide insights into the key considerations for designing and deploying an optimal Hadoop cluster.
Sponsored by AMD
If you already use virtualized infrastructure, you are well on your way to leveraging the power of the cloud. Virtualization offers the promise of limitless resources, but how do you manage that scalability when your DevOps team doesn’t scale? In today’s hypercompetitive markets, fast results can make a difference between leading the pack vs. obsolescence. Organizations need more benefits from cloud computing than just raw resources. They need agility, flexibility, convenience, ROI, and control.
Stackato private Platform-as-a-Service technology from ActiveState extends your private cloud infrastructure by creating a private PaaS to provide on-demand availability, flexibility, control, and ultimately, faster time-to-market for your enterprise.
Sponsored by ActiveState
| Speed Up Your Web Site with Varnish | Jun 19, 2013 |
| Non-Linux FOSS: libnotify, OS X Style | Jun 18, 2013 |
| Containers—Not Virtual Machines—Are the Future Cloud | Jun 17, 2013 |
| Lock-Free Multi-Producer Multi-Consumer Queue on Ring Buffer | Jun 12, 2013 |
| Weechat, Irssi's Little Brother | Jun 11, 2013 |
| One Tail Just Isn't Enough | Jun 07, 2013 |
- Speed Up Your Web Site with Varnish
- Containers—Not Virtual Machines—Are the Future Cloud
- Linux Systems Administrator
- Lock-Free Multi-Producer Multi-Consumer Queue on Ring Buffer
- Senior Perl Developer
- Technical Support Rep
- RSS Feeds
- Non-Linux FOSS: libnotify, OS X Style
- UX Designer
- Web & UI Developer (JavaScript & j Query)
- So when they found it hard to
57 min 25 sec ago - yea
1 hour 19 min ago - Reply to comment | Linux Journal
1 hour 41 min ago - Android has been dominating
1 hour 46 min ago - It is quiet helping
4 hours 32 min ago - Technology
4 hours 49 min ago - Reachli - Amplifying your
6 hours 5 min ago - excellent
6 hours 54 min ago - good point!
6 hours 57 min ago - Varnish works!
7 hours 6 min ago
Featured Jobs
| Linux Systems Administrator | Houston and Austin, Texas | Host Gator |
| Senior Perl Developer | Austin, Texas | Host Gator |
| Technical Support Rep | Houston and Austin, Texas | Host Gator |
| UX Designer | Austin, Texas | Host Gator |
| Web & UI Developer (JavaScript & j Query) | Austin, Texas | Host Gator |
Free Webinar: Hadoop
How to Build an Optimal Hadoop Cluster to Store and Maintain Unlimited Amounts of Data Using Microservers
Realizing the promise of Apache® Hadoop® requires the effective deployment of compute, memory, storage and networking to achieve optimal results. With its flexibility and multitude of options, it is easy to over or under provision the server infrastructure, resulting in poor performance and high TCO. Join us for an in depth, technical discussion with industry experts from leading Hadoop and server companies who will provide insights into the key considerations for designing and deploying an optimal Hadoop cluster.
Some of key questions to be discussed are:
- What is the “typical” Hadoop cluster and what should be installed on the different machine types?
- Why should you consider the typical workload patterns when making your hardware decisions?
- Are all microservers created equal for Hadoop deployments?
- How do I plan for expansion if I require more compute, memory, storage or networking?



Comments
Script fails?
The example script fails on my Solaris 9 server using GNU Bash-2.05. Of course you do mention that the ${!array[*]} is fairly new so it appears not to be in my version of bash. Posting what version you are using would be helpful.
Here's the output I got.
#
Array size: 5
Array items:
one
two
three
four
five
Array indexes:
Array items and indexes:
Thanks!
SQLITE
Hello,
Thanks for this article, Using bash arrays is MUST to avoid using tmp files and unnessary loops in some cases ...
But for large amount of data, I'd highly recommend using sqlite databases which is much faster and allows better functions ...
Think big
When I have a lot of data to store I use a Sun Fire X4500 server with 48 Terabytes of attached storage. What I like most about this is that it's a one to one swap for using bash.
Geez...
Mitch Frazier is an Associate Editor for Linux Journal.
Array in bash is really
Array in bash is really helpful. Here is how we can join two arrays in bash
http://unstableme.blogspot.com/2008/12/join-two-arrays-in-bash-script.html
what about speed
hmm, I've tried once to use bash arrays in a simple script, which looked for specified strings in all cvs revisions of a file. But it seemed to work rather slowly.
Trolls
So he tried it "ONCE" and decided it was slow? Hmmmm...
Pretty weak
Since you don't really give us any details to support your assertion: no source for your script and no details of other bash based implementations that proved faster, I have to assume that the slowness was related to CVS, or to searching, or possibly to bash in general, but I doubt it had anything do with bash arrays.
Mitch Frazier is an Associate Editor for Linux Journal.
speed
That's clearly just a troll. Bash is useful and the author doesn't need to justify its relevance. :D