In response to Cameron Spitzer's letter [June 2006, “Xoops! A Security
Hole”], Juan Marcelo Rodriguez may have forgotten to mention that Xoops
needs the permissions of the uploads, cache and templates_c directories
set to 777 just for the install. You can change them back! When you
log in to the application for the first time, if they are still set to
777, the application will ask you to change them.
I like how the magazine has changed. I think it's exciting. It's like watching it grow (literally, too). The design upgrade brings it closer to the style of Network Computing, IT Architect or other glossy CMP periodicals I also read, and nicely not so “pagemaker crayola” as Wired looks. I think this look reaches out to those who would flip thru the magazine rack and pick up a Wired or PC Gamer. That must have provoked an argument or two, because that's also an editorial and policy change for the whole magazine. It hasn't lost the hard tech edge, though. If I ever want to read about how to write a device driver, I don't have to look very far.
Boy, this has been fun reading the Letters column. Look at all the people getting riled up about Nick's trolls! I thought I saw Nick sitting under a big bridge somewhere, waiting to point out the obvious with his thick finger, just to watch all the readers squirm. I think it's brilliant! (Who among us has not enjoyed reading through a trolling thread on Slashdot?) This makes the magazine not boring, and that will keep plenty of us around.
Mod me down for my casual comments but don't unsubscribe me. I think it's important that Nick point out the obvious issues in the Linux community. It's like big group therapy. “Uncle Nick” is going to make fun of distros that are lagging behind! Of course he appreciates how hard they all work, that's given. But he really doesn't want any distro to lag behind, because that doesn't do service to Linux as a whole.
Maybe if “Uncle Nick” points out some of these obvious things, we'll
wake up and help out. Or maybe we'll listen to our own trolls and hear
ourselves. When Linux Journal had the “nekkid
piano player” cover, the Letters
column was filled with the laments from the stuffed-shirts—that was
fun! I see more of that, but now it's even more cogent to the discussion:
by pointing out these obvious things in an opinionated way, he's poking
us in the ribs to at least join in the conversation! (And maybe we'll
The “Google Maps” installment of Reuven Lerner's At the Forge
column [June 2006] was simple
enough to get lots of noobs excited—that's great! However, creating
dynamically named variables like myMarker$count is bad style that I'd
so there's no need for that kind of 1970s hackery.
I can't even make it off page 10 of the July 2006 issue that I just got today. For the last several months, I have read for the most part how “concerned” or “upset” people are for the changes in LJ. And how they are going to quit subscribing to the magazine, unless things are turned back around again soon. Why is it that people are so afraid of change? Change is good folks, really, it is!
Anyways, I love the new dimensions of the magazine. I really enjoy
the /etc/rants too. I find a good chuckle in them, and they're informative too. I
also like the in-depth coverage, even though some readers may feel that
it's a waste. I am sure that there are other readers that feel the same
as I do. Kudos to LJ for making it fun to
read again and get
the feeling of a child again, waiting for Christmas day to come, when
the new magazine is supposed to be coming in the mail any day now.
In response to Doc Searls' “Causes and Effects” article [July
2006], I just wanted to
say thanks. I really enjoy reading articles like this. Being a supporter
of Net Neutrality, I feel that we need to get the word out more. We need
to do what we can to make sure people are aware of proposals like Ted
Stevens' Telecom bill because like most things, people aren't going to
take notice until it is directly affecting them, and usually by then it
is too late. Once the door is closed, it takes a lot for people to
get that door opened back up.
I don't understand this. Since that copy of LJ with the rant on KDE vs. GNOME [April 2006], I've been reading a lot of support for KDE in LJ (for the last two issues, no less), while scantly any for the GNOME side. I find Mr Soulier's “Even Einstein Agrees” [June 2006, Letters] rather cute, but I think he attempted to apply Einstein's quote backwards.
My school's labs all use KDE, and I'm almost tempted to configure .xsession or .xinitrc to use twm instead. I think the following analogy makes the most sense. KDE is like Gentoo, you could configure it to a very fine level of detail, but you can hardly do any work until you have tinkered with it. GNOME is like Ubuntu, you need only very little customization to make it work the way that you want and expect. Things in both Ubuntu and GNOME are well integrated. I'm not sure I'd use the same description for KDE or Gentoo. I'm thankful that Linus Torvalds started the Linux movement, but he couldn't be more wrong with the KDE vs. GNOME issue. And know more than enough people (many of whom are far smarter than I am, and from whom I seek advice and respect their opinions) in my Computing Science Student Society who couldn't think of a single good thing to say about KDE.
