OpenOffice.org ODF, Python and XML
OpenOffice.org Writer showed what we expected. Both the double hyphen and the en dash changed into em dashes, and the starting double quote curves the right way.
Now, here's the rest. The expression to deal with the ending double quote is the mirror image of the starting double quote. In order to write an ending/closing double quote, we require the quote character either to be at the end of the string (\Z) or followed by whitespace. Again, when we do the replacement, we want to replace only the quote itself, not the whitespace. Hence, the Ending Double-quote PATtern (eDpat) is given by:
eDpat = re.compile(r'("\Z)|("(?=\s))', re.U)
By the way, we compile all these patterns because we're going to use them over and over again when processing documents.
To handle single quotes ('like these'), we basically can do the same thing, except for a couple of issues. First, is the problem of contractions. When handling a double-quote character, we didn't cover the case where it was surrounded on both sides by non-whitespace. With single quotes (or apostrophes), we can't avoid that, because of words such as can't. Therefore, although the starting single-quote pattern can match the starting double-quote pattern, the other one, which doubles as an apostrophe in contractions, has a looser pattern. Here's what I came up with:
eSpat = re.compile(r"(?<=\S)'", re.U)
Because the pattern has an apostrophe in it, we delimit the pattern string using double-quote characters. This expression matches a single quote, but only when preceded immediately by a non-whitespace character.
The second issue, which the code doesn't address, is that of contractions beginning with an apostrophe, such as 'tis the season or stick 'em up.
The script treats the leading apostrophe like the start of a single-quoted phrase, and the single quote will face the wrong way. This probably will need a manual work-around.
Putting all this together, we have fix4.py:
#!/usr/bin/python -tt import xml.dom.minidom import sys import re # new in fix3.py DEBUG = 1 def dprint(what): if DEBUG == 0: return sys.stderr.write(what.encode('ascii', 'replace') + '\n') emDash=u'\u2014' enDash=u'\u2013' # new in fix3.py sDquote=u'\u201c' # new in fix3.py eDquote=u'\u201d' # new in fix4.py sSquote=u'\u2018' # new in fix4.py eSquote=u'\u2019' # new in fix4.py # sDpat: pattern for starting dbl quote, as # "Go! <-- the quote there # We look for it either at start (\A) or # after a space (\s), and we want it to be # followed by a non-space sDpat = re.compile(r'(\A|(?<=\s))"(?=\S)', re.U) # new in fix3.py eDpat = re.compile(r'("\Z)|("(?=\s))', re.U) # new in fix4.py sSpat = re.compile(r"(\A|(?<=\s))'(?=\S)", re.U) # new in fix4.py eSpat = re.compile(r"(?<=\S)'", re.U) # new in fix4.py def fixdata(td, depth): dprint("depth=%d: childNode: %s" % (depth, td.data)) # OK, so '--' becomes em dash everywhere td.data = td.data.replace('--', emDash) # Change 'en' dash to 'em' dash td.data = td.data.replace(enDash , emDash) # new in fix3.py # Make a nice starting curly-quote # new in fix3.py td.data = sDpat.sub(sDquote, td.data) # new in fix3.py td.data = eDpat.sub(eDquote, td.data) # new in fix4.py # Make nice curly single-quote characters td.data = sSpat.sub(sSquote, td.data) # new in fix4.py td.data = eSpat.sub(eSquote, td.data) # new in fix4.py def handle_xml_tree(aNode, depth): if aNode.hasChildNodes(): for kid in aNode.childNodes: handle_xml_tree(kid, depth+1) else: if 'data' in dir(aNode): fixdata(aNode, depth) def doit(argv): doc = xml.dom.minidom.parse(argv) handle_xml_tree(doc, 0) sys.stdout.write(doc.toxml('utf-8')) if __name__ == "__main__": doit(sys.argv)
Let's try that on our example:
% ln -sf fix4.py fixit.py % ./fixit.sh ex3.odt ex3-4.odt depth=5: childNode: The ?en? dash ? is too short depth=5: childNode: The ?em? dash ? which is longer ? is what we need. depth=5: childNode: And two hyphens -- ugly -- should be turned into ?em? dashes. depth=5: childNode: This line has "straight double quotes" depth=5: childNode: These 'single quotes' aren't pretty. % oowriter ex3-4.odt
Let's review what we've done here:
Wrote scripts to unpack and repack ODF files.
Learned about using Python to understand the structure of ODF files.
Wrote a Python program to perform useful transformations on an OpenOffice.org Writer file, using regular expressions and the built-in string methods.
Getting Started with DevOps - Including New Data on IT Performance from Puppet Labs 2015 State of DevOps Report
August 27, 2015
12:00 PM CDT
DevOps represents a profound change from the way most IT departments have traditionally worked: from siloed teams and high-anxiety releases to everyone collaborating on uneventful and more frequent releases of higher-quality code. It doesn't matter how large or small an organization is, or even whether it's historically slow moving or risk averse — there are ways to adopt DevOps sanely, and get measurable results in just weeks.
Free to Linux Journal readers.Register Now!
- Three More Lessons
- Django Models and Migrations
- August 2015 Issue of Linux Journal: Programming
- Hacking a Safe with Bash
- Secure Server Deployments in Hostile Territory, Part II
- The Controversy Behind Canonical's Intellectual Property Policy
- Shashlik - a Tasty New Android Simulator
- Huge Package Overhaul for Debian and Ubuntu
- Embed Linux in Monitoring and Control Systems
- KDE Reveals Plasma Mobile