Linux in Government: Outside the US, People Get It
Major governments outside the United States either have adopted Linux and open-source software or have begun the process that will lead to adoption. Open-source software, especially Linux, has spread globally to countries and regions that regard it as the best model of software development and an engine of economic growth. Governments see adoption as a way to exploit a promising trend.
The starting point for global Linux adoption began in Europe approximately four years ago. In 2001, the German parliament adopted a resolution that declared the government should use open-source software "whenever doing so will reduce costs". Two years later, a technology advisory group to the European Commission issued a report that called open-source software "a great opportunity" for the region that could "change the rules in the information technology industry", reducing Europe's reliance on imports.
In 2004, $19.5 billion of Linux-related technologies were sold in Poland and Russia alone. During the same period, seven leading Indian enterprises began porting application software and development work to Linux. Those companies included BSNL; Indian Railway Catering and Tourism Corporation; South Asian Petrochem, Ltd.; Kotak Mahindra Bank; IDBI Bank; Central Bank of India; and the Department of Treasury, Government of West Bengal.
In Latin America, the six largest markets comprise the fastest growing region for Linux adoption anywhere. The six markets include Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico and Venezuela. According to a recent IDC report, "the Linux operating system is gaining broader acceptance in the vendor and user communities in Latin America, making it one of the fastest-growing segments within the operating system software market". Other examples abound, including Spain, Norway and South Africa.
Interestingly, the US government appears to favor a company it deemed a monopoly over Linux and open-source software. While technically educated Linux and open-source work forces have grown in Germany, China, Brazil, India and Hungary since 2001, the US government has done nothing to keep pace with the rest of the world. Only a decade ago, the US held a technological edge over Europe and Asia in all areas of IT. Today, the once burgeoning IT industry in the US has given way to its competitors, especially China and India.
These countries among others have gained the capacity and the desire to change. People also have seen Linux markets around the globe strengthen. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to realize that any country can assemble parts from China and put its own label on the resulting personal computers with ease. The only thing left to add is an operating system, and people can get one for free.
In my travels and work with governments, I have seen only one organization oppose Linux and open-source software. Regardless of where I go, Microsoft shows up and argues against open source. If the opposition doesn't call itself Microsoft, then it calls itself the Business Software Alliance or some other alter-ego.
One would think that the United States government eventually would conclude that not only has it lost its lead in technology, but perhaps the ugliest American of them all shows up as our de facto representative. Personally, I would rather have Condoleezza Rice's State Department showing up at technology hearings in foreign governments rather than Microsoft.
Finally, one might consider that by destroying its competitors, Microsoft has weakened the US technology sector rather than strengthening it. Look around and we see a technology sector suffering so badly that US universities have seen enrollment in computer sciences drop to nil. Additionally, the once well-trained US information technology workforce has aged, moved into other industries and suffered from the influx of foreign competitors.
Earlier this year, Microsoft announced partnerships with three of China's leading computer makers: Founder Technology, Tsinghua Tongfang and TCL. The partnerships involve bundling the Windows operating system, promoting the use of legal operating systems and giving customers greater added value, according to the announcements. Conspicuously absent was China's biggest computer maker, Lenovo Group. From reports I have read, the absence prompted many questions from the audience.
Microsoft reportedly explained that additional Chinese computer makers would join the program in the future. They also reportedly said that Lenovo was "busy with consolidation issues" resulting from its acquisition of IBM's PC unit. But is that really the case?
Many believe Lenovo will increase its use of Linux, which competes with Windows. Last year, Lenovo adopted Linux and partnered with IBM, the largest corporate supporter of Linux. As a user of an IBM Thinkpad, I have been pleasantly surprised at the increased Linux support for legacy IBM laptops from Lenovo. I never saw drivers, utilities and modules to support the Thinkpad's power management under Linux when IBM ran the company.
Regardless of Microsoft's claims, the development of Linux's operating systems in China has velocity and magnitude and shows signs of strong future growth. Another report from International Data Corp (IDC) indicates that Linux's growing popularity in China might be more than a trend.
Practical Task Scheduling Deployment
July 20, 2016 12:00 pm CDT
One of the best things about the UNIX environment (aside from being stable and efficient) is the vast array of software tools available to help you do your job. Traditionally, a UNIX tool does only one thing, but does that one thing very well. For example, grep is very easy to use and can search vast amounts of data quickly. The find tool can find a particular file or files based on all kinds of criteria. It's pretty easy to string these tools together to build even more powerful tools, such as a tool that finds all of the .log files in the /home directory and searches each one for a particular entry. This erector-set mentality allows UNIX system administrators to seem to always have the right tool for the job.
Cron traditionally has been considered another such a tool for job scheduling, but is it enough? This webinar considers that very question. The first part builds on a previous Geek Guide, Beyond Cron, and briefly describes how to know when it might be time to consider upgrading your job scheduling infrastructure. The second part presents an actual planning and implementation framework.
Join Linux Journal's Mike Diehl and Pat Cameron of Help Systems.
Free to Linux Journal readers.Register Now!
- Paranoid Penguin - Building a Secure Squid Web Proxy, Part IV
- SUSE LLC's SUSE Manager
- Google's SwiftShader Released
- Managing Linux Using Puppet
- My +1 Sword of Productivity
- Murat Yener and Onur Dundar's Expert Android Studio (Wrox)
- Non-Linux FOSS: Caffeine!
- SourceClear Open
- SuperTuxKart 0.9.2 Released
- Parsing an RSS News Feed with a Bash Script
With all the industry talk about the benefits of Linux on Power and all the performance advantages offered by its open architecture, you may be considering a move in that direction. If you are thinking about analytics, big data and cloud computing, you would be right to evaluate Power. The idea of using commodity x86 hardware and replacing it every three years is an outdated cost model. It doesn’t consider the total cost of ownership, and it doesn’t consider the advantage of real processing power, high-availability and multithreading like a demon.
This ebook takes a look at some of the practical applications of the Linux on Power platform and ways you might bring all the performance power of this open architecture to bear for your organization. There are no smoke and mirrors here—just hard, cold, empirical evidence provided by independent sources. I also consider some innovative ways Linux on Power will be used in the future.Get the Guide