Tighter SSH Security with Two-Factor Authentication

How to set up two-factor authentication using a USB pendrive and ssh-agent for root logins.
Example 3: Tightening Up

We need to close a potential vulnerability before using this system in the wild.

Using ssh-agent and agent forwarding allows the remote SSH server to query the private key stored on your local computer. However, if you use this system to log in to multiple computers, an intruder on one machine can potentially highjack those keys to break in to another machine. In that case, this system could be more dangerous than one using static passwords.

To illustrate the problem, let's expand our example network from two to three nodes by adding machine3 to the mix. Create key pairs for both bob and root on machine3, as described in Examples 1 and 2, and add root's private key to ssh-agent on machine1.

Now, ssh to machine3 as bob using the agent-forwarding option -A. Run ssh-add -l, and you can see the public keys for both machine2 and machine3:

   2048 fa:5c:4b:73:88:...: ... /media/usbdisk/key-rsa-root@machine2 (RSA)
   2048 26:b6:e3:99:c1:...: ... /media/usbdisk/key-rsa-root@machine3 (RSA)

In this example, ssh-agent on machine1 caches the private keys for machine2 and machine3. This single agent allows us to log in as root on either computer. However, using the single agent also potentially allows an intruder on machine2 to log in as root on machine3 and vice versa. This is not good.

Fortunately, we can fix this problem by using the ssh-add -c option; we can add additional security by using individual ssh-agent instances to store one root key for each remote machine. The -c option tells ssh-agent to have the user confirm each use of a cached key. Devoting one ssh-agent instance per host prevents any as yet unknown ssh-agent vulnerability from exposing one machine's key to another.

Using the ssh-add confirm option is easy; simply set the -c option whenever adding a key to ssh-agent. Let's give it a try. Start two agents on machine1, specifiying predefined sockets:

   ssh-add -c /media/usbdisk/key-rsa-root@machine2
   ssh-add -c /media/usbdisk/key-rsa-root@machine3

You'll be asked to confirm use of the key when you ssh to machine2 and machine3.

You also can use separate ssh-agents to store each key. Let's give it a try; start two agents on machine1, specifying predefined sockets:

   ssh-agent -a /tmp/ssh-agent-root@machine2
   ssh-agent -a /tmp/ssh-agent-root@machine3

Once again, I'm using an arbitrary yet descriptive naming convention. Set the environmental variable, and add the key for machine2:

   export SSH_AUTH_SOCK=/tmp/ssh-agent-root@machine2
   ssh-add -c /media/usbdisk/key-rsa-root@machine2

Repeat this process for machine3, making the appropriate substitutions:

   export SSH_AUTH_SOCK=/tmp/ssh-agent-root@machine3
   ssh-add -c /media/usbdisk/key-rsa-root@machine3

Now, log in to machine3 (we'll go to machine3 at this point as we just set the SSH_AUTH_SOCK variable to point to machine3's agent):

   ssh -A -i /media/usbdisk/key-rsa-bob@machine2 bob@machine3

Run the following command to see what keys you can query on machine1:

   ssh-add -l

You see only the key for root on machine3.

Exit from machine3, change the environmental variable to the machine2 ssh-agent socket, and log in to machine2:

   export SSH_AUTH_SOCK=/tmp/ssh-agent-root@machine2
   ssh -A -i /media/usbdisk/key-rsa-bob@machine2 bob@machine2

Check your keys again:

   ssh-add -l

Checking your keys on machine2 and machine3 reveals only the root key for that machine. In the previous example, by using a single ssh-agent, you would have seen the keys for both machine2 and machine3.

Using separate ssh-agent instances for each machine you log in to requires more work.

Resetting the SSH_AUTH_SOCK variable every time you want to log in to another machine is impractical. To simplify the process, I've written a simple script tfssh (two-factor ssh) to simplify the process. Its syntax is:

   tfssh [username@]host [keydir]

The script [Listing 1 on the LJ FTP site at ftp.linuxjournal.com/pub/lj/listings/issue152/8957.tgz] starts ssh-agent when necessary, sets the environmental variable, adds the root keys to ssh-agent and logs in to the remote machine as the user. You also can tell tfssh to look in an arbitrary directory ([keydir]) for its keys and also set a key timeout for the key cache.

______________________

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Two-Factor ssh

Mike Kachline's picture

Agree with Nicholas above. An ssh key + "passphrase" is indeed, not "two-factor" because, as he mentioned, the presence of a passphrase is never validated on the server.

Furthermore, an ssh key (something you have) which is stored onto a USB thumb drive (something you have) is still, technically speaking, single factor authentication. Much like requiring multiple "chained" passwords is still single-factor authentication.

A possible workaround is to use an SSH key which "forces" a command of "sudo /bin/login". By doing so, one would first authenticate with the SSH key (something you have), and then need to authenticate through the "regular" PAM stack (Something you know.) This has the added bonus that the "pam stack" authentication would enforce other rules such as password complexity, fail counts, and so forth.

This is single factor, not two factor authentication

Nicholas Sushkin's picture

Paul,

RSA key authentication is a single factor authentication. The server only verifies your RSA key, which is the only authentication factor. The key's passphrase is only relevant for protecting your private key in your client machine. You can set empty passphrase, the server doesn't care.

The authentication would have been two factor, if the server verified both the key and a static password independent of the key.

mv not quite secure :)

witek's picture

Don't move cryptokeys using "mv". Use "cp", then "shred" or "wipe".

Excelent article.

White Paper
Linux Management with Red Hat Satellite: Measuring Business Impact and ROI

Linux has become a key foundation for supporting today's rapidly growing IT environments. Linux is being used to deploy business applications and databases, trading on its reputation as a low-cost operating environment. For many IT organizations, Linux is a mainstay for deploying Web servers and has evolved from handling basic file, print, and utility workloads to running mission-critical applications and databases, physically, virtually, and in the cloud. As Linux grows in importance in terms of value to the business, managing Linux environments to high standards of service quality — availability, security, and performance — becomes an essential requirement for business success.

Learn More

Sponsored by Red Hat

White Paper
Private PaaS for the Agile Enterprise

If you already use virtualized infrastructure, you are well on your way to leveraging the power of the cloud. Virtualization offers the promise of limitless resources, but how do you manage that scalability when your DevOps team doesn’t scale? In today’s hypercompetitive markets, fast results can make a difference between leading the pack vs. obsolescence. Organizations need more benefits from cloud computing than just raw resources. They need agility, flexibility, convenience, ROI, and control.

Stackato private Platform-as-a-Service technology from ActiveState extends your private cloud infrastructure by creating a private PaaS to provide on-demand availability, flexibility, control, and ultimately, faster time-to-market for your enterprise.

Learn More

Sponsored by ActiveState