/var/opinion - It's free. It's proprietary. No, it's two (click) two (click) two distros in one.
This column has a new name, /var/opinion. I changed it for three reasons. First, as much as I enjoy a good rant (and I will continue to rant whenever the mood strikes), I've found too much to rave about lately. I find it constraining to produce a rant when I get excited about something good. Second, I named it /var/opinion because a column is, by definition, an opinion. We editors and writers take that for granted, but not all readers are as savvy about publishing practices. Some readers express dissatisfaction when someone expresses an opinion in a column. I'm not finding fault with these readers for doing so, because they simply may not know better. The title is meant to remind them that an editorial column is opinion. The two are inseparable. Finally, as many readers were so kind to point out, /etc/rant was not LSB-compliant. So I changed the location of the column to /var.
Linspire recently announced that it will ship a community-driven distribution called Freespire sometime in August 2006. When it gets here, I'll decide if it's worthy of a rant or a rave. But the idea is spot on, and worthy of a rave.
Let's get the self-serving nature of this move out of the way. Linspire may grab a lot of pieces from Debian and other sources in order to produce the Linspire distribution, but the company still has to do a lot of work fine-tuning the distribution to make it easier to use than the competition. Linspire is attempting to off-load that work to the volunteer community. It sounds like Linspire is exploiting volunteers, but if so, Linspire is just joining a very big club. Red Hat created Fedora Core 5 in part to off-load the development of the core distribution to volunteers. Countless Debian-based distributions exploit the hard work of Debian volunteers. So, unless you want to spread the blame across just about every distribution available, Linspire doesn't deserve any criticism for doing the same.
Let me squash another probable criticism. Is Freespire Linspire's response to the threat of an Ubuntu/Kubuntu revolution? Probably. But again, what difference does that make if we Linux users benefit?
Here's the cool thing about Freespire. The Linspire folks are adopting some of the most significant improvements you'll find in other distributions, such as Ubuntu. For example, you will be forced to create a user account and will no longer log in as root by default.
More important, the plan is to make it customizable. Those who are anal about licensing issues can have a completely open-source version of Freespire. Those who want to use Java, Flash, play DVDs or do anything else that requires an alternative license or proprietary software can get Freespire with support for these additions.
Maybe you're a license freak, in which case you don't use Java, Flash or play DVDs on Linux. Sorry, but I'm not only unafraid of most licenses (some are unacceptable, but not most), I actually use and pay for proprietary software. For example, there's a new proprietary graphics program out there called Pixel, and it looks fantastic. It's almost like an incredibly inexpensive Photoshop clone. It is far more intuitive and friendly than GIMP. So, to me, it's worth every penny. Visit www.kanzelsberger.com/pixel for more information, and don't be a cheapskate if you like what you see.
I also want Flash support for my browser, I want to play DVDs, and I can't live without Java. Aside from applications like Jedit and Eclipse, my favorite Java applet is the doppler radar applet you can find on the National Weather Service site (NOAA). Just visit www.srh.noaa.gov and select your location, click on the radar map and then select one of the radar types (composite reflectivity or base reflectivity, among others). I went tornado chasing while I lived in Missouri, and I found this feature to be invaluable. By the way, I'm told NOAA has adopted Linux as its standard platform.
Back to Freespire. If Freespire attracts a community of developers, it could easily turn out to be my distribution of choice. Why? I think Linspire is by far the best desktop distribution available. Linspire blows away every other distribution in terms of ease of use.
In spite of all this praise, I don't use Linspire on a daily basis. One reason I don't use it is because Linspire takes so long to stay up to date with KDE and hardware support. It always has an older version of KDE, and it doesn't even install on my latest dual-core AMD64 machine.
Just as the Fedora developers have been able to keep Fedora more up to date than Red Hat was able to do internally, perhaps the Freespire developers will be able to keep Linspire current, and therefore more attractive to people like me. And, maybe even you. Keep an eye on Freespire. I will.
Nicholas Petreley is Editor in Chief of Linux Journal and a former programmer, teacher, analyst and consultant who has been working with and writing about Linux for more than ten years.
Practical Task Scheduling Deployment
July 20, 2016 12:00 pm CDT
One of the best things about the UNIX environment (aside from being stable and efficient) is the vast array of software tools available to help you do your job. Traditionally, a UNIX tool does only one thing, but does that one thing very well. For example, grep is very easy to use and can search vast amounts of data quickly. The find tool can find a particular file or files based on all kinds of criteria. It's pretty easy to string these tools together to build even more powerful tools, such as a tool that finds all of the .log files in the /home directory and searches each one for a particular entry. This erector-set mentality allows UNIX system administrators to seem to always have the right tool for the job.
Cron traditionally has been considered another such a tool for job scheduling, but is it enough? This webinar considers that very question. The first part builds on a previous Geek Guide, Beyond Cron, and briefly describes how to know when it might be time to consider upgrading your job scheduling infrastructure. The second part presents an actual planning and implementation framework.
Join Linux Journal's Mike Diehl and Pat Cameron of Help Systems.
Free to Linux Journal readers.Register Now!
- SUSE LLC's SUSE Manager
- My +1 Sword of Productivity
- Non-Linux FOSS: Caffeine!
- Managing Linux Using Puppet
- Murat Yener and Onur Dundar's Expert Android Studio (Wrox)
- SuperTuxKart 0.9.2 Released
- Google's SwiftShader Released
- Parsing an RSS News Feed with a Bash Script
- Doing for User Space What We Did for Kernel Space
- Rogue Wave Software's Zend Server
With all the industry talk about the benefits of Linux on Power and all the performance advantages offered by its open architecture, you may be considering a move in that direction. If you are thinking about analytics, big data and cloud computing, you would be right to evaluate Power. The idea of using commodity x86 hardware and replacing it every three years is an outdated cost model. It doesn’t consider the total cost of ownership, and it doesn’t consider the advantage of real processing power, high-availability and multithreading like a demon.
This ebook takes a look at some of the practical applications of the Linux on Power platform and ways you might bring all the performance power of this open architecture to bear for your organization. There are no smoke and mirrors here—just hard, cold, empirical evidence provided by independent sources. I also consider some innovative ways Linux on Power will be used in the future.Get the Guide