Work the Shell - Solve: a Command-Line Calculator Redux

 in
Dave completes his explanation of writing a helpful interactive command-line calculator as a shell script.

Ooops! Two months ago, I started exploring how you can write a simple but quite helpful interactive command-line calculator as a shell script and ended the column with “Next month, we'll dig into useful refinements and make it a full-blown addition to our Linux toolkit. See you then!”

Unfortunately, last month, I got sidetracked with the movie The Number 23 and started another script looking at how to do numerology within the shell scripting environment. You'd think I was a typical programmer or something, being sidetracked and losing a thread by picking up another one. It reminds me of those glorious startup days from the late 1990s too, but that's an entirely different story.

Anyway, numerology can wait another month. This column, I'd like to complete the command-line calculator because, well, because it's so darn useful and simultaneously astonishing that there isn't a decent command-line calculator in Linux after all these years. I mean, really!

When Last We Met

It was a while back, so let me remind you that the wicked short script to give you the rudimentary calculator is this:


#!/bin/sh

bc << EOF
scale=4
$@
quit
EOF

That's it. Name it solve.sh, for example, and you can test it, as shown here:

$ sh solve.sh 1+3
4
$ sh solve.sh 11/7
1.5714

It's easy enough to alias solve to the shell command too:

alias solve="sh solve.sh"

Or, better:

alias solve="sh ~/bin/solve.sh"

As that'll work regardless of where you are in the filesystem (location-dependent commands are a typical shell gaffe).

What I'd really like, however, is to be able to go into a “solve” mode where anything I type automatically is assumed to be a mathematical equation, rather than have to type solve each time.

Rapping about Wrappers

We've talked about shell script wrappers in the past, so you should recall this basic structure:

while read userinput
do
  echo "you entered $userinput"
done

That's too crude to use as of yet, but we easily can add a prompt so that it looks like a real program:

echo -n "solve"
while read expression
do
  echo "you entered $expression"
  echo -n "solve: "
done

Look good? Actually, it's not. There's a subtle error here, one that's another common scripting mistake. The problem is that there are two echo commands in Linux: one that's the built-in capability of the shell itself, and one that's a separate command located in /bin. This is important because the built-in echo doesn't know what the -n flag does, but the /bin/echo command does. A tiny tweak, and we're ready to test it:

/bin/echo -n "solve: "

while read expression
do
  echo "you entered $expression"
  /bin/echo -n "solve: "
done

Let's see what happens:

solve: 1+1
you entered 1+1
solve: ^D

That's more like it.

What we really want though, is a script that's smart enough to recognize whether you've specified parameters on the command line. If you have, it solves that equation, and if you haven't, it drops you into the interactive mode.

That's surprisingly easy to accomplish by testing the $# variable, which indicates how many arguments are given to the script. Want to see if it's greater than zero? Do this:

if [ $# -gt 0 ] ; then

One more refinement before I show you the script in its entirety: I want to have it quit if users type in quit or exit, rather than force them to type ^D to indicate end of file on standard input (which causes the read statement to return false and the loop to end).

This is done with a simple string comparison test, which you'll recall is done with = (the -eq test is for numeric values). So, testing $expression to see whether it is “quit” is easy:

if [ $expression = "quit" ] ; then

To make it a bit more bulletproof, it's actually better here to quote the variable name, so that if users enter a null string (simply press Return), the conditional test won't fail with an ugly error message:

if [ "$expression" = "quit" ] ; then

Because I like to make my scripts flexible, I've also added exit as an alternative to quit, which easily is done with a slightly more complicated conditional test:

if [ "$expression" = "quit" -o
     "$expression" = "exit" ] ; then

The -o is the logical OR statement in a shell conditional test, but I have a feeling you've already figured that out.

______________________

Dave Taylor has been hacking shell scripts for over thirty years. Really. He's the author of the popular "Wicked Cool Shell Scripts" and can be found on Twitter as @DaveTaylor and more generally at www.DaveTaylorOnline.com.

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I use this great command

Mike 2009's picture

I use this great command line calculator

http://www.fnoware.st/?CLC-linux

There is a windows version also that I use on my windows computer

White Paper
Fabric-Based Computing Enables Optimized Hyperscale Data Centers

Today’s modular x86 servers are compute-centric, designed as a least common denominator to support a wide range of IT workloads. Those generic, virtualized IT workloads have much different resource optimization requirements than hyperscale and cloud applications. They have resulted in a “one size fits all” enterprise IT architecture that is not optimized for a specific set of IT workloads, and especially not emerging hyperscale workloads, such as web applications, big data, and object storage. In this report, you will learn how shifting the focus from traditional compute-centric IT architectures to an innovative disaggregated fabric-based architecture can optimize and scale your data center.

Learn More

Sponsored by AMD

White Paper
Red Hat White Paper: Using an Open Source Framework to Catch the Bad Guy

Built-in forensics, incident response, and security with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6

Every security policy provides guidance and requirements for ensuring adequate protection of information and data, as well as high-level technical and administrative security requirements for a system in a given environment. Traditionally, providing security for a system focuses on the confidentiality of the information on it. However, protecting the data integrity and system and data availability is just as important. For example, when processing United States intelligence information, there are three attributes that require protection: confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

Learn more about catching the bad guy in this free white paper.

Learn More

Sponsored by DLT Solutions