With such a severe lack of balance on this issue, sometimes I'm glad that
I don't subscribe to LJ. I used to have more respect, when it did create
dialog. Now it almost seems like discussion has degenerated to fan-boyism,
and dissent is not tolerated.
I fail to see any pro-KDE slant in Linux Journal content. Outside of those (including myself) who express their opinions one way or another, we take great pains to make sure our content reflects a neutral view. —Ed.
Thank you very much for publishing the “USB Pendrives and Distributions
for Them” article in LJ [June 2006]. I have toyed with
Small Linux) and even purchased one of their pendrives to contribute to
their project. In the past, however, I wasn't able to follow through with
creating my own pendrive, and Juan Marcelo Rodriguez's article came as a godsend.
I downloaded DSL-N, which has the 2.6 kernel. Despite the fact that this
project still has some bugs, I sense lots of potential in it and will
try to help them by reporting bugs and testing. I felt very happy about
making my own pendrive (I have some troubles with the wireless card but
I haven't done enough research on the matter to be able to ask smart
questions), and I look forward to testing other live distros.
Diego A. Acosta
I read, with not inconsiderable interest, parts of the article by Jon
“maddog” Hall entitled “Sinking of the USS
Proprietary”, Linux Journal,
July 2006, wherein appeared: “USS
Compact”. Well, now,
I must really wonder if he instead meant “USS
Compaq”. I just hope
you can now concur! “And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall
make you free” (ref.: John 8:32, KJV, 1611). Tempus fugit et
ad augusta per angusta.
Joseph Roy D. North
Shame on you for using proprietary software. Of all people, an old OS/2 veteran such as yourself should surely be aware of the fundamental evils of proprietary software.
Remember TrueSpectra Photo-Graphics? It was a wonderful OS/2 application that seamlessly combined raster and vector graphics. Where did it go? Down the proprietary rat hole. All the progress that TrueSpectra made in image processing has effectively vanished as if it had never existed. That is an unconscionable waste, and we are still waiting for someone to reinvent the wheel.
While I formerly tolerated proprietary software, experience has pushed me
toward a different view. I now stand in full agreement with Hans Reiser,
who says, “Equal Source Code Access Is A Civil Right”.
Another old OS/2 veteran
After being a subscriber to Linux Journal from the very first issue,
I must confess that the articles started to lose interest for me around
the year 2000. I assumed the journal had, to use the TV metaphor,
“jumped the shark”, given the popularity of everything with the word
Linux at the time. It was almost simply out of loyalty that I have
continued to resubscribe the last several years. That is, until about
a few issues ago. Suddenly, the articles are much more relevant
and useful. Whatever you have done, please keep it up!
Fast/Flexible Linux OS Recovery
On Demand Now
In this live one-hour webinar, learn how to enhance your existing backup strategies for complete disaster recovery preparedness using Storix System Backup Administrator (SBAdmin), a highly flexible full-system recovery solution for UNIX and Linux systems.
Join Linux Journal's Shawn Powers and David Huffman, President/CEO, Storix, Inc.
Free to Linux Journal readers.Register Now!
- Download "Linux Management with Red Hat Satellite: Measuring Business Impact and ROI"
- Petros Koutoupis' RapidDisk
- ServersCheck's Thermal Imaging Camera Sensor
- The Italian Army Switches to LibreOffice
- Linux Mint 18
- Oracle vs. Google: Round 2
- The FBI and the Mozilla Foundation Lock Horns over Known Security Hole
- Privacy and the New Math
- Varnish Software's Varnish Massive Storage Engine
Until recently, IBM’s Power Platform was looked upon as being the system that hosted IBM’s flavor of UNIX and proprietary operating system called IBM i. These servers often are found in medium-size businesses running ERP, CRM and financials for on-premise customers. By enabling the Power platform to run the Linux OS, IBM now has positioned Power to be the platform of choice for those already running Linux that are facing scalability issues, especially customers looking at analytics, big data or cloud computing.
￼Running Linux on IBM’s Power hardware offers some obvious benefits, including improved processing speed and memory bandwidth, inherent security, and simpler deployment and management. But if you look beyond the impressive architecture, you’ll also find an open ecosystem that has given rise to a strong, innovative community, as well as an inventory of system and network management applications that really help leverage the benefits offered by running Linux on Power.Get the Guide