An Automated Reliable Backup Solution
After setting up SSH key authentication, I created a GnuPG key that Duplicity would use to sign and encrypt the backups. I created a key as my normal user on the client machine. Having the GnuPG key associated with a normal user account prevents backing up the entire filesystem. If I decided at some point that I wanted to back up the entire filesystem, I simply would create a GnuPG key as the root user on the client machine. To generate a GPG key, I used the following command:
$ gpg --gen-key
Once both the GnuPG and SSH keys were created, the first thing I did was make a CD containing copies of both my SSH and GnuPG keys. Then I installed and set up Keychain. Keychain is an application that manages long-lived instances of ssh-agent and gpg-agent to provide a mechanism that eliminates the need for password entry for every command that requires either the GnuPG or SSH keys. On a Debian client machine, I first had to install the keychain and ssh-askpass packages. Then I edited the /etc/X11/Xsession.options file and commented out the use-ssh-agent line so that the ssh-agent was not started every time I logged in with an Xsession. Then I added the following lines to my .bashrc file to start up Keychain properly:
/usr/bin/keychain ~/.ssh/id_dsa 2> /dev/null source ~/.keychain/`hostname`-sh
After that, I added an xterm instantiation to my gnome-session so that an xterm in turn starts an instance of bash, which reads in the .bashrc file and runs Keychain. When Keychain is executed, it checks to see whether the key is already cached; if it is not, it prompts me once for my key passwords every time I start my computer and log in.
Once Keychain was installed and configured, I was able to make unattended backups of directories simply by configuring cron to execute Duplicity. I backed up my home directory with the following command:
$ duplicity --encrypt-key AA43E426 \ --sign-key AA43E426 /home/username \ scp://user@backup_serv/backup/home
After backing up my home directory, I verified the backup with the following command:
$ duplicity --verify --encrypt-key AA43E426 \ --sign-key AA43E426 \ scp://user@backup_serv/backup/home \ /home/username
Suppose that I accidentally removed my home directory on my client machine. To recover it from the backup server, I would use the following command:
$ duplicity --encrypt-key AA43E426 \ --sign-key AA43E426 \ scp://user@backup_serv/backup/home \ /home/username
However, my GnuPG and SSH keys are normally stored in my home directory. Without the keys I cannot recover my backups. Hence, I first recovered my GPG and SSH keys from the CD on which I previously saved my keys.
This solution also provides the capability of cleaning up files on the backup server for a specified date and time. Given this capability, I also added the following command to my cron tab to remove any backups more than two months old:
$ duplicity --remove-older-than 2M \ --encrypt-key AA43E426 --sign-key AA43E426 \ scp://user@backup_serv/backup/home \ /home/username
This command conserves disk space, but it limits how far back I can recover data.
This solution has worked very well for me. It provides the key functionality that I need and meets all of my requirements. It is not perfect, however. Duplicity currently does not support hard-links; it treats them as individual files. Hence, in a backup recovery that contains hard-links, individual files are produced rather than one file with associated hard-links.
Despite Duplicity's lack of support for hard-links, this is still my choice of backup solution. It seems that development of Duplicity has recently picked up, and maybe this phase of development will add hard-link support. Maybe I will find the time to add this support myself. Either way, this provides an unattended, encrypted, redundant network backup solution that takes very little money or effort to set up.
Andrew J. De Ponte is a security professional and avid software developer. He has worked with a variety of UNIX-based distributions since 1997 and believes the key to success in general is the balance of design and productivity. He awaits comments and questions at cyphactor@socall.rr.com.
Today’s modular x86 servers are compute-centric, designed as a least common denominator to support a wide range of IT workloads. Those generic, virtualized IT workloads have much different resource optimization requirements than hyperscale and cloud applications. They have resulted in a “one size fits all” enterprise IT architecture that is not optimized for a specific set of IT workloads, and especially not emerging hyperscale workloads, such as web applications, big data, and object storage. In this report, you will learn how shifting the focus from traditional compute-centric IT architectures to an innovative disaggregated fabric-based architecture can optimize and scale your data center.
Sponsored by AMD
Built-in forensics, incident response, and security with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Every security policy provides guidance and requirements for ensuring adequate protection of information and data, as well as high-level technical and administrative security requirements for a system in a given environment. Traditionally, providing security for a system focuses on the confidentiality of the information on it. However, protecting the data integrity and system and data availability is just as important. For example, when processing United States intelligence information, there are three attributes that require protection: confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
Learn more about catching the bad guy in this free white paper.
Sponsored by DLT Solutions
| Making Linux and Android Get Along (It's Not as Hard as It Sounds) | May 16, 2013 |
| Drupal Is a Framework: Why Everyone Needs to Understand This | May 15, 2013 |
| Home, My Backup Data Center | May 13, 2013 |
| Non-Linux FOSS: Seashore | May 10, 2013 |
| Trying to Tame the Tablet | May 08, 2013 |
| Dart: a New Web Programming Experience | May 07, 2013 |
- New Products
- Making Linux and Android Get Along (It's Not as Hard as It Sounds)
- Drupal Is a Framework: Why Everyone Needs to Understand This
- A Topic for Discussion - Open Source Feature-Richness?
- Home, My Backup Data Center
- RSS Feeds
- New Products
- Trying to Tame the Tablet
- What's the tweeting protocol?
