Dependence and Independence

September 6th, 2005 by Doc Searls in

In the midst of unimaginable destruction, a reminder of how much we rely on others and how much they rely on us.

Editor's Note: The following is the text of the September 1 edition of Doc Searls' SuitWatch newsletter. Sign up to be a subscriber of this bi-weekly newsletter.

August 31, 2005--I hardly know where to begin. I'm rewriting the rewriting of a post that's a story about one of the biggest events in US history, yet one that's hardly begun.

Katrina.

Here's betting that the name Katrina, falling in popularity since it peaked at #90 in 1980, will hit a new US low in 2005. It was #281 in 2004. (Source: Social Security Administration.) Who would name their kid after the hurricane that caused more destruction than any other in US history--one which, among other sins, drowned New Orleans, one of the world's most beloved cities, making refugees of perhaps a million or more people, while killing thousands? From the day after, estimated death tolls have been rising as an exponent, from tens to hundreds to thousands.

I'm no fan of President Bush, but the speech he gave just after 5pm Eastern time on Wednesday, August 31, moved me to the edge of tears. He's our country's leader, whether or not we voted for him; and we needed to see and hear him lead. It's hard not to welcome and appreciate his assurances and his compassion.

Listening to him, I was reminded of my Uncle Chris, the best family doctor I've ever known. From the 50s through the 80s, Uncle Chris (Clinton S. Crissman, M.D.) was the town doctor for Graham, NC. One time, in my early 30s, I had a medical scare that put me in the Intensive Care Unit at Durham County General Hospital. I had a lot of friends who were medical professionals, who came in to wish their best and deliver plenty of Science, which I was glad to hear. Uncle Chris came down from Graham, put his big warm hands on my ankles and said "David, your job is to hold down the bed. You just listen to what the doctors and nurses tell you to do, and you'll be all right." (My own nickname is owed in part to an overpopulation of Davids. The name was #6 in 1947 when I was born and peaked at #1 in 1960. It finally fell out of the Top 10 in 1993.)

Those four words, "You'll be all right," had more healing power than anything else I've ever heard. President Bush said much the same kind of thing in his speech. It's a Southern Thing and a Family Thing. It's what you want to hear from your dad after you've hurt yourself or put your butt in a sling. It's an expression of faith maximized by its understatement. It also leverages a dependency to endorse its opposite: independence.

These two qualities--dependence and independence--are at the heart of all growth, of all institutions, of all opportunity, of all pursuit and achievement. We depend on that from which we grow in an independent direction. That's what growing up is about. Same with recovery.

It's a gift with two sides, like a coin. This is what Uncle Chris and Aunt Doris--his remarkable wife, sister of my own remarkable mother--gave their five boys. It's what my parents gave my sister and myself. It's what I gave and continue to give to my own kids, most of whom are now in their 30s and about as independent as they come.

It's also what makes a healthy market ecosystem, whether the category is computing, publishing, retail, transportation or whatever. In each, we are dependent on large vendors, major suppliers of infrastructure and building materials--and in some cases on government, though not too much of it. But more significantly, we are independent of all those institutions.

What impresses me most, watching the whole connected world recover from Katrina, is the growing context of connected independence. Take for example the Slidell Hurricane Damage Blog, created on Tuesday by Brian Oberkirchs. As I wrote this (Wednesday, August 31), that blog already had become Slidell's newspaper on the Web. Give it a read and try not to be impressed by its mixture of independence--from all other media--and dependence--on the ordinary folks who contribute to and use it and the community they sustain in the absence of homes, businesses and services on which they normally depend. Go to Technorati and do a tag search for the word "missing". There are 225 listings so far. Most of them are as moving as the pictures of missing loved ones on the walls outside the World Trade Center after 9/11/2001.

What you'll be seeing are standards, practices and services that didn't exist three years ago. Those all live today in the World Live Web, which is growing all over the place, almost entirely upwards from the grass roots of technology and individual enterprise.

