bad udp check sum on traceroute from box w/ NAT
OK, so here's a fun one.
I've been trying to troubleshoot a very odd traceroute/udp issue I'm seeing that I can't figure out.
I have two gateway/firewall boxes running NAT for internal hosts on two different networks (office1 and office2).
one is running 2.6.22-gentoo-r9, lets call this one gw1
the other 2.6.20-gentoo-r8, lets call this one gw2
Theres two other systems here:
a system inside either of these two lans, we'll call it lan_host1
a system out on the internet not behind nat, we'll call it outside1
From lan_host1 which is behind either gw1 or gw2 I can traceroute out fine. I can hit gw1 or gw2 from inside the opposites network, i can hit any other host on the internet ( including outside1 ).
From outside1 I can traceroute to both gw1 and gw2 no problem.
Whenever I try to traceroute from either gw1 or gw2 to any host on the internet, including each other and/or outside1, it eventually times out and fails. Running tcpdump on both hosts at the same time while doing the traceroute shows the same UDP packets at both ends, and I know that both hosts respond to traceroute otherwise. What is interesting is what tcpdump shows ( on both hosts ) of the packets in question:
$ tcpdump -nnvvS
tcpdump: listening on eth0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 68 bytes
14:31:29.322429 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 1, id 53536, offset 0, flags [none], proto: UDP (17), length: 46) gw1.53493 > gw2.33477: [bad udp cksum a015!] UDP, length 18
Both sides will see this exact same packet, so I know no other modifications to the packet are happening. Both sides show the bad udp cksum error. In IPTABLES I have the following rules:
$IPTABLES -A INPUT -m state --state INVALID -j DROP
$IPTABLES -A FORWARD -m state --state INVALID -j DROP
$IPTABLES -A OUTPUT -m state --state INVALID -j REJECT
If I do the following I can watch live the iptables counters:
$ watch 'iptables -nv -L | grep INVALID' (shows the following)
18 780 DROP all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state INVALID
0 0 DROP all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state INVALID
0 0 REJECT all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state INVALID reject-with icmp-port-unreachable
Now with every attempt at the traceroute to the destined host the INVALID counters on the INPUT table increase. So I try removing that line for INPUT and not DROP'ing any of my INVALID data, but still no reply goes back to the original host. I am guessing that the kernel still drops the packet because the UDP check sum is incorrect. tcpdump will show zero reply to these traceroute attempts. I have even tried to traceroute to other networking gear including my ISPs upstream Cisco cores, and they too drop these UDP packets ( although I have not contacted them to confirm/ask their thoughts, I just know traceroute fails).
Things I can rule out:
1. non-NAT related iptables rules. outside1 runs almost the exact same rule set minus NAT related statements and forwarding.
2. ISPs blocking traceroute udp packets. I can clearly traceroute from other hosts, or from inside those networks to the opposite one.
3. hardware. all my servers use Intel cards, if it was hardware I believe I'd see a lot more issues with udp packets, etc.
Oh, a traceroute -I (for icmp) works fine.
Googling this issue in every way that I can think of returns nothing. Both boxes, with different Kernels, creating the same packets that have bad check sums. Could be something with my NAT setup, but I don't do anything that crazy with it.
Thoughts? Any help, greatly greatly appreciated. I'd also be happy to provide more info if I can.
- a stressed sys-admin.
I cross posted this in the Gentoo forums as well: http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-732185.html
Getting Started with DevOps - Including New Data on IT Performance from Puppet Labs 2015 State of DevOps Report
August 27, 2015
12:00 PM CDT
DevOps represents a profound change from the way most IT departments have traditionally worked: from siloed teams and high-anxiety releases to everyone collaborating on uneventful and more frequent releases of higher-quality code. It doesn't matter how large or small an organization is, or even whether it's historically slow moving or risk averse — there are ways to adopt DevOps sanely, and get measurable results in just weeks.
Free to Linux Journal readers.Register Now!
- Hacking a Safe with Bash
- Django Models and Migrations
- Secure Server Deployments in Hostile Territory, Part II
- Huge Package Overhaul for Debian and Ubuntu
- Home Automation with Raspberry Pi
- The Controversy Behind Canonical's Intellectual Property Policy
- Shashlik - a Tasty New Android Simulator
- Embed Linux in Monitoring and Control Systems
- KDE Reveals Plasma Mobile
- diff -u: What's New in Kernel Development