Recovery of RAID and LVM2 Volumes
- « first
- ‹ previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
Realizing the promise of Apache® Hadoop® requires the effective deployment of compute, memory, storage and networking to achieve optimal results. With its flexibility and multitude of options, it is easy to over or under provision the server infrastructure, resulting in poor performance and high TCO. Join us for an in depth, technical discussion with industry experts from leading Hadoop and server companies who will provide insights into the key considerations for designing and deploying an optimal Hadoop cluster.
Sponsored by AMD
Built-in forensics, incident response, and security with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Every security policy provides guidance and requirements for ensuring adequate protection of information and data, as well as high-level technical and administrative security requirements for a system in a given environment. Traditionally, providing security for a system focuses on the confidentiality of the information on it. However, protecting the data integrity and system and data availability is just as important. For example, when processing United States intelligence information, there are three attributes that require protection: confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
Learn more about catching the bad guy in this free white paper.
Sponsored by DLT Solutions
| Designing Electronics with Linux | May 22, 2013 |
| Dynamic DNS—an Object Lesson in Problem Solving | May 21, 2013 |
| Using Salt Stack and Vagrant for Drupal Development | May 20, 2013 |
| Making Linux and Android Get Along (It's Not as Hard as It Sounds) | May 16, 2013 |
| Drupal Is a Framework: Why Everyone Needs to Understand This | May 15, 2013 |
| Home, My Backup Data Center | May 13, 2013 |
- Designing Electronics with Linux
- Making Linux and Android Get Along (It's Not as Hard as It Sounds)
- Dynamic DNS—an Object Lesson in Problem Solving
- Using Salt Stack and Vagrant for Drupal Development
- New Products
- Build a Skype Server for Your Home Phone System
- Validate an E-Mail Address with PHP, the Right Way
- Why Python?
- A Topic for Discussion - Open Source Feature-Richness?
- Tech Tip: Really Simple HTTP Server with Python
- Great
1 hour 59 min ago - Reply to comment | Linux Journal
2 hours 8 min ago - Understanding the Linux Kernel
4 hours 22 min ago - General
6 hours 52 min ago - Kernel Problem
16 hours 55 min ago - BASH script to log IPs on public web server
21 hours 22 min ago - DynDNS
1 day 58 min ago - Reply to comment | Linux Journal
1 day 1 hour ago - All the articles you talked
1 day 3 hours ago - All the articles you talked
1 day 3 hours ago
Enter to Win an Adafruit Pi Cobbler Breakout Kit for Raspberry Pi

It's Raspberry Pi month at Linux Journal. Each week in May, Adafruit will be giving away a Pi-related prize to a lucky, randomly drawn LJ reader. Winners will be announced weekly.
Fill out the fields below to enter to win this week's prize-- a Pi Cobbler Breakout Kit for Raspberry Pi.
Congratulations to our winners so far:
- 5-8-13, Pi Starter Pack: Jack Davis
- 5-15-13, Pi Model B 512MB RAM: Patrick Dunn
- 5-21-13, Prototyping Pi Plate Kit: Philip Kirby
- Next winner announced on 5-27-13!
Free Webinar: Hadoop
How to Build an Optimal Hadoop Cluster to Store and Maintain Unlimited Amounts of Data Using Microservers
Realizing the promise of Apache® Hadoop® requires the effective deployment of compute, memory, storage and networking to achieve optimal results. With its flexibility and multitude of options, it is easy to over or under provision the server infrastructure, resulting in poor performance and high TCO. Join us for an in depth, technical discussion with industry experts from leading Hadoop and server companies who will provide insights into the key considerations for designing and deploying an optimal Hadoop cluster.
Some of key questions to be discussed are:
- What is the “typical” Hadoop cluster and what should be installed on the different machine types?
- Why should you consider the typical workload patterns when making your hardware decisions?
- Are all microservers created equal for Hadoop deployments?
- How do I plan for expansion if I require more compute, memory, storage or networking?




Comments
Thanks
Count another life saved. In spite of destroying one HD out of a two HD LVM set, we still recovered some data thanks to these tips. Not too shabby.
Alternate recovery method
In my situation I did not have any explicit RAID arrays. I just had the standard RedHat FC5 configuration of a single VolGroup00 volume group with two logical volumes. I pulled that 20GB drive from my system recently and installed a 320GB drive in its place and reinstalled FC5. Because this new drive had the same VolGroup00 volume group created, I could not mount the 20 GB drive I had in a USB enclosure.
It seemed that most of this article was aimed at teasing out the lvm metadata and rewriting it to affect a volume group name change. Since all of the lvm tools require that you address the volume groups on your physical drives by their name, you enconter the naming conflict (how hard would it have been to include a rename command that took a physical path and renamed the volume there?).
Rather than fight that battle, I booted off my FC5 rescue CD (or any bootable tools CD with the LVM tools on it) and did a:
vgrename VolGroup00 Seagate320
The naming conflict didn't really matter here it seems. It just renamed whatever VolGroup00 it found first, which happened to be my new 320 G drive. I could then activate both with:
vgchange -ay
and then mount the volumes and copy, etc.
Nice recovery method
This looks like a much simpler way to do things, as long as you are not dealing with software RAID.
One thing you'd need to be careful about is making sure that you leave the new VolGroup00 named VolGroup00 at the end of the recovery process.