The Web we knew in 1995 was static: a province of "sites" and "locations" that we "architected", "designed" and "put up" like real estate projects, many of which were always "under construction". The Live Web is filled with voice calls, instant messages, up-to-the minute blogs and podcasts, syndicated news and media files from countless individual sources. None of the Usual Suspects--the phone and cable companies, government, standards organizations or even large vendors such as IBM and Microsoft--invented it, even though to some degree and in many places the Live Web depends on some or all of them.

Technorati, as with most of its competitors, runs on Linux, the LAMP stack and other open-source building materials and practices, some of which, such as tag search and the rel="tag" element, are of its own invention. (Disclosure: I'm on the Technorati advisory board.) Similar innovations are happening at Icerocket, Feedster, FeedBurner, PubSub, BlogPulse, BlogLines and countless other new and fundamentally independent companies. Big companies such as Google and Yahoo help here and there, but they're not taking the lead. They don't have to.

Even watching CNN, Fox and the other TV networks, I'm struck by how much they seem to be coping with the realization that most of the best sources, as well as most of the intelligence about What's Actually Happening, are outside their organizations and those of their competitors. They have to point to blogs such as Brian Oberkirsch's, because that's where the best sources are.

Thus, those on which we depend come to depend on us.

Hard as it is, it's a form of growing up.

By the way, I first heard the term "World Live Web" from my son Allen, who blogs at Wondiring. I've been depending on it ever since.

Doc Searls is Senior Editor of Linux Journal, for which he writes the Linux for Suits column. He also presides over Doc Searls' IT Garage, which is published by SSC, the publisher of Linux Journal.

__________________________

Doc Searls is Senior Editor of Linux Journal

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

dependence

On December 12th, 2005 Anonymous (not verified) says:

Dependence is more acurately characterized as a drive.
Dependence is historically ancient and evolutionarily significant.
As such it operates through evolution in a fashion similar to that of sexual selection as observed by Darwin.
Dependence is observed in a wide range of species from fish, alligators, fossil evidence suggests dinosaurs, obviously in avian species. Dependence as a drive acts quixotically in that it is non homeostatic, similarily to sexual/reproductive expression but its succesfull initiation is mortal to the infant.
The primary dependence expression by the neonate elicits the secondary expression from the parent. As the essential factor in this style of reproduction, this is not left to chance or whims. The motivational impulse of the involved parties are drive originated, just as in the sexual expressions of mate selection (competitive sexual selection), coitus, and reproduction. The relationship between the impulses of sexuality and dependence is obvious but the two impulses are incongruent and generally incompatible. Which is to say, the adult, sexualized mind operates with distinctly differing motivations than the presexualized infant and the juevenile, acting towards acheiving sexualized psychology.
Dependence acts evolutionarily in the folowing manner. The period of infantile/juevenile dependence cannot exceed the capacity of the parental response.
Independence is only a theoretical abstract among sexually reproducing species. A-sexual reproduction does occur but generally only among primitive species. Even among those rare species, some worms, lizards, capable of self-fertilization or sexual transmutation the reproductive process is still a sexual one. Nondependent psychology is another entire subject.

Featured Video

Shawn Powers has a message for hardware vendors. Listen up!

From the Magazine

July 2008, #171

Heard of the Web? If not, read on. This month we talk with Matt Mullenweg about WordPress. If you want to get your hands dirty in Web code, take a look at the rest of our feature articles on WebKit, Dojo and OpenLaszlo.

In the rest of the issue, you'll find articles on OpenID, RDFa and Quanta Plus. Kyle Rankin puts a new spin (as in "no" spin SSD) on hard drives and also tells you how to migrate to that new disk (spinning or not). Mick Bauer continues his series on customizing live CD's. And, James Gray gives us a feel for the state of Linux in the enterprise. After all that, you may need some TV time. If so, check out our review on how to make that digital TV tuner card work in your Linux box.

Read this issue