This tip comes courtesy of Linux Journal columnist Dave Taylor and No Starch Press.
Any script that reads or appends to a shared data file, such as a log file, needs a reliable way to lock the file so that other instantiations of the script don't step on the updates. The idea is that the existence of a separate lockfile serves as a semaphore, an indicator that a different file is busy and cannot be used. The requesting script waits and tries again, hoping that the file will be freed up relatively promptly, denoted by having its lockfile removed.
Lockfiles are tricky to work with though, because many seemingly foolproof solutions fail to work properly. For example, the following is a typical approach to solving this problem:
while [ -f $lockfile ] ; do sleep 1 done touch $lockfile
Seems like it should work, doesn't it? You loop until the lockfile doesn't exist, then create it to ensure that you own the lockfile and, therefore, can modify the base file safely. If another script with the same loop sees your lock, it will spin until the lockfile vanishes. However, this doesn't in fact work, because although it seems that scripts are run without being swapped out while other processes take their turn, that's not actually true. Imagine what would happen if, right after the done in the loop just shown, but before the touch, this script were swapped out and put back in the processor queue while another script was run instead. That other script would dutifully test for the lockfile, find it missing and create its own version. Then, the script in the queue would swap back in and do a touch, with the result that the two scripts both would think they had exclusive access, which is bad.
Fortunately, Stephen van den Berg and Philip Guenther, authors of the popular procmail e-mail filtering program, include a lockfile command that lets you safely and reliably work with lockfiles in shell scripts.
Many UNIX distributions, including Linux and Mac OS X, have lockfile already installed. You can check whether your system has lockfile simply by typing man 1 lockfile. If you get a man page, you're in luck! If not, download the procmail package from www.procmail.org, and install the lockfile command on your system. The script in this section assumes you have the lockfile command.
#!/bin/sh # filelock - A flexible file-locking mechanism. retries="10" # default number of retries action="lock" # default action nullcmd="/bin/true" # null command for lockfile while getopts "lur:" opt; do case $opt in l ) action="lock" ;; u ) action="unlock" ;; r ) retries="$OPTARG" ;; esac done shift $(($OPTIND - 1)) if [ $# -eq 0 ] ; then cat << EOF >&2 Usage: $0 [-l|-u] [-r retries] lockfilename Where -l requests a lock (the default), -u requests an unlock, -r X specifies a maximum number of retries before it fails (default = $retries). EOF exit 1 fi # Ascertain whether we have lockf or lockfile # system apps if [ -z "$(which lockfile | grep -v '^no ')" ] ; then echo "$0 failed: 'lockfile' utility not found in PATH." >&2 exit 1 fi if [ "$action" = "lock" ] ; then if ! lockfile -1 -r $retries "$1" 2> /dev/null; then echo "$0: Failed: Couldn't create lockfile in time" >&2 exit 1 fi else # action = unlock if [ ! -f "$1" ] ; then echo "$0: Warning: lockfile $1 doesn't exist to unlock" >&2 exit 1 fi rm -f "$1" fi exit 0
Running the Script:
Although the lockfile script isn't one that you'd ordinarily use by itself, you can try to test it by having two terminal windows open. To create a lock, simply specify the name of the file you want to try to lock as an argument of filelock. To remove the lock, add the -u option.
First, create a locked file:
$ filelock /tmp/exclusive.lck $ ls -l /tmp/exclusive.lck -r--r--r-- 1 taylor wheel 1 Mar 21 15:35 ↪/tmp/exclusive.lck
The second time you attempt to lock the file, filelock tries the default number of times (ten) and then fails, as follows:
$ filelock /tmp/exclusive.lck filelock : Failed: Couldn't create lockfile in time
When the first process is done with the file, you can release the lock:
$ filelock -u /tmp/exclusive.lck
To see how the filelock script works with two terminals, run the unlock command in one window while the other window spins trying to establish its own exclusive lock.
Hacking the Script:
Because this script relies on the existence of a lockfile as proof that the lock is still enforced, it would be useful to have an additional parameter that is, say, the longest length of time for which a lock should be valid. If the lockfile routine times out, the last accessed time of the locked file could then be checked, and if the locked file is older than the value of this parameter, it safely can be deleted as a stray, perhaps with a warning message, perhaps not.
This is unlikely to affect you, but lockfile doesn't work with NFS-mounted disks. In fact, a reliable file locking mechanism on an NFS-mounted disk is quite complex. A better strategy that sidesteps the problem entirely is to create lockfiles only on local disks.
Excerpted with permission from the book Wicked Cool Shell Scripts: 101 Scripts for Linux, Mac OS X, and UNIX Systems by Dave Taylor, published by No Starch Press ( www.nostarch.com/wcss.htm).
Webinar: 8 Signs You’re Beyond Cron
On Demand NOW
Join Linux Journal and Pat Cameron, Director of Automation Technology at HelpSystems, as they discuss the eight primary advantages of moving beyond cron job scheduling. In this webinar, you’ll learn about integrating cron with an enterprise scheduler.View Now!
|Dr Hjkl on the Command Line||May 21, 2015|
|Initializing and Managing Services in Linux: Past, Present and Future||May 20, 2015|
|Goodbye, Pi. Hello, C.H.I.P.||May 18, 2015|
|Using Hiera with Puppet||May 14, 2015|
|Urgent Kernel Patch for Ubuntu||May 12, 2015|
|Gartner Dubs DivvyCloud Cool Cloud Management Vendor||May 12, 2015|
- Initializing and Managing Services in Linux: Past, Present and Future
- Dr Hjkl on the Command Line
- Goodbye, Pi. Hello, C.H.I.P.
- Using Hiera with Puppet
- Mumblehard--Let's End Its Five-Year Reign
- Gartner Dubs DivvyCloud Cool Cloud Management Vendor
- Infinite BusyBox with systemd
- Urgent Kernel Patch for Ubuntu
- It's Easier to Ask Forgiveness...
- A More Stable Future for Ubuntu