I suspect that using vgrename / vgscan / vgchange in combination would allow you to rename both volume groups to something else, then rename the newest VolGroup00 back to VolGroup00, so that the system would continue to work on boot.
You could probably use the same technique after you recovered the RAID configuration, and avoid the messy surgery on raw disk information. Next time I encounter this issue, I'll give that a try.
With my distro (Ubuntu), and
With my distro (Ubuntu), and I suspect many others these days, drives are actually mounted by UUID, not by device name *or* by VG/LV name. So renaming the VG, even the one containing root, should *) not be a problem.
What I did to recover with a RAID1/LVM stack which blew one of the drives, was boot the ubuntu desktop liveCD, sudo apt-get install mdadm lvm2, mdadm --assemble /dev/mdX (be careful of raid devnames that occur in multiples -- ie run this on recoveryPC with old_drives, and disconnected recoveryPC_drives -- but it will simply scan the drives attached for appropriate partitions), then the lvm stuff will simply magically appear and you can vgrename easily if necessary. Once you've done that, connect all the drives and reboot, and after the mdadm.conf magic you will have all your data.
Incidentally, on my home server, raid1 OS disks, Raid5 storage disks, and LVM over the top, hell yeah that makes sense. On my desktop, not so much.
* Yeah. I haven't tested this explicitly.
Thanks!
This article save my day!
Thanks!
This worked great for me. Thanks for putting it together!
Doesn't quite work for me
I just ran into a similar problem attempting to move a disk from one machine to another, with both disks configured as VolGroup00. I worked through your example, but when it came to restoring VolGroup01 (Listing 6), vgcfgrestore refused claiming it couldn't find a contents line. In my dump, there are 5 additional header lines before the VolGroup01 { line, which vgcfgrestore requires.
After I figured this out and restored the volume group, I could not get any logical volumes to show up. lvscan did not pick up the three logical volumes on the volume group! Those were also in the dd extracted file, so I had to add all of that back into the config file and do another vgcfgrestore, vgactivate.
This is really disconcerting, as this is likely to be a common problem. Unfortunately it seems that LVM is NOT the way to go for the typical workstation, unless someone really needs the ability to resize a volume.
Correction to Listing 6
It appears that Listing 6 got truncated somewhere along the line before publication.
The full Listing 6 should be:
Listing 6: Modified Volume Group Configuration File
VolGroup01 {
id = "xQZqTG-V4wn-DLeQ-bJ0J-GEHB-4teF-A4PPBv"
seqno = 1
status = ["RESIZEABLE", "READ", "WRITE"]
extent_size = 65536
max_lv = 0
max_pv = 0
physical_volumes {
pv0 {
id = "tRACEy-cstP-kk18-zQFZ-ErG5-QAIV-YqHItA"
device = "/dev/md2"
status = ["ALLOCATABLE"]
pe_start = 384
pe_count = 2365
}
}
# Generated by LVM2: Sun Feb 5 22:57:19 2006
logical_volumes {
LogVol00 {
id = "i17qXJ-Blzu-u1Dr-bSlR-0kNC-yuBH-lnbkSi"
status = ["READ", "WRITE", "VISIBLE"]
segment_count = 1
segment1 {
start_extent = 0
extent_count = 2364
type = "striped"
stripe_count = 1 # linear
stripes = [
"pv0", 0
]
}
}
}
}
contents = "Text Format Volume Group"
version = 1
description = ""
creation_host = "localhost.localdomain" # Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.9-11.EL #1 Wed Jun 8 20:20:13 CDT 2005 i686
creation_time = 1139180239 # Sun Feb 5 22:57:19 2006
what if the machine your
what if the machine your using for recovery has raid itself?? when you append to mdadm.conf can md0,1,2 be renumbered to 3,4,5?
Renumbering md0 to md3, for example, works
You should be able to do that without any problems, as long as you explicitly keep the UUID signature in the renamed device line.
Experienced this exact
Experienced this exact problem. moved a md0/md1 disk to a recovery workstation that already had an md0/md1 device. they could not coexist, and I could not find a way to move the additional md0/md1 devices to md2/md3. I ended up disconnecting the system md0/md1 devices, booting up with sysresccd and shoving the data over the network.
bleah
I ran into the same issue
I ran into the same issue and solved it with a little reading about mdadm. All you have to do is create a new array from the old disks.
# MAKEDEV md1
# mdadm -C /dev/md1 -l 1 -n 2 missing /dev/sdb1
Voila. Your raid array has now been moved from md0 to md1.
I ran into the same issue
I ran into the same issue and solved it with a little reading about mdadm. All you have to do is create a new array from the old disks.
# MAKEDEV md1
# mdadm -C /dev/md1 -l 1 -n 2 missing /dev/sdb1
Voila. Your raid array has now been moved from md0 to md1.
Recovery Linux Data
Kernel Linux - Ext2 & Ext3 Data Recovery Software supports LVM Partition PARTIALLY
LVM Recovery
LVM Data Recovery
I review data recovery software for my employer. I would like an opportunity to test your software if possible.
Data Recovery Software for Linux
If you need efficient linux data recovery software, which runs on Linux then download Linux Data Recovery Software.
LVM Recovery
Recover Data for Linux also supports LVM Recovery. Download the software DEMO and scan you disk for lost data and files.
Visit : Recover Data Software