- Dart: a New Web Programming Experience
- Drupal is an Awesome CMS and a Crappy development framework
3 hours 15 min ago - IT industry leaders
5 hours 38 min ago - Reply to comment | Linux Journal
22 hours 26 min ago - Reply to comment | Linux Journal
1 day 59 min ago - Reply to comment | Linux Journal
1 day 2 hours ago - great post
1 day 2 hours ago - Google Docs
1 day 3 hours ago - Reply to comment | Linux Journal
1 day 8 hours ago - Reply to comment | Linux Journal
1 day 8 hours ago - Web Hosting IQ
1 day 10 hours ago
Enter to Win an Adafruit Prototyping Pi Plate Kit for Raspberry Pi

It's Raspberry Pi month at Linux Journal. Each week in May, Adafruit will be giving away a Pi-related prize to a lucky, randomly drawn LJ reader. Winners will be announced weekly.
Fill out the fields below to enter to win this week's prize-- a Prototyping Pi Plate Kit for Raspberry Pi.
Congratulations to our winners so far:
- 5-8-13, Pi Starter Pack: Jack Davis
- 5-15-13, Pi Model B 512MB RAM: Patrick Dunn
- Next winner announced on 5-21-13!
Free Webinar: Linux Backup and Recovery
Most companies incorporate backup procedures for critical data, which can be restored quickly if a loss occurs. However, fewer companies are prepared for catastrophic system failures, in which they lose all data, the entire operating system, applications, settings, patches and more, reducing their system(s) to “bare metal.” After all, before data can be restored to a system, there must be a system to restore it to.
In this one hour webinar, learn how to enhance your existing backup strategies for better disaster recovery preparedness using Storix System Backup Administrator (SBAdmin), a highly flexible bare-metal recovery solution for UNIX and Linux systems.




Comments
Duplicity for Windows
Those with Windows clients should check out the wonderful duplicati implementation
Actually, you will also have
Actually, you will also have the added complication of file system issues if backing up the forked HFS+ file system on the Mac to the single fork file system on the Linux box.
Dave from nanovor game
I was not able to covery every aspect.
I was not able to covery every aspect. Getting it working on Mac OS X is pretty close to what is required for getting it working on Linux. However, Windows is a completely different experience, it required a huge amount of work on my part and I have not had a chance to write it all up yet in final form. Work has been consuming most of my time as of late, but I am still trying to get something out to help people like yourself.
Kevin Horn - club penguin
awesome
This article is fantastic. Great work. Just what I needed to jumpstart my move to this solution without having to learn too much before I get it working.
Thanks again.
-N
Any updates on sourcing of components?
Andrew:
Are there any updates on sourcing of components and their features?
I started by looking at
I started by looking at small form-factor motherboards that I might use. I had used Mini-ITX motherboards in a number of other projects and knew that there was close to full Linux support for it. Given that this project did not require a fast CPU, I decided on the EPIA Mini-ITX ML8000A motherboard, which has an 800MHz CPU, a 100Mb network interface and one 32-bit PCI slot built in to it.
Unclear
I am having difficulty understanding what you are specifically referring to. If you are referreing to the hardware and the functionality of it, not much has change since the article was released. If not, please drop me an e-mail at cyphactor@socal.rr.com with further questions.
Is something missing....?
When I read this article I was lead to believe that since the author has "12 computers, which run a combinations of Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows. Losing my work is unacceptable!" we were going to a see a solution that provided for backup of all the OSs he listed. Unfortunately it appears, only Linux like OSs are supported. Foiled again!
Patrick
Try BackupPC
You may want to check out BackupPC here. I've done a write-up here about integrating Windows Active Directory clients with the BackupPC server.
Limitations of Reality
You are correct, when you did read the article it did lead you to beleive I have 12 computers running a variety of operating systems Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows. The limitations of reality are that there is a word limit for articles. Hence I was not able to covery every aspect. Getting it working on Mac OS X is pretty close to what is required for getting it working on Linux. However, Windows is a completely different experience, it required a huge amount of work on my part and I have not had a chance to write it all up yet in final form (if I can remember all that I did). Work has been consuming most of my time as of late, but I am still trying to get something out to help people like yourself. My ultimate goal is to expand this current solution into a more complete feature filled solution that is pretty trivial to setup. Sadly it isn't there yet, but it is on the back burner. If you have any questions feel free to e-mail me at cyphactor@socal.rr.com.
Actually, you will also have
Actually, you will also have the added complication of file system issues if backing up the forked HFS+ file system on the Mac to the single fork file system on the Linux box.
Backup for Windows
Maybe a solution for your Windows machine is a free software called Cobian Backup (http://www.educ.umu.se/~cobian/cobianbackup.htm). It works very well.
Best regards.
Tabare
Rsync backup for Windows to a Linux server
Not that Rsync is the best solution out there(I do really like the duplicity backup solution outlined above)there is a way to use Cygwin and Rsync to a Linux server.
Check it out here http://www.gaztronics.net/rsync.php I have not tried it, but I may if I cannot get Duplicity to play well with Cygwin
Try using this page--Running Duplicity in Cygwin
I haven't set this up yet, but tomorrow's the day. I will try to post to let you know how it goes. See this site for instructions on running duplicity in Cygwin. I don't see why it wouldn't work.... http://katastrophos.net/andre/blog/2006/04/03/duplicity-042-on-cygwin/