OpenOffice.org ODF, Python and XML
That exercise proved the concept, so now we can get to work. My wife's poetry book was about 60 pages long, and it needed these issues addressed:
Those straight quotes, which came from plain-text e-mail messages or other word processors.
Apostrophes (or single quotes), which also were straight rather than curled the right way.
Double hyphens and shorter dashes (the en dash), which should all be changed into the longer em dash.
OpenOffice.org Writer has keystroke sequences for creating the en dash as well as the longer em dash. Sometimes the wrong sequence was typed, so an en dash appeared instead of the desired em dash. Plain text imported from e-mail messages sometimes had double hyphens (that is, --).
Concretely, we want to transform what's shown in Figure 5 into what's shown in Figure 6.
Let's develop the automated script in two pieces, and let's do it top-down. The top layer will create a temporary directory, unpack the original document and then run the bottom layer, a program (designated fixit.py) to modify content.xml. Afterward, it will pack up the files into the new document and clean up.
I want to use the highest-level language reasonable for each task; for this top layer, that's probably the shell. This script, called fixit.sh, turned out to be longer than I thought it would be, mostly because of all the error checking:
#!/bin/bash # Script to fix up OpenDocument Text (.odt) files # "cd" to the directory containing "fixit.py". # Make $TMPDIR, a new temporary directory TMPDIR=/tmp/ODFfixit.$(date +%y%m%d.%H%M%S).$$ if rm -rf $TMPDIR && mkdir $TMPDIR; then : # Be happy else echo >&2 "Can't (re)create $TMPDIR; aborting" exit 1 fi OLDFILE=$1 NEWFILE=$2 # Check number of parameters. # Ensure $NEWFILE's dir exists and is writable. # Quietly Unzip $OLDFILE. Whine and abort on error. if [[ $# -eq 2 ]] && touch $NEWFILE && rm -f $NEWFILE && unzip -q $OLDFILE -d $TMPDIR ; then : # All good; be happy. else # Trouble! Print usage message, clean up, abort. echo >&2 "Usage: $0 OLDFILE NEWFILE" echo >&2 " ... both OpenDocument Text (odt) files" echo >&2 "Note: 'OLDFILE' must already exist." rm -rf $TMPDIR exit 1 fi # Save file list in $F; is content.xml there? F=$(unzip -l $OLDFILE | sed -n '/:[0-9][0-9]/s|^.*:.. *||p') if echo "$F" | grep -q '^content\.xml$'; then : # Good news; we have content.xml else echo >&2 "content.xml not in $OLDFILE; aborting" echo >&2 TMPDIR is $TMPDIR exit 1 fi # Now invoke the Python program to fix content.xml mv $TMPDIR/content.xml $TMPDIR/OLDcontent.xml if ./fixit.py $TMPDIR/OLDcontent.xml > \ $TMPDIR/content.xml; then : # It worked. else echo >&2 "fixit.py failed in $TMPDIR; aborting" exit 1 fi if (cd $TMPDIR; zip -q - $F) | cat > $NEWFILE; then # Everything worked! Clean up $TMPDIR rm -rf $TMPDIR else # something Bad happened. echo >&2 "zip failed in $TMPDIR on $F" exit 1 fi
It's long but straightforward, so I explain only a few things here.
First, the temporary directory name includes the date and time (the date +% stuff), and the shell's process ID (the $$) prevents name collisions.
Second, the grep line looks the way it does because I want it to accept content.xml but not something like discontent.xml or content-xml.
Finally, we clean up the temporary directory ($TMPDIR) except in some error cases, where we leave it intact for debugging and tell the user where it is.
We can't run this script yet, because we don't yet have fixit.py actually modify content.xml. But, we can use a stub to validate what we have so far. The fixit.sh script assumes fixit.py will take one parameter (the original content.xml's pathname) and put the result onto stdout. This just happens to match the calling sequence for /bin/cat with one parameter; hence, if we use /bin/cat as our fixit.py, fixit.sh should give us a new document with the same content as the old. So, let's give it a whirl:
% ln -s /bin/cat fixit.py % ./fixit.sh ex1.odt foo.odt % ls -l ex1.odt foo.odt -rw-r--r-- 1 collin users 7839 2006-11-14 17:50 ex1.odt -rw-r--r-- 1 collin users 7900 2006-11-14 19:45 foo.odt % oowriter foo.odt
The new file, foo.odt, is slightly larger than ex1.odt, but when I looked at it with OpenOffice.org Writer, it had the right stuff.
As far as writing a program for manipulating content.xml—well, back in the 1990s, I probably would have spent many hours with yacc (or bison)—but today, Python with its XML libraries is a more natural choice.
Getting Started with DevOps - Including New Data on IT Performance from Puppet Labs 2015 State of DevOps Report
August 27, 2015
12:00 PM CDT
DevOps represents a profound change from the way most IT departments have traditionally worked: from siloed teams and high-anxiety releases to everyone collaborating on uneventful and more frequent releases of higher-quality code. It doesn't matter how large or small an organization is, or even whether it's historically slow moving or risk averse — there are ways to adopt DevOps sanely, and get measurable results in just weeks.
Free to Linux Journal readers.Register Now!
- Django Models and Migrations
- Hacking a Safe with Bash
- Secure Server Deployments in Hostile Territory, Part II
- Huge Package Overhaul for Debian and Ubuntu
- Home Automation with Raspberry Pi
- The Controversy Behind Canonical's Intellectual Property Policy
- Shashlik - a Tasty New Android Simulator
- Embed Linux in Monitoring and Control Systems
- KDE Reveals Plasma Mobile
- Purism Librem 13 Review